User talk:162.119.231.132 - Revision history

BD2412: template out ancient IP talk page messages

2022-09-08T01:20:36Z

template out ancient IP talk page messages

PrimeBOT: /* Discretionary sanction (DS) alert */Task 24: removal of a template following a TFD

2021-10-05T15:25:25Z

Discretionary sanction (DS) alert: Task 24: removal of a template following a TFD

← Previous revision		Revision as of 15:25, 5 October 2021
Line 1,410:		Line 1,410:

	This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.		This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.
	~~}}{{Z33~~}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] (]) 15:32, 26 January 2015 (UTC)		}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] (]) 15:32, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
	:Yeah, kinda already know about it, seein' as how I just filed a case under it. ] (]) 15:35, 26 January 2015 (UTC)		:Yeah, kinda already know about it, seein' as how I just filed a case under it. ] (]) 15:35, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

MalnadachBot: Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)

2021-09-30T03:55:18Z

Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)

PackMecEng: General note: Unconstructive editing on Britney Ever After. (TW)

2017-05-13T02:06:23Z

General note: Unconstructive editing on Britney Ever After. (TW)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 02:06, 13 May 2017
Line 1,460:		Line 1,460:

	] Please stop your ]. If you continue to ] pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at ], you may be ]. <!-- Template:uw-error3 --> ] (]) 20:52, 31 October 2016 (UTC)		] Please stop your ]. If you continue to ] pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at ], you may be ]. <!-- Template:uw-error3 --> ] (]) 20:52, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

			== May 2017 ==
			] Hello, I'm ]. I wanted to let you know that one or more of ] to ] have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> ] (]) 02:06, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
			:''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself or ] so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice -->

Geraldo Perez: Warning: Introducing deliberate factual errors on Miss Spider's Sunny Patch Friends. (TW)

2016-10-31T20:52:13Z

Warning: Introducing deliberate factual errors on Miss Spider's Sunny Patch Friends. (TW)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 20:52, 31 October 2016
Line 1,458:		Line 1,458:
	== October 2016 ==		== October 2016 ==
	] Please do not add or change content, as you did at ], without citing a ]. Please review the guidelines at ] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> ] (]) 20:51, 31 October 2016 (UTC)		] Please do not add or change content, as you did at ], without citing a ]. Please review the guidelines at ] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> ] (]) 20:51, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

			] Please stop your ]. If you continue to ] pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at ], you may be ]. <!-- Template:uw-error3 --> ] (]) 20:52, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Geraldo Perez: Caution: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on The Backyardigans. (TW)

2016-10-31T20:51:26Z

Caution: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on The Backyardigans. (TW)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 20:51, 31 October 2016
Line 1,455:		Line 1,455:

	] Hello, I'm ]. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of ] —the one you made with <span class="plainlinks"></span> to ]— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 -->] (]) 23:19, 18 August 2016 (UTC)		] Hello, I'm ]. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of ] —the one you made with <span class="plainlinks"></span> to ]— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 -->] (]) 23:19, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

			== October 2016 ==
			] Please do not add or change content, as you did at ], without citing a ]. Please review the guidelines at ] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> ] (]) 20:51, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Donner60: Message re. Eskimo (HG) (3.1.21)

2016-08-18T23:19:39Z

Message re. Eskimo (HG) (3.1.21)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 23:19, 18 August 2016
Line 1,451:		Line 1,451:
	] Hello, I'm ]. I wanted to let you know that one or more of ] to ] has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> (]) ](]) 01:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)		] Hello, I'm ]. I wanted to let you know that one or more of ] to ] has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> (]) ](]) 01:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
	:''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice -->		:''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice -->

			== August 2016 ==

			] Hello, I'm ]. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of ] —the one you made with <span class="plainlinks"></span> to ]— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 -->] (]) 23:19, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Gaelan: User warning for unconstructive editing found using STiki

2016-06-08T01:22:54Z

User warning for unconstructive editing found using STiki

← Previous revision		Revision as of 01:22, 8 June 2016
Line 1,448:		Line 1,448:
	::The same as before. It has also been making the same edits as other IPs geolocating to the same area. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 20:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC)		::The same as before. It has also been making the same edits as other IPs geolocating to the same area. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 20:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
	:::So was it ever usable as a "real" proxy? Its edits appear to be pretty advanced, consistent with an experienced editor. If the IP was usable as a real proxy then that adds more to that theory. ] (]) 21:52, 3 May 2015 (UTC)		:::So was it ever usable as a "real" proxy? Its edits appear to be pretty advanced, consistent with an experienced editor. If the IP was usable as a real proxy then that adds more to that theory. ] (]) 21:52, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
			== June 2016 ==
			] Hello, I'm ]. I wanted to let you know that one or more of ] to ] has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> (]) ](]) 01:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
			:''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice -->

Faceless Enemy: /* Proxy still open? */

2015-05-03T21:52:52Z

Proxy still open?

← Previous revision		Revision as of 21:52, 3 May 2015
Line 1,447:		Line 1,447:
	:There are open ports, but I'm not able to establish a connection through them. <span style="font-family: Palatino;"> ] • ]</span> 20:38, 3 May 2015 (UTC)		:There are open ports, but I'm not able to establish a connection through them. <span style="font-family: Palatino;"> ] • ]</span> 20:38, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
	::The same as before. It has also been making the same edits as other IPs geolocating to the same area. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 20:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC)		::The same as before. It has also been making the same edits as other IPs geolocating to the same area. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 20:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
			:::So was it ever usable as a "real" proxy? Its edits appear to be pretty advanced, consistent with an experienced editor. If the IP was usable as a real proxy then that adds more to that theory. ] (]) 21:52, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Zzuuzz: /* Proxy still open? */ cmt

2015-05-03T20:46:54Z

Proxy still open?: cmt

← Previous revision		Revision as of 20:46, 3 May 2015
Line 1,446:		Line 1,446:
	{{re\|Mike V}} is this IP still an open proxy? ] (]) 20:30, 3 May 2015 (UTC)		{{re\|Mike V}} is this IP still an open proxy? ] (]) 20:30, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
	:There are open ports, but I'm not able to establish a connection through them. <span style="font-family: Palatino;"> ] • ]</span> 20:38, 3 May 2015 (UTC)		:There are open ports, but I'm not able to establish a connection through them. <span style="font-family: Palatino;"> ] • ]</span> 20:38, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
			::The same as before. It has also been making the same edits as other IPs geolocating to the same area. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 20:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 03:55, 30 September 2021
Line 32:		Line 32:
	::You're the expert - I dunno what most of that means. If I register an account will I still be unable to edit from here? If I can't that'd be a serious inconvenience. I'm stuck here a lot. ] (]) 15:39, 26 January 2015 (UTC)		::You're the expert - I dunno what most of that means. If I register an account will I still be unable to edit from here? If I can't that'd be a serious inconvenience. I'm stuck here a lot. ] (]) 15:39, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
	::{{ping\|Mike V}}, I looked at ]. It says open proxies '''may''' be blocked, for instance when use abusively. Has that happened here? I'm a legitimate user. Can I get an "IP exemption"? ] (]) 15:51, 26 January 2015 (UTC)		::{{ping\|Mike V}}, I looked at ]. It says open proxies '''may''' be blocked, for instance when use abusively. Has that happened here? I'm a legitimate user. Can I get an "IP exemption"? ] (]) 15:51, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
	:::The blocking policy and ] allows open proxies to be blocked on sight, regardless if they were used abusively. Taken from the blocking policy, ''Open or anonymous proxies may be blocked on sight.'' There simply needs to be identification and confirmation that it is an open proxy for the IP to be blocked. Please also note that the open proxy policy makes no note of blocking proxies when they are used abusively, only its rationale for blocking. They may be blocked on sight as soon as it's identified. Unfortunately, IP block exemption can only be given if you're a registered user. You will need to request an account at ]. <~~span~~ style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:14px~~"><b><font~~ color="#4682B4">~~]</font>~~</b>~~</span>~~ <sup>(<~~font~~ ~~color~~="#99BADD">]</~~font~~>)</sup> 16:30, 26 January 2015 (UTC)		:::The blocking policy and ] allows open proxies to be blocked on sight, regardless if they were used abusively. Taken from the blocking policy, ''Open or anonymous proxies may be blocked on sight.'' There simply needs to be identification and confirmation that it is an open proxy for the IP to be blocked. Please also note that the open proxy policy makes no note of blocking proxies when they are used abusively, only its rationale for blocking. They may be blocked on sight as soon as it's identified. Unfortunately, IP block exemption can only be given if you're a registered user. You will need to request an account at ]. ] <sup>(])</sup> 16:30, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
	::::The top of the page - ] - that contains the "Open proxies" section you pointed to says it is not a Misplaced Pages policy or guideline page, and where something is inconsistent with this page, please defer to those. That "Open proxies" section refers to the main, ] policy, which is what I was referring to earlier, and that says open proxies '''may''' be blocked, for instance when use abusively. There is no evidence of abuse. ] (]) 16:52, 26 January 2015 (UTC)		::::The top of the page - ] - that contains the "Open proxies" section you pointed to says it is not a Misplaced Pages policy or guideline page, and where something is inconsistent with this page, please defer to those. That "Open proxies" section refers to the main, ] policy, which is what I was referring to earlier, and that says open proxies '''may''' be blocked, for instance when use abusively. There is no evidence of abuse. ] (]) 16:52, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
	:::::I explicitly linked that as "practice" not policy. Please note that the very first sentence of WP:Proxy policy section states ''Open or anonymising proxies, including Tor, may be blocked from editing for any period at any time.'' It does not state that it may be blocked due to abuse. Also note that the blocking policy does not support what you're saying. Again, taken from the blocking policy "''Open or anonymous proxies may be blocked on sight.''" This does not mean they may be blocked if abuse is found. It simply means, that the IP may be blocked as soon as it's determined that the IP in question is an open proxy. <~~span~~ style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:14px~~"><b><font~~ color="#4682B4">~~]</font>~~</b>~~</span>~~ <sup>(<~~font~~ ~~color~~="#99BADD">]</~~font~~>)</sup> 17:06, 26 January 2015 (UTC)		:::::I explicitly linked that as "practice" not policy. Please note that the very first sentence of WP:Proxy policy section states ''Open or anonymising proxies, including Tor, may be blocked from editing for any period at any time.'' It does not state that it may be blocked due to abuse. Also note that the blocking policy does not support what you're saying. Again, taken from the blocking policy "''Open or anonymous proxies may be blocked on sight.''" This does not mean they may be blocked if abuse is found. It simply means, that the IP may be blocked as soon as it's determined that the IP in question is an open proxy. ] <sup>(])</sup> 17:06, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
	::::::I didn't mean to imply that you were passing off a practice as a policy - only to point out to readers (including IP 162) that the practice isn't a policy. (When I first started editing on Misplaced Pages, other, more experiences editors would throw around shortcuts and links to policies, guidelines, essays, etc., and I had no way of knowing that some were more important than others.)		::::::I didn't mean to imply that you were passing off a practice as a policy - only to point out to readers (including IP 162) that the practice isn't a policy. (When I first started editing on Misplaced Pages, other, more experiences editors would throw around shortcuts and links to policies, guidelines, essays, etc., and I had no way of knowing that some were more important than others.)

	::::::At any rate, what the blocking ''practice'' says is, "Open proxies may be blocked on sight ''according to the policy on open proxies''" (emphasis mine), and that last part links to the ''policy'', which says, ], that information showing that an account has been using open proxies ''may be considered'' when evaluating suspicions of sock puppetry or other editing abuses. Since there is no evidence of this, we should AGF and let IP 162 edit. ] (]) 17:20, 26 January 2015 (UTC)		::::::At any rate, what the blocking ''practice'' says is, "Open proxies may be blocked on sight ''according to the policy on open proxies''" (emphasis mine), and that last part links to the ''policy'', which says, ], that information showing that an account has been using open proxies ''may be considered'' when evaluating suspicions of sock puppetry or other editing abuses. Since there is no evidence of this, we should AGF and let IP 162 edit. ] (]) 17:20, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

	:::::::An IP is not an ] which in this case wouldn't apply as this is an IP, not an account. The block reason for this IP is for being an open proxy, not sockpuppetry as stated by Mike. Secondly, the CheckUser part on the open proxy page does not apply to this situation. In other words, if User:Example was found to be using an open proxy, this may be used as evidence and he/she may be blocked on suspicion that they have been using proxies to commit sockpuppetry. This has no relation whatsoever in determining if an open proxy is blocked or not. <~~span~~ style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:14px~~"><b><font~~ color="#4682B4">~~]</font>~~</b>~~</span>~~ <sup>(<~~font~~ ~~color~~="#99BADD">]</~~font~~>)</sup> 17:37, 26 January 2015 (UTC)		:::::::An IP is not an ] which in this case wouldn't apply as this is an IP, not an account. The block reason for this IP is for being an open proxy, not sockpuppetry as stated by Mike. Secondly, the CheckUser part on the open proxy page does not apply to this situation. In other words, if User:Example was found to be using an open proxy, this may be used as evidence and he/she may be blocked on suspicion that they have been using proxies to commit sockpuppetry. This has no relation whatsoever in determining if an open proxy is blocked or not. ] <sup>(])</sup> 17:37, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
	::::::::With your WP rights, you are obviously in a better position than I to argue policy. Maybe the pages need to be edited? But setting that aside for now, as I wrote below, if IP 162 is editing from a medical center waiting room, then doesn't ] apply? I don't have your tools, but a . That could very likely be a medical center. IP 162 isn't vandalizing. There is no evidence that they're abusing a ban. Barring something like that, since Misplaced Pages is the source anyone can edit (or however that saying goes), there is no reason to block them. ] (]) 17:51, 26 January 2015 (UTC)		::::::::With your WP rights, you are obviously in a better position than I to argue policy. Maybe the pages need to be edited? But setting that aside for now, as I wrote below, if IP 162 is editing from a medical center waiting room, then doesn't ] apply? I don't have your tools, but a . That could very likely be a medical center. IP 162 isn't vandalizing. There is no evidence that they're abusing a ban. Barring something like that, since Misplaced Pages is the source anyone can edit (or however that saying goes), there is no reason to block them. ] (]) 17:51, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

	{{outdent}} He/she isn't blocked directly/there are no sanctions placed upon them. This is why I suggested that he/she request an account to bypass the block. He/she will need IP block exemption and I or any other admin can give that. This actually might be faster. Just need a request for an account and I can handle it on ACC. It could be possible that the network has been compromised which could have lead to open proxies. <~~span~~ style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:14px~~"><b><font~~ color="#4682B4">~~]</font>~~</b>~~</span>~~ <sup>(<~~font~~ ~~color~~="#99BADD">]</~~font~~>)</sup> 18:00, 26 January 2015 (UTC)		{{outdent}} He/she isn't blocked directly/there are no sanctions placed upon them. This is why I suggested that he/she request an account to bypass the block. He/she will need IP block exemption and I or any other admin can give that. This actually might be faster. Just need a request for an account and I can handle it on ACC. It could be possible that the network has been compromised which could have lead to open proxies. ] <sup>(])</sup> 18:00, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
	:They are effectively blocked from editing from the location they're at. A shows no red flags. Has a rash of vandalism been reported at ANI from this range? A registered account has benefits, but there is no policy requiring an editor to register. Based on the evidence, I see no reason to force this editor to register to be able to edit if he/she doesn't want to. Is there another process for reviewing this? ] (]) 18:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)		:They are effectively blocked from editing from the location they're at. A shows no red flags. Has a rash of vandalism been reported at ANI from this range? A registered account has benefits, but there is no policy requiring an editor to register. Based on the evidence, I see no reason to force this editor to register to be able to edit if he/she doesn't want to. Is there another process for reviewing this? ] (]) 18:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
	::I haven't been to ANI in quite some time so I am not aware if there was any disruption coming from this network. Since this is an open proxy block, it may be reviewed at ]. <~~span~~ style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:14px~~"><b><font~~ color="#4682B4">~~]</font>~~</b>~~</span>~~ <sup>(<~~font~~ ~~color~~="#99BADD">]</~~font~~>)</sup> 18:26, 26 January 2015 (UTC)		::I haven't been to ANI in quite some time so I am not aware if there was any disruption coming from this network. Since this is an open proxy block, it may be reviewed at ]. ] <sup>(])</sup> 18:26, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
	:::Thank you, Elockid. I have . ] (]) 18:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)		:::Thank you, Elockid. I have . ] (]) 18:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)