Misplaced Pages

21 May 2013

• curprev 06:4706:47, 21 May 2013 Insilvis talk contribs 37,621 bytes −2 No edit summary undo
• curprev 06:4506:45, 21 May 2013 Insilvis talk contribs 37,623 bytes 0 →Independent Verification undo
• curprev 06:1506:15, 21 May 2013 Alanf777 talk contribs 37,623 bytes +168 →Independent Verification undo
• curprev 06:1106:11, 21 May 2013 Insilvis talk contribs 37,455 bytes −1 DAY-MONTH-YEAR, as in the rest of the text undo
• curprev 05:4705:47, 21 May 2013 VQuakr talk contribs 37,456 bytes −83 →Demonstrations: remove signature from article space undo
• curprev 05:0205:02, 21 May 2013 Alanf777 talk contribs 37,539 bytes +363 lead follow-on by Mark Forbes undo
• curprev 04:4804:48, 21 May 2013 Bhny talk contribs 37,176 bytes +639 Undid revision 556054604 by VQuakr (talk) not sure why I was reverted. reference is Forbes magazine, nothing to dispute undo
• curprev 04:4604:46, 21 May 2013 VQuakr talk contribs 36,537 bytes −639 Reverted to revision 556051918 by TenOfAllTrades: rv - get consensus, then edit the article. also, signature in article space. (TW) undo
• curprev 04:4504:45, 21 May 2013 Bhny talk contribs 37,176 bytes −557 →Independent Verification: edited down so it's not all quotes undo
• curprev 04:3804:38, 21 May 2013 Alanf777 talk contribs 37,733 bytes +1 →Demonstrations undo
• curprev 04:3704:37, 21 May 2013 Alanf777 talk contribs 37,732 bytes −206 →Independent Verification undo
• curprev 04:2304:23, 21 May 2013 Alanf777 talk contribs 37,938 bytes 0 →Independent Verification undo
• curprev 04:1504:15, 21 May 2013 Alanf777 talk contribs 37,938 bytes +1,401 →Demonstrations: independent verification undo
• curprev 04:1404:14, 21 May 2013 TenOfAllTrades talk contribs 36,537 bytes −576 Undid revision 556051383 by Stormcrow76 (talk) The problem is one of WP:WEIGHT. There's no disagreement that the self-published document exists; it's whether or not it deserves mention. undo
• curprev 04:0704:07, 21 May 2013 Stormcrow76 talk contribs 37,113 bytes +576 Undid revision 556050395 by Mangoe (talk) Reliability is not an issue... the paper WAS published, and claims were made.. those are the facts undo
• curprev 03:5603:56, 21 May 2013 Mangoe talk contribs 36,537 bytes −576 Undid revision 556049485 by 72.200.67.108 (talk) still not reliable undo
• curprev 03:4603:46, 21 May 2013 72.200.67.108 talk 37,113 bytes +576 Undid revision 556048538 by McSly (talk) It's at least as reliable as the 'amazing' Randi, and more so than the opinions of Bardi. It reflects opinions of scientists, and their opinions are noteworthy. undo
• curprev 03:3803:38, 21 May 2013 McSly talk contribs 36,537 bytes −576 Undid revision 556048251 by 72.200.67.108 (talk) source is not RS undo
• curprev 03:3403:34, 21 May 2013 72.200.67.108 talk 37,113 bytes +576 Undid revision 556046962 by Mangoe (talk) It isn't about the report, it's about the opinion of well qualified scientists in their own right. undo
• curprev 03:2203:22, 21 May 2013 Mangoe talk contribs 36,537 bytes −576 Undid revision 556045735 by 75.18.228.4 (talk) no, it's still a junk source undo
• curprev 03:1003:10, 21 May 2013 75.18.228.4 talk 37,113 bytes +576 Updated Independent Validation conducted on May 20, 2013 undo
• curprev 03:0103:01, 21 May 2013 68.145.170.74 talk 36,537 bytes −2 →Reactions to the claims undo
• curprev 01:1801:18, 21 May 2013 VQuakr talk contribs 36,539 bytes −621 Reverted to revision 556015607 by Bhny: please leave off of article until consensus emerges on talk page that this is a reliable source. (TW) undo
• curprev 00:0900:09, 21 May 2013 Arthur Rubin talk contribs 37,160 bytes −1,403 Undid revision 556024924 by 72.200.67.108 (talk) no sources undo

20 May 2013

• curprev 23:5323:53, 20 May 2013 72.200.67.108 talk 38,563 bytes +1,403 Undid revision 556015607 by Bhny (talk) undo
• curprev 23:4323:43, 20 May 2013 Alanf777 talk contribs 37,160 bytes +29 →Demonstrations: different quote undo
• curprev 23:4123:41, 20 May 2013 Alanf777 talk contribs 37,131 bytes +592 →Demonstrations undo
• curprev 22:3022:30, 20 May 2013 Bhny talk contribs 36,539 bytes −581 Undid revision 556014567 by Ellulpatrick (talk) WP:WPNOTRS Misplaced Pages articles should be based mainly on reliable secondary sources. undo
• curprev 22:2022:20, 20 May 2013 Ellulpatrick talk contribs m 37,120 bytes +581 Undid revision 555936006 by AndyTheGrump (talk) undo
• curprev 19:2119:21, 20 May 2013 TenOfAllTrades talk contribs 36,539 bytes −386 Woefully unreliable sources, per article talk. undo
• curprev 18:4118:41, 20 May 2013 Alanf777 talk contribs 36,925 bytes +171 →Demonstrations: link undo
• curprev 17:3217:32, 20 May 2013 Brian Josephson talk contribs 36,754 bytes +215 report of new investigation undo
• curprev 15:5815:58, 20 May 2013 AndyTheGrump talk contribs 36,539 bytes −581 Undid revision 555962145 by 155.245.21.197 (talk) please discuss this on the talk page - submission of a non-peer-reviewed paper isn't significant undo
• curprev 15:5515:55, 20 May 2013 155.245.21.197 talk 37,120 bytes +581 Reinserted text on paper entitled "Indication of anomalous heat energy production in a reactor device" undo
• curprev 12:1412:14, 20 May 2013 AndyTheGrump talk contribs 36,539 bytes −581 Undid revision 555900757 by Ellulpatrick (talk) no peer-reviewed preprints aren't WP:RS undo
• curprev 06:3006:30, 20 May 2013 83.248.102.136 talk 37,120 bytes +8 →Reactions to the claims undo
• curprev 05:1805:18, 20 May 2013 Ellulpatrick talk contribs 37,112 bytes +581 Added reference to May 2013 Independent 3rd Party Test Report Paper undo

1 April 2013

• curprev 17:5817:58, 1 April 2013 TheNextFuture talk contribs m 36,531 bytes −84 No edit summary undo

26 March 2013

• curprev 10:4210:42, 26 March 2013 NUMB3RN7NE talk contribs 36,615 bytes −12 ??? The Italian one is an issued patent, not a patent application (Status: rilasciata = ISSUED) http://www.uibm.gov.it/uibm/dati/Avanzata.aspx?load=info_list_uno&id=1610895&table=Invention&#ancoraSearch%20Patent%20Issued%20by%20Italian%20Patent%20Office undo

7 March 2013

• curprev 19:1619:16, 7 March 2013 Yobot talk contribs m 36,627 bytes 0 →Commercial plans: WP:CHECKWIKI errors fixed + general fixes using AWB (8961) undo

26 February 2013

• curprev 01:3001:30, 26 February 2013 Addbot talk contribs m 36,627 bytes −286 Bot: Migrating 8 interwiki links, now provided by Wikidata on d:q2362043 (Report Errors) undo

20 February 2013

• curprev 02:5302:53, 20 February 2013 Bhny talk contribs 36,913 bytes −21 Undid revision 539151733 by Knight of Infinity (talk) best not to link inside a quote. also exothermal doesn't necessarily mean nuclear (god knows exactly what they meant) undo
• curprev 01:5301:53, 20 February 2013 Knight of Infinity talk contribs 36,934 bytes +21 inserted w-link undo
• curprev 00:5700:57, 20 February 2013 Knight of Infinity talk contribs 36,913 bytes +62 →Commercial plans: Inserted e-link. undo

18 February 2013

• curprev 23:2923:29, 18 February 2013 Bhny talk contribs m 36,851 bytes 0 No edit summary undo
• curprev 13:5113:51, 18 February 2013 Klemen Kocjancic talk contribs m 36,851 bytes −3 →Patents: clean up using AWB undo

17 February 2013

• curprev 20:2620:26, 17 February 2013 Marcika talk contribs 36,854 bytes +12 patent _application_ undo

24 January 2013

• curprev 23:4423:44, 24 January 2013 Skamecrazy123 talk contribs m 36,842 bytes −43 Reverted edits by 134.117.64.140 (talk) to last revision by Skamecrazy123 (HG) undo
• curprev 23:4423:44, 24 January 2013 134.117.64.140 talk 36,885 bytes +43 No edit summary undo
• curprev 23:4223:42, 24 January 2013 Skamecrazy123 talk contribs m 36,842 bytes −98 Reverted edits by 134.117.64.140 (talk) to last revision by ClueBot NG (HG) undo