Misplaced Pages

Renewed judgment as a matter of law

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Renewed judgment as a matter of law" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (August 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Civil procedure
in the United States
Jurisdiction
Venue
Pleadings
Pretrial procedure
Resolution without trial
Trial
Appeal

In the United States courts, renewed judgment as a matter of law is a party's second chance at a judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) motion. Renewed JMOL is decided after a jury has returned its verdict, and is a motion to have that verdict altered. In US federal courts this procedure has replaced judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) through Rule 50 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Renewed JMOL can only be raised before a jury begins deliberations. Seventh Amendment due process concerns demand this formality, as decided by the United States Supreme Court in Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. Redman, 295 U.S. 654 (1935).

References

  1. "Rule 50. Judgment as a Matter of Law in a Jury Trial; Related Motion for a New Trial; Conditional Ruling". LII / Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 2024-08-18.


Flag of United StatesJustice icon

This article relating to law in the United States or its constituent jurisdictions is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: