Misplaced Pages

9 August 2009

• curprev 17:2417:24, 9 August 2009 Nishkid64 talk contribs m 25,226 bytes 0 Protected Richard Lindzen: Sockpuppetry abuse. ( (expires 17:24, 23 August 2009 (UTC)) (expires 17:24, 23 August 2009 (UTC))) undo
• curprev 08:4308:43, 9 August 2009 Ratel talk contribs m 25,226 bytes −53 Reverted edits by A Wierd and Wonderful World (talk) to last version by Oren0 undo
• curprev 08:1008:10, 9 August 2009 A Wierd and Wonderful World talk contribs 25,279 bytes +53 Violation of WP:POV and WP:BLP undo
• curprev 02:3502:35, 9 August 2009 Oren0 talk contribs 25,226 bytes −53 →Consulting fees and Funding sources of other organizations: Tweak language. The source only lists him as a "contributor" to these think tanks rather than a member. Also, these two only have Exxon listed, not Chrysler. undo

8 August 2009

• curprev 14:5214:52, 8 August 2009 KimDabelsteinPetersen talk contribs 25,279 bytes +88 Reverted to revision 306777063 by Ratel; rv Sorry - but this is what reliable sources say. BLP doesn't preclude critique or other information - it just requires that it is adequately sourced.. using TW undo
• curprev 14:2714:27, 8 August 2009 Stephen Boltzmann talk contribs 25,191 bytes −88 Undid revision 306777063 by Ratel (talk) Inappropriate for BLP (see discussion) undo
• curprev 11:1811:18, 8 August 2009 Ratel talk contribs 25,279 bytes +88 Reverted to revision 306711957 by GoRight; rvt scibaby sock. (TW) undo
• curprev 05:1305:13, 8 August 2009 Stephen Boltzmann talk contribs 25,191 bytes −88 →Consulting fees and Funding sources of other organizations: Removed gratutitous assertion/POV language that is only tangentially related to the subject article undo
• curprev 01:1901:19, 8 August 2009 GoRight talk contribs 25,279 bytes +309 →Consulting fees and Funding sources of other organizations undo
• curprev 00:5100:51, 8 August 2009 GoRight talk contribs 24,970 bytes +44 →Consulting fees and Funding sources of other organizations: - Fix section title. The original was WP:SYN. undo

7 August 2009

• curprev 17:3517:35, 7 August 2009 Nathan Johnson talk contribs 24,926 bytes +14 →Industry links: per the source undo
• curprev 15:0215:02, 7 August 2009 KimDabelsteinPetersen talk contribs 24,912 bytes −340 undo GoRight. Yep, it is certainly allowed. Your text is original research, and quite apparently to water things down. This *is* what the reference says (which is a secondary source) undo
• curprev 13:5413:54, 7 August 2009 Threeafterthree talk contribs 25,252 bytes −34 rm unsourced cat and info box undo
• curprev 13:5213:52, 7 August 2009 Threeafterthree talk contribs 25,286 bytes −21 →See also: rm, already linked in lead undo
• curprev 13:5113:51, 7 August 2009 Threeafterthree talk contribs 25,307 bytes −10 added nationality to lead undo
• curprev 06:5806:58, 7 August 2009 GoRight talk contribs 25,317 bytes −4 →Industry links: - Tweak. undo
• curprev 06:5606:56, 7 August 2009 GoRight talk contribs 25,321 bytes +344 →Industry links: - No inter alia cherry picking allowed. undo
• curprev 06:3406:34, 7 August 2009 Ratel talk contribs 24,977 bytes −586 simplify undo
• curprev 06:3006:30, 7 August 2009 GoRight talk contribs 25,563 bytes +572 →Industry links: - The solution to pollution is dilution. undo

4 August 2009

• curprev 10:2210:22, 4 August 2009 KimDabelsteinPetersen talk contribs 24,991 bytes +99 Reverted to revision 305309760 by Brian A Schmidt; rv citing WP:BURDEN is rather odd here. Since the Frontline article states this quite clearly... Now it may be undue weight (or something else) but the "burd undo
• curprev 07:3907:39, 4 August 2009 Alexh19740110 talk contribs 24,892 bytes −99 Reverted to revision 305002726 by Alexh19740110; pls see WP:PROVEIT; burden of proof is on the editor including negative material. see talk.. (TW) undo

31 July 2009

• curprev 18:2018:20, 31 July 2009 Brian A Schmidt talk contribs 24,991 bytes +99 Undid revision 305002726 by Alexh19740110 (talk)relevant info similar to that in prev paragraph undo

30 July 2009

• curprev 03:0603:06, 30 July 2009 Alexh19740110 talk contribs 24,892 bytes −99 mv "Cato" and "Marshall Institute" to career section; rm mention of accepting money from Exxon, more relevant to the Exxon article. See talk. undo

26 July 2009

• curprev 11:5711:57, 26 July 2009 Alexh19740110 talk contribs 24,991 bytes +8 →Media appearances: - fix remark misattributed as direct quote to Gray; style, punctuation, reword. BTW would support readding "views of other scientists" section for this material. undo
• curprev 03:3303:33, 26 July 2009 Enescot talk contribs 24,983 bytes +37 →Media appearances: redirected links for William Gray and John Wallace to the correct Misplaced Pages articles undo
• curprev 00:4900:49, 26 July 2009 Enescot talk contribs 24,946 bytes +4,804 Wrote more on Lindzen's contributions to mainstream media publications, and what other scientists think about Lindzen's views. Sources are the New York Times, Newsweek, and Spiegel undo

23 July 2009

• curprev 16:4916:49, 23 July 2009 Oren0 talk contribs 20,142 bytes −6,715 →Views of other scientists: Removing section again. There has still been no explanation how a section with zero secondary sources could possibly carry WP:WEIGHT. See talk. undo
• curprev 10:5610:56, 23 July 2009 Alexh19740110 talk contribs 26,857 bytes +608 →Views of other scientists: -- restored some context to Houghton's quotes. undo

22 July 2009

• curprev 21:2021:20, 22 July 2009 KimDabelsteinPetersen talk contribs 26,249 bytes −16 →See also: cut Exxon see also. What on Earth is that supposed to mean... (collateral damage from reverts) undo
• curprev 10:1310:13, 22 July 2009 KimDabelsteinPetersen talk contribs 26,265 bytes +6,122 Reverted to revision 303476293 by Raul654; rv Schneider and Houghton are the connecting refs, there is no SYN. WV Feedback and sensitivity *is* Lindzen's major arguments!. using TW undo
• curprev 05:4205:42, 22 July 2009 Alexh19740110 talk contribs 20,143 bytes −15 →See also: - rm "see also ExxonMobil" -- is this someone's idea of a joke? undo
• curprev 05:4105:41, 22 July 2009 Alexh19740110 talk contribs 20,158 bytes −6,107 Reverted to revision 303371644 by Oren0; Oren0 & I have given numerous reasons including BLP, pls discuss on talk.. (TW) undo
• curprev 05:0405:04, 22 July 2009 Raul654 talk contribs 26,265 bytes +6,107 rv deletion using false BLP claims undo

21 July 2009

• curprev 17:2717:27, 21 July 2009 Oren0 talk contribs 20,158 bytes −6,107 →Views of other scientists: Removing section for now per WP:WEIGHT, WP:SYN, WP:PRIMARY, and WP:BLP. See talk. undo
• curprev 17:1417:14, 21 July 2009 Oren0 talk contribs 26,265 bytes −448 Remove RealClimate link per WP:BLP: "Never use self-published books, zines, websites, webforums, blogs or tweets as sources for material about a living person, unless written or published by the subject of the biographical material." undo
• curprev 16:5616:56, 21 July 2009 Nathan Johnson talk contribs 26,713 bytes −30 →Houghton and Schmidt: no reason for subheading undo
• curprev 16:5216:52, 21 July 2009 Nathan Johnson talk contribs 26,743 bytes +6,601 Reverted 2 edits by Alexh19740110; No reason for removal besides IDONTLIKEIT. (TW) undo
• curprev 15:4015:40, 21 July 2009 Alexh19740110 talk contribs 20,142 bytes −6,585 rm again, pls consider comments on talk before readding, if you want to make this page a debate, I'll win it. Let's not go there. Page is Lindzen's bio. Thanks. undo
• curprev 15:3815:38, 21 July 2009 Alexh19740110 talk contribs 26,727 bytes −16 →See also: rm irrelevant, biasing link to ExxonMobil page... undo
• curprev 15:1615:16, 21 July 2009 Nathan Johnson talk contribs 26,743 bytes +6,585 rv; response by scientists to Lindzen is appropriate for a biography on Lindzen undo
• curprev 11:2111:21, 21 July 2009 66.91.190.100 talk 20,158 bytes +81 added further context and biographical information not represented in article undo
• curprev 02:2002:20, 21 July 2009 Alexh19740110 talk contribs 20,077 bytes −6,585 rm WP:COATRACK, this is not meant to be an essay, quotes cherry-picked, Lindzen's responses not given... L has some choice responses to Stephen H. Schneider, I don't think we want that. undo

17 July 2009

• curprev 10:5410:54, 17 July 2009 KimDabelsteinPetersen talk contribs 26,662 bytes −16 Reverted to revision 301664812 by Enescot; rv theory is a word to avoid. It means different things in science and in daily language. using TW undo
• curprev 10:2410:24, 17 July 2009 Andreidewhirst talk contribs 26,678 bytes +16 clarification of intended colloquial meaning undo

12 July 2009

• curprev 08:3708:37, 12 July 2009 Enescot talk contribs 26,662 bytes +2,729 Added info to global warming section on views of other scientists. The information refers to Lindzen's estimate of climate sensitivity as compared to estimates by other experts. undo
• curprev 08:1608:16, 12 July 2009 William M. Connolley talk contribs 23,933 bytes +152 rv: unsure whether the money matters, but deleting the mashall folk is definitely wrong undo
• curprev 08:0008:00, 12 July 2009 Pat Wynnon talk contribs 23,781 bytes −152 This is really not germane, and is POV undo

11 July 2009

• curprev 05:4305:43, 11 July 2009 Enescot talk contribs m 23,933 bytes −19 →Views of other scientists: corrected misdirected link to Gavin Schmidt's comments on Lindzen undo
• curprev 00:5800:58, 11 July 2009 Enescot talk contribs 23,952 bytes +3,875 Added new sub-section on 'Views of other scientists' in section on global warming. This includes comments on Lindzen's views by climate scientists SIr John Houghton and Gavin Schmidt undo

10 July 2009

• curprev 17:0317:03, 10 July 2009 75.72.161.33 talk 20,077 bytes 0 No edit summary undo