2024 United States Supreme Court case
| Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado | |
|---|---|
 Supreme Court of the United States | |
| Argued March 20, 2024 Decided June 21, 2024 | |
| Full case name | Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado |
| Docket no. | 22O141 |
| Citations | 602 U.S. ___ (more) |
| Holding | |
| Because the proposed consent decree would dispose of the United States' Compact claims without its consent, the States' motion to enter the consent decree is denied. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Jackson, joined by Roberts, Sotamayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh |
| Dissent | Gorsuch, joined by Thomas, Alito, Barrett |
Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado, 602 U.S. ___ (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court denied the States' motion to enter the consent decree because the proposed consent decree would have disposed of the United States' Compact claims without its consent.
See also
References
- Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado, 602 U.S. ___ (2024)
- "Opinion analysis: Texas' compact claims against New Mexico over the Rio Grande River leave room for United States' claims as well". SCOTUSblog. March 5, 2018. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
External links
- Text of Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado, 602 U.S. ___ (2024) is available from: Justia
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |