Misplaced Pages

23 April 2007

• curprev 18:0018:00, 23 April 2007 Retired username talk contribs m 2,147 bytes 0 Reverted edits by 82.23.84.39 (talk) to last version by 74.138.238.88
• curprev 17:4717:47, 23 April 2007 82.23.84.39 talk 2,147 bytes 0 Undid revision 125227834 by 74.138.238.88 (talk)
• curprev 17:3117:31, 23 April 2007 74.138.238.88 talk 2,147 bytes 0 rv change of years of practice, no agreement to do this
• curprev 16:5716:57, 23 April 2007 Majorly talk contribs 2,147 bytes 0 why would the points need numbering? It's consensus, not vote counting
• curprev 15:5715:57, 23 April 2007 Haukurth talk contribs 2,147 bytes +9 Well, we've had a tally for a long time because many of us think it's useful. If a tally isn't possible in a discussion then presumably this is something more than a discussion.
• curprev 15:5415:54, 23 April 2007 Majorly talk contribs 2,138 bytes −23 rm tally - how can one have a tally in a discussion? Tallies were added without consensus of any kind back in 2003/4 by Ed Poor
• curprev 15:4115:41, 23 April 2007 Majorly talk contribs 2,161 bytes +14 there was no consensus to include a tally on top of a discussion]
• curprev 15:3115:31, 23 April 2007 Retired username talk contribs 2,147 bytes −14 there was not really a consensus in all that discussion... lots of opposition
• curprev 13:5213:52, 23 April 2007 Amarkov talk contribs 2,161 bytes −117 people can oppose for whatever they wish
• curprev 13:3913:39, 23 April 2007 Hex talk contribs 2,278 bytes +117 Further note to participants reinforcing the optional nature of the questions.

22 April 2007

• curprev 23:3223:32, 22 April 2007 Gaillimh talk contribs 2,161 bytes −37 - protection (admins only ones engaging in an edit war, so protection is ineffective)
• curprev 23:3123:31, 22 April 2007 Gaillimh talk contribs m 2,198 bytes 0 Protected Template:RfA: protection not doing anything to prevent edit wars, as admins are the one's engaging in said war, hehe
• curprev 22:3022:30, 22 April 2007 Cbrown1023 talk contribs m 2,198 bytes 0 Protected Template:RfA: edit war
• curprev 22:3022:30, 22 April 2007 Cbrown1023 talk contribs 2,198 bytes +37 {{protected}}
• curprev 22:2922:29, 22 April 2007 Pascal.Tesson talk contribs 2,161 bytes +239 Let's not start an edit war over this. Discussion is going on at WT:RFA
• curprev 22:2622:26, 22 April 2007 Majorly talk contribs 1,922 bytes −239 It doesn't matter how long they have been here, the fact is they shouldn't be
• curprev 21:3321:33, 22 April 2007 Amarkov talk contribs 2,161 bytes +239 seeing as those sections have been here for two years...
• curprev 15:4715:47, 22 April 2007 Majorly talk contribs 1,922 bytes −239 rm pointless sections, not needed in a discussion
• curprev 00:1800:18, 22 April 2007 Stephen Bain talk contribs 2,161 bytes +14 there was heaps of discussion at WT:RFA

21 April 2007

• curprev 17:1217:12, 21 April 2007 Agent 86 talk contribs 2,147 bytes −14 moving tally back to top - no consensus was reached, no discussion was held on the move.

20 April 2007

• curprev 23:4823:48, 20 April 2007 Picaroon talk contribs 2,161 bytes +15 making it clearer that the questions are optional - maybe blink tags and size 48 chiller font if people still don't understand
• curprev 17:0617:06, 20 April 2007 Majorly talk contribs 2,146 bytes −9 rm tally, RFA is not a vote. The totals suffice, at the bottom
• curprev 16:4216:42, 20 April 2007 Christopher Parham talk contribs 2,155 bytes +9 adding "if anyleading question implies a committment to taking part in admin work is necessary
• curprev 16:2716:27, 20 April 2007 Agent 86 talk contribs 2,146 bytes +9 There are over a years' worth of discussions on this issue at Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for adminship without consensus to remove
• curprev 12:3212:32, 20 April 2007 Kusma talk contribs 2,137 bytes +157 If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review ] before commenting.
• curprev 00:4700:47, 20 April 2007 Kim Bruning talk contribs 1,980 bytes −10 rv, couldn't find talk page message by previous editor.
• curprev 00:3800:38, 20 April 2007 Agent 86 talk contribs 1,990 bytes +10 restoring tallies - this has been discussed for over a year and there has been no consensus to remove

19 April 2007

• curprev 22:2322:23, 19 April 2007 Majorly talk contribs 1,980 bytes −39 no one objected for four days; do this only if there is a problem, we don't need unnecessary discussion
• curprev 22:2122:21, 19 April 2007 Prodego talk contribs m 2,019 bytes +3 readd obvious change
• curprev 22:1522:15, 19 April 2007 Prodego talk contribs 2,016 bytes +36 let's get consensus here, before we change the layout of one of our most important processes. Template talk:RfA. Restore 29 March 2007 version.

15 April 2007

• curprev 13:1913:19, 15 April 2007 Majorly talk contribs m 1,980 bytes +7 more like this...
• curprev 13:1713:17, 15 April 2007 Majorly talk contribs 1,973 bytes −57 boldly updated questions area
• curprev 13:0513:05, 15 April 2007 Majorly talk contribs m 2,030 bytes 0 →[]: even better
• curprev 13:0013:00, 15 April 2007 BenAveling talk contribs 2,030 bytes +14 Maybe if we put it at the end, the is-a-vote crowd can go looking for it, and the not-a-vote crowd (including me) will be slightly happier than before. I've even bolded it.

14 April 2007

• curprev 23:0923:09, 14 April 2007 Haukurth talk contribs 2,016 bytes +14 I think it's very convenient to have this there

13 April 2007

• curprev 11:4611:46, 13 April 2007 Stephen Bain talk contribs 2,002 bytes −14 per discussion on WT:RFA and my talk; many people have supported, only one person has disagreed and they didn't provide a reason

12 April 2007

• curprev 23:1923:19, 12 April 2007 Xaosflux talk contribs 2,016 bytes +14 rv, widely used template, lets establish consensus on the talk page
• curprev 15:5515:55, 12 April 2007 Stephen Bain talk contribs 2,002 bytes −14 yeah but really, it's not a vote
• curprev 15:3515:35, 12 April 2007 Kingboyk talk contribs m 2,016 bytes +14 Reverted edits by Thebainer (talk) to last version by Kim Bruning
• curprev 15:2215:22, 12 April 2007 Stephen Bain talk contribs 2,002 bytes −14 not a vote

29 March 2007

• curprev 08:3708:37, 29 March 2007 Kim Bruning talk contribs 2,016 bytes −369 buck stops here. (no editcount in the actual on-wiki template. We only tolerate end-runs this far folks, don't get cheeky)
• curprev 04:2904:29, 29 March 2007 Amarkov talk contribs 2,385 bytes +369 seemed to be no objections
• curprev 03:4603:46, 29 March 2007 Amarkov talk contribs 2,016 bytes −315 again, revert pending completed discussion at WT:RFA
• curprev 03:4403:44, 29 March 2007 Amarkov talk contribs 2,331 bytes +315 coding in Mathbot's line so it's in page history, will revert until WT:RFA discussion is complete
• curprev 00:1700:17, 29 March 2007 Majorly talk contribs 2,016 bytes −204 slim down question 1, seems to be agreement in discussion here

28 February 2007

• curprev 10:5510:55, 28 February 2007 Kusma talk contribs 2,220 bytes −36 rm non-admin backlog question, see Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for adminship

26 February 2007

• curprev 05:0505:05, 26 February 2007 Amarkov talk contribs m 2,256 bytes −1 rm annoying return character

10 February 2007

• curprev 20:2320:23, 10 February 2007 Picaroon talk contribs 2,257 bytes −1 better placement

6 February 2007

• curprev 04:1304:13, 6 February 2007 Selmo talk contribs m 2,258 bytes +1 line break
• curprev 04:1204:12, 6 February 2007 Selmo talk contribs 2,257 bytes +1 better here, revert if anyone disagrees