2014 United States Supreme Court case
| Scialabba v. Cuellar de Osorio | |
|---|---|
 Supreme Court of the United States | |
| Argued December 10, 2013 Decided June 9, 2014 | |
| Full case name | Lori Scialabba, Acting Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al., Petitioners v. Rosalina Cuellar de Osorio, et al. |
| Docket no. | 12-930 |
| Citations | 573 U.S. 41 (more)134 S. Ct. 2191; 189 L. Ed. 2d 98 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Motion to dismiss granted, Zhang v. Napolitano, 663 F. Supp. 2d 913 (C.D. Cal. 2009); affirmed sub. nom., Cuellar de Osorio v. Mayorkas, 656 F.3d 954 (9th Cir. 2011); reversed on rehearing en banc, 695 F.3d 1003 (9th Cir. 2012); cert. granted, 570 U.S. 916 (2013). |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Kagan, joined by Kennedy, Ginsburg |
| Concurrence | Roberts (in judgment), joined by Scalia |
| Dissent | Alito |
| Dissent | Sotomayor, joined by Breyer; Thomas (except footnote 3) |
Scialabba v. Cuellar de Osorio, 573 U.S. 41 (2014), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court found that lawful residents in the United States who turned twenty-one while their visa applications were being processed could not retain their original application date after "aging out" of eligibility for child-visas. Those "aged out" were moved to the bottom of the list of applicants for adult visas. The Ninth Circuit Court had originally agreed that provisions in the Child Status Protection Act allowed applicants to retain their date.
References
- "Scialabba v. Cuellar de Osorio". Oyez. Retrieved October 1, 2017.
- "Scialabba v. Cuellar de Osorio". SCOTUS Blog. Retrieved October 1, 2017.
External links
- Text of Scialabba v. Cuellar de Osorio, 573 U.S. 41 (2014) is available from: Justia Oyez (oral argument audio) Supreme Court (slip opinion) (archived)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |