User talk:198.70.2.200 - Revision history

PrimeBOT: /* top */Task 24: banner template removal following a TFD

PrimeBOT — Sun, 11 Jun 2023 12:23:54 GMT

top: Task 24: banner template removal following a TFD

← Previous revision		Revision as of 12:23, 11 June 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Shared IP corp\|Lason Corporation - Irving, Texas, USA}}		{{Shared IP corp\|Lason Corporation - Irving, Texas, USA}}
	{{IPsock\|Kompress0}}

	== Welcome! ==		== Welcome! ==

Thewolfchild at 21:32, 27 February 2023

Thewolfchild — Mon, 27 Feb 2023 21:32:21 GMT

← Previous revision		Revision as of 21:32, 27 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Shared IP corp\|Lason Corporation - ~~Troy~~, ~~Michigan~~, USA}}		{{Shared IP corp\|Lason Corporation - Irving, Texas, USA}}
	{{IPsock\|Kompress0}}		{{IPsock\|Kompress0}}

Ohnoitsjamie: 1 year

Ohnoitsjamie — Mon, 27 Feb 2023 15:49:48 GMT

1 year

← Previous revision		Revision as of 15:49, 27 February 2023
Line 212:		Line 212:
	::::::::Look, I appreciate and understand the need for these guidelines. I'm a stickler for being technically correct myself, it is the best kind of correct. That's why it's frustrating to be technically accurate but then be railed against by a few users who already have a bias against me. I was asked repeatedly to gain consensus for my edits. Is there anywhere I can do that objectively? And not just the article talk page? ] (]) 17:57, 22 November 2022 (UTC)		::::::::Look, I appreciate and understand the need for these guidelines. I'm a stickler for being technically correct myself, it is the best kind of correct. That's why it's frustrating to be technically accurate but then be railed against by a few users who already have a bias against me. I was asked repeatedly to gain consensus for my edits. Is there anywhere I can do that objectively? And not just the article talk page? ] (]) 17:57, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
	*I have revoked TPA because of the connection with the blocked named account {{noping\|Kompress0}}.--] (]) 19:07, 22 November 2022 (UTC)		*I have revoked TPA because of the connection with the blocked named account {{noping\|Kompress0}}.--] (]) 19:07, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

			<div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 year''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock\|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. </div></div><!-- Template:uw-block --> <b>] ]</b> 15:49, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Eyesnore: /* top */

Eyesnore — Sun, 26 Feb 2023 02:39:35 GMT

top

← Previous revision		Revision as of 02:39, 26 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Shared IP corp\|Lason Corporation - Troy, Michigan, USA}}		{{Shared IP corp\|Lason Corporation - Troy, Michigan, USA}}
	{{IPsock\|Kompress0~~\|confirmed~~}}		{{IPsock\|Kompress0}}

	== Welcome! ==		== Welcome! ==
	{{#if:\|== {{{heading}}} ==\|}}		{{#if:\|== {{{heading}}} ==\|}}

Eyesnore at 02:38, 26 February 2023

Eyesnore — Sun, 26 Feb 2023 02:38:40 GMT

← Previous revision		Revision as of 02:38, 26 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Shared IP corp\|Lason Corporation - Troy, Michigan, USA}}		{{Shared IP corp\|Lason Corporation - Troy, Michigan, USA}}
	{{~~Sockpuppet~~\|Kompress0\|~~blocked~~}}		{{IPsock\|Kompress0\|confirmed}}
	== Welcome! ==		== Welcome! ==
	{{#if:\|== {{{heading}}} ==\|}}		{{#if:\|== {{{heading}}} ==\|}}

Thewolfchild at 22:56, 18 December 2022

Thewolfchild — Sun, 18 Dec 2022 22:56:13 GMT

← Previous revision		Revision as of 22:56, 18 December 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Shared IP corp\|Lason Corporation - Troy, Michigan, USA}}		{{Shared IP corp\|Lason Corporation - Troy, Michigan, USA}}
			{{Sockpuppet\|Kompress0\|blocked}}
	== Welcome! ==		== Welcome! ==
	{{#if:\|== {{{heading}}} ==\|}}		{{#if:\|== {{{heading}}} ==\|}}

Daniel Case: /* Unblock request too: Eclectic Boogaloo */ decline unblock

Daniel Case — Wed, 23 Nov 2022 07:47:30 GMT

Unblock request too: Eclectic Boogaloo: decline unblock

← Previous revision		Revision as of 07:47, 23 November 2022
Line 197:		Line 197:
	== Unblock request too: Eclectic Boogaloo ==		== Unblock request too: Eclectic Boogaloo ==

	{{unblock\|~~reason~~=On the Ricardo Lopez talk page the user I was discussing it with agreed that the audio was muffled. Whoever added the 'Do not put Victory here' tag here also seemed to agree, as enough people heard him say 'victory' that it warranted a tag prohibiting it. As for the edit warring, the consensus was already reached before I made the first edit. ] (]) 14:44, 22 November 2022 (UTC)}} ] (]) 14:44, 22 November 2022 (UTC)		{{unblock reviewed \|1=On the Ricardo Lopez talk page the user I was discussing it with agreed that the audio was muffled. Whoever added the 'Do not put Victory here' tag here also seemed to agree, as enough people heard him say 'victory' that it warranted a tag prohibiting it. As for the edit warring, the consensus was already reached before I made the first edit. ] (]) 14:44, 22 November 2022 (UTC) \|decline = Procedural decline as user can no longer edit this talk page, so there's no point in leaving the request open. — ] (]) 07:47, 23 November 2022 (UTC)}} ] (]) 14:44, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
	:What you say is not true. In 2020 one editor agreed that the audio was "muffled", which of course is not a consensus, but even if it were, that did not mean that they agreed that the entire statement was "incoherent" as there was ''sourced'' information as to what Lopez said. And why on earth did you create such a childish section header for this unblock request?--] (]) 14:51, 22 November 2022 (UTC)		:What you say is not true. In 2020 one editor agreed that the audio was "muffled", which of course is not a consensus, but even if it were, that did not mean that they agreed that the entire statement was "incoherent" as there was ''sourced'' information as to what Lopez said. And why on earth did you create such a childish section header for this unblock request?--] (]) 14:51, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
	::I mean I can't MAKE people discuss it. The one person that did take part in the discussion agreed that it was muffled. If only two people are having the discussion and they agree, that's consensus. And the source was literally just an article from one guy, and is what's being disputed in the first place.		::I mean I can't MAKE people discuss it. The one person that did take part in the discussion agreed that it was muffled. If only two people are having the discussion and they agree, that's consensus. And the source was literally just an article from one guy, and is what's being disputed in the first place.

Bbb23: /* Unblock request too: Eclectic Boogaloo */ revoke TPA

Bbb23 — Tue, 22 Nov 2022 19:08:03 GMT

Unblock request too: Eclectic Boogaloo: revoke TPA

← Previous revision		Revision as of 19:08, 22 November 2022
Line 209:		Line 209:
	::::::::I wouldn't consider that an attack, just an observation. I made sound cases for all of my edits. ] (]) 17:47, 22 November 2022 (UTC)		::::::::I wouldn't consider that an attack, just an observation. I made sound cases for all of my edits. ] (]) 17:47, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
	::::::::Look, I appreciate and understand the need for these guidelines. I'm a stickler for being technically correct myself, it is the best kind of correct. That's why it's frustrating to be technically accurate but then be railed against by a few users who already have a bias against me. I was asked repeatedly to gain consensus for my edits. Is there anywhere I can do that objectively? And not just the article talk page? ] (]) 17:57, 22 November 2022 (UTC)		::::::::Look, I appreciate and understand the need for these guidelines. I'm a stickler for being technically correct myself, it is the best kind of correct. That's why it's frustrating to be technically accurate but then be railed against by a few users who already have a bias against me. I was asked repeatedly to gain consensus for my edits. Is there anywhere I can do that objectively? And not just the article talk page? ] (]) 17:57, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
			*I have revoked TPA because of the connection with the blocked named account {{noping\|Kompress0}}.--] (]) 19:07, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

198.70.2.200: /* Unblock request too: Eclectic Boogaloo */ Reply

198.70.2.200 — Tue, 22 Nov 2022 17:57:19 GMT

Unblock request too: Eclectic Boogaloo: Reply

← Previous revision		Revision as of 17:57, 22 November 2022
Line 208:		Line 208:
	:::::::Attacking other editors doesn't help with unblock requests normally. <span style="color: blue">—</span> ] <sup><span style="font-size:80%">⋠]⋡</span></sup> 17:43, 22 November 2022 (UTC)		:::::::Attacking other editors doesn't help with unblock requests normally. <span style="color: blue">—</span> ] <sup><span style="font-size:80%">⋠]⋡</span></sup> 17:43, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
	::::::::I wouldn't consider that an attack, just an observation. I made sound cases for all of my edits. ] (]) 17:47, 22 November 2022 (UTC)		::::::::I wouldn't consider that an attack, just an observation. I made sound cases for all of my edits. ] (]) 17:47, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
			::::::::Look, I appreciate and understand the need for these guidelines. I'm a stickler for being technically correct myself, it is the best kind of correct. That's why it's frustrating to be technically accurate but then be railed against by a few users who already have a bias against me. I was asked repeatedly to gain consensus for my edits. Is there anywhere I can do that objectively? And not just the article talk page? ] (]) 17:57, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

198.70.2.200: /* Unblock request too: Eclectic Boogaloo */ Reply

198.70.2.200 — Tue, 22 Nov 2022 17:47:11 GMT

Unblock request too: Eclectic Boogaloo: Reply

← Previous revision		Revision as of 17:47, 22 November 2022
Line 207:		Line 207:
	::::::Again, I was only blocked in the first place because wolfchild and Jacona were operating on emotion instead of reason. ] (]) 17:42, 22 November 2022 (UTC)		::::::Again, I was only blocked in the first place because wolfchild and Jacona were operating on emotion instead of reason. ] (]) 17:42, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
	:::::::Attacking other editors doesn't help with unblock requests normally. <span style="color: blue">—</span> ] <sup><span style="font-size:80%">⋠]⋡</span></sup> 17:43, 22 November 2022 (UTC)		:::::::Attacking other editors doesn't help with unblock requests normally. <span style="color: blue">—</span> ] <sup><span style="font-size:80%">⋠]⋡</span></sup> 17:43, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
			::::::::I wouldn't consider that an attack, just an observation. I made sound cases for all of my edits. ] (]) 17:47, 22 November 2022 (UTC)