Misplaced Pages

2016 California Proposition 52

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

Proposition 52
Medi-Cal Hospital Fee Program
Results
Choice Votes %
Yes 9,427,714 70.07%
No 4,026,710 29.93%
Valid votes 13,454,424 92.09%
Invalid or blank votes 1,156,085 7.91%
Total votes 14,610,509 100.00%
Registered voters/turnout 19,411,771 75.27%

Results by county

Yes

  50–60%   60–70%   70–80%

Source: California Secretary of State
Elections in California
Federal government
U.S. President
U.S. Senate
U.S. House of Representatives
State governmentExecutive
Governor
Lieutenant governor
Attorney general
Secretary of state
Treasurer
Controller
Insurance commissioner
Superintendent
Board of equalization

Legislature
Senate
Assembly

Judiciary
Court of appeals

Elections by year
State propositions
1910–1919
1960–1969
1970–1979
1980–1989
1990–1999
2000–2009
2010–2019
2020–2029

Full list
Los Angeles CountyLos Angeles County
Board of supervisors
Ballot measures
  • 1980
  • 2008
  • 2012
  • 2016
Elections

Los Angeles
Mayor
City attorney
Ballot measures
  • 1986
  • 2017
Elections

Long Beach
Mayor
Orange CountyOrange County
Board of supervisors
District attorney

Anaheim
Mayor

Irvine
Mayor

Costa Mesa
Municipal
Sacramento
Mayor
San Diego CountySan Diego County
Board of supervisors

San Diego
Mayor
City attorney
City council
San Francisco
Mayor
District attorney
Board of supervisors
Board of education
Ballot measures
  • 2024
Elections
San Jose
Mayor
Other localities
Bakersfield

Mayoral elections:

Fresno

Mayoral elections:

Oakland

Mayoral elections:

Riverside

Mayoral elections:

San Bernardino

Mayoral elections:

Stockton

Mayoral elections:

Proposition 52 is a California ballot proposition that passed on the November 8, 2016 ballot, regarding indefinitely extending an existing charge on hospitals to fund Medi-Cal health care services. The charge, called the "Hospital Quality Assurance Fee", has been collected since 2009 with temporary renewals and was scheduled to expire on January 1, 2018.

Arguments for the measure stated that the charge helps to secure more than $4 billion in federal matching funds annually. Additionally, the measure would help curtail the diversion of some of the funds to things other than Medi-Cal. Arguments against the measure stated that it lacks oversight and that there would still be no guarantee that funds would be spent on healthcare.

References

  1. "Statement of Vote - November 8, 2016, General Election". December 16, 2016. Retrieved January 7, 2017.
  2. "Official Voter Information Guide" (PDF). California Secretary of State. Retrieved 13 September 2016.
  3. "Yes on Proposition 52 to keep Medi-Cal funded". Los Angeles Times. September 13, 2016. Retrieved 17 September 2016.
  4. Colliver, Victoria (September 9, 2016). "Prop. 52, a measure to fund Medi-Cal, is its own worst enemy". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 17 September 2016.
  5. "California Proposition 52, Voter Approval to Divert Hospital Fee Revenue Dedicated to Medi-Cal (2016)". Ballotpedia. Retrieved 13 September 2016.

External links


Stub icon

This article about the politics of California is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories:
2016 California Proposition 52 Add topic