Misplaced Pages

Nonidentity problem

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Concept in population ethics

This article may be confusing or unclear to readers. Please help clarify the article. There might be a discussion about this on the talk page. (July 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The nonidentity problem (also called the paradox of future individuals) in population ethics is the problem that an act may still be wrong even if it is not wrong for anyone. More precisely, the nonidentity problem is the inability to simultaneously hold the following beliefs: (1) a person-affecting view; (2) bringing someone into existence whose life is worth living, albeit flawed, is not "bad for" that person; (3) some acts of bringing someone into existence are wrong even if they are not bad for someone. Rivka Weinberg has used the nonidentity problem to study the ethics of reproduction.

See also

References

  1. Kavka, Gregory (1982). "The Paradox of Future Individuals" (PDF). Philosophy and Public Affairs.
  2. Roberts, M. A. "The Nonidentity Problem". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 17 December 2015.
  3. Conly, Sarah (18 December 2018). "Review The risk of a lifetime: how, when, and why procreation may be permissible". Journal of Moral Philosophy. 15 (6): 787–790. doi:10.1163/17455243-01506007. S2CID 182385668.

Further reading

Population
Major topics
Population
biology
Population
ecology
Society and
population
Publications
Lists
Events and
organizations
Related topics
Stub icon

This article about ethics is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories:
Nonidentity problem Add topic