2024 United States Supreme Court case
| Office of the United States Trustee v. John Q. Hammons Fall 2006, LLC | |
|---|---|
 Supreme Court of the United States | |
| Decided June 14, 2024 | |
| Full case name | Office of the United States Trustee v. John Q. Hammons Fall 2006, LLC |
| Docket no. | 22-1238 |
| Citations | 602 U.S. ___ (more) |
| Holding | |
| Prospective parity is the appropriate remedy for the short-lived and small disparity created by the fee statute held unconstitutional in Siegel v. Fitzgerald. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Jackson |
| Dissent | Gorsuch, joined by Thomas, Barrett |
Office of the United States Trustee v. John Q. Hammons Fall 2006, LLC, 602 U.S. ___ (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that prospective parity is the appropriate remedy for the short-lived and small disparity created by the fee statute held unconstitutional in Siegel v. Fitzgerald.
References
- Office of the United States Trustee v. John Q. Hammons Fall 2006, LLC, No. 22-1238, 602 U.S. ___ (2024).
- "Justices refuse to force refund of excessive bankruptcy fees". SCOTUSblog. June 14, 2024. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
External links
- Text of Office of the United States Trustee v. John Q. Hammons Fall 2006, LLC, No. 22-1238, 602 U.S. ___ (2024) is available from: Justia
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |