Misplaced Pages

5 July 2010

• curprev 19:4419:44, 5 July 2010 Tnxman307 talk contribs m 21,485 bytes +2,979 Reverted to revision 367622978 by SlimVirgin; restore all the way back, dispute protection. Using Twinkle undo
• curprev 15:2915:29, 5 July 2010 Sennen goroshi talk contribs 18,506 bytes −882 see talk page. undo
• curprev 06:3906:39, 5 July 2010 Hkwon talk contribs 19,388 bytes +882 Undid revision 371658990 by Melonbarmonster2 (talk) Do not delete relevant information based on multiple reliable sources. undo

4 July 2010

• curprev 05:5005:50, 4 July 2010 Melonbarmonster2 talk contribs 18,506 bytes −882 unilateral edits removed per talk page undo
• curprev 04:1204:12, 4 July 2010 Hkwon talk contribs 19,388 bytes +882 Restored relevant info based on reliable sources and deleted info based on a broken link undo
• curprev 02:4402:44, 4 July 2010 Melonbarmonster2 talk contribs 18,506 bytes −1,068 Inappropriate for intro and condex issue has already been resolved. undo
• curprev 00:3300:33, 4 July 2010 Hkwon talk contribs 19,574 bytes +569 See talk page undo

3 July 2010

• curprev 23:5523:55, 3 July 2010 Hkwon talk contribs 19,005 bytes +499 Undid revision 370247710 by Sennen goroshi (talk) Do not delete relevant information based on multiple reliable sources undo
• curprev 15:2515:25, 3 July 2010 Sennen goroshi talk contribs 18,506 bytes −320 actually, after reading the source, I have decided to delete it all. Consensus was against including references to Codex in the lead. this is just an attempt to sneak Codex into the lead. undo
• curprev 14:5614:56, 3 July 2010 Sennen goroshi talk contribs 18,826 bytes −3 grammar mistake. recognition is a countable item?? I don't think so. undo
• curprev 10:1310:13, 3 July 2010 Hkwon talk contribs 18,829 bytes −2 No edit summary undo
• curprev 09:5509:55, 3 July 2010 Hkwon talk contribs 18,831 bytes +325 No edit summary undo

30 June 2010

• curprev 00:3500:35, 30 June 2010 Erianna talk contribs m 18,506 bytes +2 →History undo

28 June 2010

• curprev 02:2202:22, 28 June 2010 Qwyrxian talk contribs 18,504 bytes −2,455 Removed section was based entirely upon an unreliable source; see Talk Page for more details undo

26 June 2010

• curprev 13:1413:14, 26 June 2010 Sennen goroshi talk contribs 20,959 bytes −499 see talk page. undo
• curprev 06:2506:25, 26 June 2010 Hkwon talk contribs 21,458 bytes +499 Undid revision 370032844 by Melonbarmonster2(talk)Present a reliable source showing Kimchi is unfermented food before deleting undo

25 June 2010

• curprev 04:1104:11, 25 June 2010 Melonbarmonster2 talk contribs 20,959 bytes −499 Kimchi is exclusively a fermented food as many nonfermented varieties exist. References also do not support the claim that kimchi is only fermented. undo

22 June 2010

• curprev 06:4106:41, 22 June 2010 Qwyrxian talk contribs 21,458 bytes −238 Undid revision 369500699 by Hkwon (talk) Current consensus on the talk is that the information should not be included; if consensus shifts, re-add undo
• curprev 06:0406:04, 22 June 2010 Hkwon talk contribs 21,696 bytes +238 Undid revision 369496080 by Qwyrxian (talk) See talk page for the counter-evidence of your argument. Also, we gathering for a consensus. undo
• curprev 05:1505:15, 22 June 2010 Qwyrxian talk contribs 21,458 bytes −238 Undid revision 369495647 by Hkwon (talk) The information is more than irrelevant--it doesn't make sense--see talk page undo
• curprev 05:1005:10, 22 June 2010 Hkwon talk contribs 21,696 bytes +238 Undid revision 369364227 by Kjoonlee (talk) Show why the information is irrelevant and not good citation before you delete it. undo

21 June 2010

• curprev 14:3014:30, 21 June 2010 Kjoonlee talk contribs 21,458 bytes −238 Undid revision 369346137 by Hkwon (talk) irrelevant, not good citation, bad summary undo
• curprev 12:1512:15, 21 June 2010 Hkwon talk contribs 21,696 bytes +238 Undid revision 369306644 by Sennen goroshi (talk)Do not delete relevant and correctly cited information without a counter-evidence undo
• curprev 07:5807:58, 21 June 2010 122.57.109.242 talk 21,458 bytes −34 No edit summary undo
• curprev 07:5707:57, 21 June 2010 122.57.109.242 talk 21,492 bytes +6 No edit summary undo
• curprev 07:5707:57, 21 June 2010 122.57.109.242 talk 21,486 bytes +28 No edit summary undo
• curprev 05:4505:45, 21 June 2010 Sennen goroshi talk contribs 21,458 bytes −238 going by the talk page, there seems to be clear consensus. You are the only person wanting the CODEX crap included. undo

20 June 2010

• curprev 19:5419:54, 20 June 2010 Hkwon talk contribs 21,696 bytes +238 Do not delete relevant and correctly cited information without a counter-evidence or a consensus. undo
• curprev 01:2401:24, 20 June 2010 DumbBOT talk contribs 21,458 bytes −27 removing a protection template from a non-protected page (info) undo

12 June 2010

• curprev 16:2516:25, 12 June 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs 21,485 bytes +27 {{pp-protected|small=yes}} undo
• curprev 16:2516:25, 12 June 2010 SlimVirgin talk contribs m 21,458 bytes 0 Protected Kimchi: content dispute per RfPP ( (expires 16:25, 19 June 2010 (UTC)) (expires 16:25, 19 June 2010 (UTC))) undo
• curprev 16:0416:04, 12 June 2010 Sennen goroshi talk contribs 21,458 bytes −34 better undo
• curprev 16:0316:03, 12 June 2010 Sennen goroshi talk contribs 21,492 bytes −223 not relevant. and most certainly not deserving of a place in the lead. undo
• curprev 15:4115:41, 12 June 2010 Hkwon talk contribs 21,715 bytes +223 Undid revision 367606499 by Kjoonlee (talk) rv deletion of relevantly cited fact. See talk page undo
• curprev 13:5813:58, 12 June 2010 Kjoonlee talk contribs 21,492 bytes −223 Deleted unhelpful info undo
• curprev 05:3105:31, 12 June 2010 Hkwon talk contribs 21,715 bytes +257 Undid revision 367406703 by Kjoonlee (talk) rv deletion of relevant information from reliable source. See talk page. undo

11 June 2010

• curprev 11:5711:57, 11 June 2010 Kjoonlee talk contribs 21,458 bytes −257 Removing CODEX stuff. How does it help the article?? And yes, I'm Korean. undo

10 June 2010

• curprev 17:1117:11, 10 June 2010 Hkwon talk contribs 21,715 bytes +224 1) rv deletion of relevant cited fact. 2) The American University article does not say anything about Koreans thinking Japanese Kimchi "inferior". undo

9 June 2010

• curprev 16:3216:32, 9 June 2010 EvanHarper talk contribs 21,491 bytes +231 restoring neutral summary of dispute undo
• curprev 16:2716:27, 9 June 2010 EvanHarper talk contribs 21,260 bytes −258 per talk undo

2 June 2010

• curprev 01:4601:46, 2 June 2010 Enigmaman talk contribs m 21,518 bytes −7 Reverted edits by 219.238.212.126 (talk) to last version by Visik undo
• curprev 01:2901:29, 2 June 2010 219.238.212.126 talk 21,525 bytes +7 No edit summary undo

1 June 2010

• curprev 05:2605:26, 1 June 2010 Visik talk contribs 21,518 bytes +10 →External links: added relevant template undo

31 May 2010

• curprev 13:0213:02, 31 May 2010 Hkwon talk contribs 21,508 bytes +465 Added more references undo

30 May 2010

• curprev 00:5400:54, 30 May 2010 70.79.216.29 talk 21,043 bytes +1 →Main ingredients undo

28 May 2010

• curprev 03:1403:14, 28 May 2010 Kintetsubuffalo talk contribs m 21,042 bytes −30 Reverted edits by 173.48.241.186 (talk) to last version by 204.38.189.23 undo

27 May 2010

• curprev 19:2319:23, 27 May 2010 173.48.241.186 talk 21,072 bytes +30 No edit summary undo

26 May 2010

• curprev 15:0515:05, 26 May 2010 204.38.189.23 talk 21,042 bytes +2 →Kimchi varieties undo
• curprev 15:0215:02, 26 May 2010 204.38.189.23 talk 21,040 bytes −1 →Main ingredients undo
• curprev 15:0115:01, 26 May 2010 204.38.189.23 talk 21,041 bytes +11 →History undo