Misplaced Pages

25 February 2009

• curprev 14:0414:04, 25 February 2009 Mwalla talk contribs 45,750 bytes +32 Continued vandalism undo
• curprev 01:2501:25, 25 February 2009 The Sceptical Chymist talk contribs 45,718 bytes −32 separate paragraph for critical reviews undo

24 February 2009

• curprev 15:0915:09, 24 February 2009 Mwalla talk contribs 45,750 bytes +444 NPOV added reference to a more balanced source undo
• curprev 03:0103:01, 24 February 2009 The Sceptical Chymist talk contribs 45,306 bytes +59 restored the full quotation from the source undo

23 February 2009

• curprev 14:5214:52, 23 February 2009 Mwalla talk contribs 45,247 bytes +195 removed opinion statement, inserted fact based statement undo

22 February 2009

• curprev 21:0321:03, 22 February 2009 The Sceptical Chymist talk contribs 45,052 bytes +1,479 Rv per WP:BETTER#Lead section: "The lead should establish significance, include mention of notable criticism or controversies." This is the most stable version, which was present for several month undo
• curprev 13:4613:46, 22 February 2009 Mwalla talk contribs 43,573 bytes −1,479 NPOV see talk undo
• curprev 13:3013:30, 22 February 2009 The Sceptical Chymist talk contribs 45,052 bytes +249 Rvv per WP:BETTER#Lead section: "The lead should establish significance, include mention of notable criticism or controversies." This is the most stable version, which was present for several month undo

21 February 2009

• curprev 14:5214:52, 21 February 2009 Mwalla talk contribs 44,803 bytes −522 Keep it simple stupid, NPOV undo
• curprev 14:4714:47, 21 February 2009 Mwalla talk contribs 45,325 bytes +273 lets not be unduly "skeptical" undo
• curprev 11:2711:27, 21 February 2009 The Sceptical Chymist talk contribs 45,052 bytes −273 Lead should summarize the content of the article. The data and the reviews are already discussed in the body of the article. There is no need to move their summation down from the lead. undo
• curprev 04:5204:52, 21 February 2009 Ask123 talk contribs 45,325 bytes +273 The sentence on the criticisms of Cymbalta suggest that they are more prominent & numerous than they actually are. Also, please be specific in which "critical reviews" you're referring to. Tag placed. undo
• curprev 02:3802:38, 21 February 2009 The Sceptical Chymist talk contribs 45,052 bytes +131 Lets present the positive side more undo
• curprev 02:2502:25, 21 February 2009 The Sceptical Chymist talk contribs 44,921 bytes +1,479 Rv POV change based only on the assertion that drug is prescribed, therefore it has no downsides. Current lead presents both positive and negative opinions undo

20 February 2009

• curprev 17:0717:07, 20 February 2009 Mwalla talk contribs 43,442 bytes −1,479 Lead is too controversial, the drug remains popular despite these scare tactics, see talk and subsections undo

19 February 2009

• curprev 12:4512:45, 19 February 2009 SmackBot talk contribs m 44,921 bytes +32 Date maintenance tags and general fixes undo

16 February 2009

• curprev 20:4420:44, 16 February 2009 BoomerAB talk contribs m 44,889 bytes +30 Added {{expert}} tag to article. using Friendly undo

15 February 2009

• curprev 17:5417:54, 15 February 2009 Literaturegeek talk contribs 44,859 bytes −285 →Discontinuation syndrome: Hmm fluoxetine would only partially cover withdrawal due to lack of effect on noradrenaline. Definitely need a citation to say it is recommended medically. Removing. undo

9 February 2009

• curprev 21:0421:04, 9 February 2009 Nihiltres talk contribs m 45,144 bytes +4 move amboxes to top to avoid overlapping the infobox, and change protection template to reflect (non-)expiry of protection undo

8 February 2009

• curprev 00:4000:40, 8 February 2009 Jfdwolff talk contribs m 45,140 bytes 0 Protected Duloxetine: Edit warring / Content dispute ( (indefinite) (indefinite)) undo
• curprev 00:4000:40, 8 February 2009 Jfdwolff talk contribs 45,140 bytes +7 protecting - low-grade edit war between anons undo

6 February 2009

• curprev 11:3111:31, 6 February 2009 71.244.121.113 talk 45,133 bytes +1,323 The overwhelming majority of the studies (see the chapters of this article) support the conclusion that for SUI and MDD other treatments are more or equally efficaceous with less side effects undo
• curprev 07:0507:05, 6 February 2009 67.160.162.79 talk 43,810 bytes −1,323 As discussed in 'talk' these are cherry picked quotes that dont belong in the intro paragrapgh undo
• curprev 03:1803:18, 6 February 2009 71.244.121.113 talk 45,133 bytes +2,191 rv vandalism undo

5 February 2009

• curprev 15:0415:04, 5 February 2009 161.150.2.55 talk 42,942 bytes −1,479 moved unsubstantiated content to sub section undo
• curprev 15:0315:03, 5 February 2009 161.150.2.55 talk 44,421 bytes −712 rv vandalism by 71.244.121.113 undo
• curprev 10:1110:11, 5 February 2009 194.60.106.38 talk 45,133 bytes +19 +fr:Duloxétine undo

4 February 2009

• curprev 03:3703:37, 4 February 2009 71.244.121.113 talk 45,114 bytes +1,039 critical reviews in DTB and Prescrire undo
• curprev 03:0603:06, 4 February 2009 71.244.121.113 talk 44,075 bytes +712 →Major depressive disorder: new comparative analysis of antidepressants undo
• curprev 02:4202:42, 4 February 2009 71.244.121.113 talk 43,363 bytes +2,448 →Indications: Section on MDD somehow got deleted. Restoring undo
• curprev 02:2202:22, 4 February 2009 71.244.121.113 talk 40,915 bytes −241 →Stress urinary incontinence: copyedit undo
• curprev 02:1802:18, 4 February 2009 71.244.121.113 talk 41,156 bytes +2,332 →Stress urinary incontinence: comparison of duloxetine with pelvic floor excercise undo

3 February 2009

• curprev 23:3723:37, 3 February 2009 71.244.121.113 talk 38,824 bytes +2,165 Reverted 2 edits by 161.150.2.55 identified as vandalism to last revision by 71.244.121.113. undo
• curprev 15:4515:45, 3 February 2009 161.150.2.55 talk 36,659 bytes −841 removing biased information undo
• curprev 15:4315:43, 3 February 2009 161.150.2.55 talk 37,500 bytes −1,324 rv vandalism undo
• curprev 11:3511:35, 3 February 2009 71.244.121.113 talk 38,824 bytes +841 Prescrire's review of duloxetine undo
• curprev 11:1011:10, 3 February 2009 71.244.121.113 talk 37,983 bytes +1,324 There is no "controversy" that duloxetine is not as effective as existing treatments for SUI or depression and has more side effects undo
• curprev 05:4305:43, 3 February 2009 67.160.162.79 talk 36,659 bytes −1,324 No edit summary undo
• curprev 02:0102:01, 3 February 2009 71.244.121.113 talk 37,983 bytes +583 →Stress urinary incontinence: AHRQ report undo
• curprev 01:3801:38, 3 February 2009 71.244.121.113 talk 37,400 bytes +580 →Stress urinary incontinence: correcting text to reflect the refs undo

1 February 2009

• curprev 00:4600:46, 1 February 2009 71.244.121.113 talk 36,820 bytes +1,480 Undid revision 267639091 by 67.160.162.79 Rv deletiion. Both positive and negative views should be presented, see Talk undo

31 January 2009

• curprev 15:5615:56, 31 January 2009 67.160.162.79 talk 35,340 bytes −1,480 poorly supported bias. Explained the first time undo
• curprev 12:1012:10, 31 January 2009 71.244.121.113 talk 36,820 bytes +1,479 Undid revision 267559857 by 67.160.162.79 (talk)Rv unexplained deletion undo
• curprev 06:0006:00, 31 January 2009 67.160.162.79 talk 35,341 bytes −1,479 does not belong in into 'graph.articles cited offer no evidence of ineffectiveness. undo

28 January 2009

• curprev 16:4016:40, 28 January 2009 24.5.21.84 talk 36,820 bytes +1 Mydriasis is not dilation of the iris (the colored part of the eye), but rather the dilation of the pupil. Thus, I changed "mydriasis (dilation of the iris)" to "mydriasis (dilation of the pupil)" undo

27 January 2009

• curprev 06:2306:23, 27 January 2009 64.252.202.44 talk 36,819 bytes −1 →Pharmacology undo

24 January 2009

• curprev 11:3711:37, 24 January 2009 71.244.121.113 talk 36,820 bytes +158 Undid revision 265909434 by 64.83.203.120 (talk) Rv unexplained deletion undo

23 January 2009

• curprev 13:3013:30, 23 January 2009 64.83.203.120 talk 36,662 bytes −158 No edit summary undo

22 January 2009

• curprev 00:0000:00, 22 January 2009 Xqbot talk contribs m 36,820 bytes +19 robot Adding: pl:Duloksetyna undo

21 January 2009

• curprev 10:3910:39, 21 January 2009 71.244.121.113 talk 36,801 bytes +1,479 restored the summation of side effects vs benefits based on several independent reviews undo