Misplaced Pages

1 July 2012

• curprev 21:2221:22, 1 July 2012 Guillaume2303 talk contribs 5,049 bytes −13 tweak; a question in an interview... undo
• curprev 18:2318:23, 1 July 2012 194.78.195.29 talk 5,062 bytes +30 No edit summary undo
• curprev 18:1218:12, 1 July 2012 194.78.195.29 talk 5,032 bytes +488 Jeffrey J Williams quote about no submissions undo

29 June 2012

• curprev 23:3123:31, 29 June 2012 Steve Quinn talk contribs 4,544 bytes +592 Undid revision 499973804 by 92.140.76.234 a POV edit unsubstantiated by proper sourcing and references. Revert to previous edit by User:Guillaume2303 undo
• curprev 22:3322:33, 29 June 2012 92.140.76.234 talk 3,952 bytes −592 Reverting Guillaume2303 censorship undo
• curprev 22:1322:13, 29 June 2012 Guillaume2303 talk contribs 4,544 bytes +591 Undid revision 499969254 by 92.140.76.234 (talk) undo
• curprev 21:5021:50, 29 June 2012 92.140.76.234 talk 3,953 bytes −591 reverting the persistent POV problems with Guillaume's edits undo
• curprev 21:4521:45, 29 June 2012 Guillaume2303 talk contribs 4,544 bytes +592 persistent vandalism undo
• curprev 21:4321:43, 29 June 2012 92.140.76.234 talk 3,952 bytes −19 forgot to take out "aggrandizement" undo
• curprev 21:4321:43, 29 June 2012 92.140.76.234 talk 3,971 bytes −573 Revert vandalism, POV undo
• curprev 21:3321:33, 29 June 2012 Guillaume2303 talk contribs 4,544 bytes +626 correct revert undo
• curprev 21:3021:30, 29 June 2012 Guillaume2303 talk contribs 3,918 bytes −10 vandalism undo
• curprev 21:2621:26, 29 June 2012 92.140.76.234 talk 3,928 bytes +29 No edit summary undo
• curprev 21:2521:25, 29 June 2012 92.140.76.234 talk 3,899 bytes −19 No edit summary undo
• curprev 21:1821:18, 29 June 2012 92.140.76.234 talk 3,918 bytes −626 Undid revision 499882732 by Guillaume2303 (talk) undo
• curprev 09:3209:32, 29 June 2012 Guillaume2303 talk contribs 4,544 bytes +626 revert vandalism undo
• curprev 08:0108:01, 29 June 2012 92.140.76.234 talk 3,918 bytes −24 No edit summary undo
• curprev 07:2707:27, 29 June 2012 92.140.76.234 talk 3,942 bytes +148 No edit summary undo
• curprev 07:2107:21, 29 June 2012 92.140.76.234 talk 3,794 bytes −1 No edit summary undo
• curprev 07:2007:20, 29 June 2012 92.140.76.234 talk 3,795 bytes −749 No edit summary undo

4 June 2012

• curprev 13:4113:41, 4 June 2012 Rich Farmbrough talk contribs 4,544 bytes +43 No edit summary undo
• curprev 05:0605:06, 4 June 2012 Guillaume2303 talk contribs 4,501 bytes +263 vandalism undo
• curprev 04:2804:28, 4 June 2012 Academic PHD talk contribs 4,238 bytes −20 No edit summary undo
• curprev 04:2704:27, 4 June 2012 Academic PHD talk contribs 4,258 bytes −3 Undid revision 495880738 by Academic PHD (talk) Ulrich link is brohen so rmeoved. Not useful anyway undo
• curprev 04:2404:24, 4 June 2012 Academic PHD talk contribs m 4,261 bytes −190 Ulrich web link broken. It does not specify peer review but lists that and refereed. not useful. undo
• curprev 04:2204:22, 4 June 2012 Academic PHD talk contribs 4,451 bytes −50 Hi there b2 is not a peer-reviewed journal. It is paul bove and pals' private, closed journal. Subs do not go out to people in the field but straight to paul and the board, who solicit them in the first place Refereed sure, but not peer-reviewed. undo

31 May 2012

• curprev 11:3111:31, 31 May 2012 Redrose64 talk contribs 4,501 bytes −20 |day= is deprecated - use |date= if all three components are available undo

30 May 2012

• curprev 07:0707:07, 30 May 2012 Guillaume2303 talk contribs 4,521 bytes +93 revert: see talk page of SHF Wiki undo
• curprev 05:2205:22, 30 May 2012 SHF Wiki talk contribs 4,428 bytes +61 cleaning up first note from before; clarifying last line undo
• curprev 05:2005:20, 30 May 2012 SHF Wiki talk contribs m 4,367 bytes −226 clearing up note undo
• curprev 05:1905:19, 30 May 2012 SHF Wiki talk contribs 4,593 bytes +72 Undid revision 494443580 by Guillaume2303 (talk) This is NOT peer rvw but refereed. Last line defines the journal in its own words as "closed". Most ppl dont know what that means. undo

26 May 2012

• curprev 10:0510:05, 26 May 2012 Guillaume2303 talk contribs 4,521 bytes −72 revert introduction of formatting errors, duplicate text, etc per previous edit summary undo
• curprev 02:3702:37, 26 May 2012 SHF Wiki talk contribs 4,593 bytes +72 Undid revision 493643831 by Guillaume2303 (talk) No you are wrong it is better as refereed, b/c peers = experts in a specific field not pals on an in-house 'board.' last line key. undo

21 May 2012

• curprev 11:2311:23, 21 May 2012 Guillaume2303 talk contribs 4,521 bytes −72 revert restoration of formatting errors; change "refereed" to "reviewed" as explained before; remove last phrase: just a repeat of the statement that the journal only accepts commissioned submissions undo
• curprev 10:3810:38, 21 May 2012 SHF Wiki talk contribs 4,593 bytes +72 Hi I cant for some reason revert.Needs last line b/c it is a closed J. Also:" 'refereed' is more accurate (only board reviews, not experts in other fields) undo

20 May 2012

• curprev 15:4615:46, 20 May 2012 Meno25 talk contribs m 4,521 bytes +10 Update parameters using AWB (8062) undo

18 May 2012

• curprev 23:5523:55, 18 May 2012 Guillaume2303 talk contribs 4,511 bytes +5 I prefer "peer reviewer" over "referee", because the latter suggests that the reviewer somehow takes the decision. That's not true, it's always the EIC (not just this journal, speaking very generally here) undo
• curprev 23:5223:52, 18 May 2012 Guillaume2303 talk contribs 4,506 bytes +5 →References: layout tweak undo
• curprev 20:5420:54, 18 May 2012 Phoenixred talk contribs m 4,501 bytes +206 adding citation undo
• curprev 20:4220:42, 18 May 2012 Phoenixred talk contribs 4,295 bytes +80 Ulrich'sWeb, an index of serial publications, lists boundary 2 as a refereed publication. Therefore I'm listing it in the article. If this is a point of contention, please discuss it on the talk page. undo
• curprev 20:0220:02, 18 May 2012 Guillaume2303 talk contribs m 4,215 bytes −57 fix JSTOR link undo
• curprev 19:5919:59, 18 May 2012 Guillaume2303 talk contribs 4,272 bytes −147 tweaks, great job Phoenixred! undo
• curprev 19:4719:47, 18 May 2012 Phoenixred talk contribs m 4,419 bytes −125 cleaning up infobox undo
• curprev 19:4319:43, 18 May 2012 Phoenixred talk contribs m 4,544 bytes +52 adding low-res cover for the purpose of illustration and criticism. undo
• curprev 19:3919:39, 18 May 2012 Phoenixred talk contribs 4,492 bytes +104 adding full title as listed in worldcat and Ulrich's undo
• curprev 19:3419:34, 18 May 2012 Phoenixred talk contribs m 4,388 bytes +122 adding citation, moving quote to citation undo
• curprev 19:2819:28, 18 May 2012 Phoenixred talk contribs 4,266 bytes +2,447 Adding citations, infobox, and cleanup undo
• curprev 13:5713:57, 18 May 2012 Guillaume2303 talk contribs 1,819 bytes −48 reformulate undo

16 May 2012

• curprev 05:5205:52, 16 May 2012 SHF Wiki talk contribs 1,867 bytes +222 Undid revision 492815221 by Guillaume2303 (talk) Vandal. How do you know it is peer reviewed? Many J's are not. Do you know what in-house means? have you read b2? PhD? undo
• curprev 04:5304:53, 16 May 2012 Guillaume2303 talk contribs 1,645 bytes −222 Undid revision 492812436 by SHF Wiki (talk)revert per WP:SYNTH; please stop inserting your personal opinions and stick to the sources undo