Misplaced Pages

Gnomic will

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Gnomic will" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (January 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Gnomic will (Greek: Θἑλημα γνωμικόν, θέλησι γνωμική) is an Eastern Christian theological notion meaning spontaneous individual aspiration and movement of the mind.

Overview

This notion belongs to Maximus the Confessor.

The term gnomic derives from the Greek gnome, meaning “inclination” or “intention”. Within Orthodox theology, gnomic willing is contrasted with natural willing. Natural willing designates the movement of a creature in accordance with the principle (logos (Greek: λόγος)) of its nature towards the fulfilment (telos (Greek: τέλος), stasis (Greek: στάσις)) of its being. Gnomic willing, on the other hand, designates that form of willing in which a person engages in a process of deliberation, culminating in a decision.

Within the theology of St. Maximus, which was endorsed by the Sixth Ecumenical Council in condemning monothelitism, Jesus Christ possessed no gnomic will. St. Maximus developed this claim, particularly in his Dialogue with Pyrrhus. According to St. Maximus, the process of gnomic willing presupposes that a person does not know what they want, so they must deliberate and choose between a range of choices. However, Jesus Christ, as both man and the second Person of the Trinity, possessed complete congruence of his two wills: the divine and the human. Therefore, St. Maximus reasoned that Jesus was never in a state of ignorance regarding what he wanted, and so he never engaged in gnomic willing.

Aristotle, a major philosophical influence on Maximus, in comparing the works of Nature with those of a human worker, had also declared that any process of deliberation, far from indicating superior intellect, is a sign of our weakness.

See also

References

  1. „Θἑλημα γνωμικόν ἐστιν, ἡ ἐφ᾽ ἑκάτερα τοῦ λογισμοῦ αὐθαίρετος ὁρμὴ τε καὶ κίνησις.” – PG 91 / Opuscula Theologica et Polemica / col. 153
  2. Sotiris Mitralexis, Georgios Steiris, Marcin Podbielski, Sebastian Lalla. «Maximus the Confessor as a European Philosopher» / Wipf and Stock Publishers / 18.09.2017 / p. 77
  3. Basil Lourié. «История византийской философии» / III. Ранневизантийское богословие / Богословский синтез VII века: святой Максим Исповедник и его эпоха / 4. Богословие святого Максима Исповедника / 4.2 Тропос существования и энергия природы / 4.2.6 Теория волевого акта: воля природная и воля гномическая / p. 395

Sources

Category:
Gnomic will Add topic