Misplaced Pages

25 December 2013

• curprev 18:4018:40, 25 December 2013 Josh3580 talk contribs m 12,906 bytes −64 Copyright infringement on image, also - unsourced external links. Please clarify link addition by citing a source... Where exactly are these links listed as "official?" The twitter page is not a "verified" account. (HG) undo
• curprev 18:3118:31, 25 December 2013 Carpefemme talk contribs 12,970 bytes +64 the links are listed as official. And regularly sourced online to boot. also. you removed images again. bad editing. undo
• curprev 18:2818:28, 25 December 2013 Thomas.W talk contribs 12,906 bytes −64 Undid revision 587651322 by Carpefemme (talk) They're valid only if confirmed as genuine, which these, AFAIK, are not. undo
• curprev 18:2518:25, 25 December 2013 Carpefemme talk contribs 12,970 bytes +64 Undid revision 587650445 by Thomas.W (talk) you removed images and links. the links are akin to all other bio pages for living people also. relevant to wiki and valid content undo
• curprev 18:1518:15, 25 December 2013 Thomas.W talk contribs 12,906 bytes −64 Reverted 1 edit by Carpefemme (talk): Rv addition of inappropriate external links. Misplaced Pages is an encyclopaedia, not a social web site. (TW) undo
• curprev 17:5417:54, 25 December 2013 Carpefemme talk contribs 12,970 bytes +64 please stop removing images. investigate then delete dont do it the other way round. 3RR rule and I shall report for this violation again. undo
• curprev 17:4617:46, 25 December 2013 Lady Lotus talk contribs 12,906 bytes −78 →External links: do NOT add external links such as twitter or facebook unless they are verified which these are not undo
• curprev 17:4517:45, 25 December 2013 Lady Lotus talk contribs 12,984 bytes +14 hiding images until commons has a chance to look into ownership. do not revert per 3RR undo
• curprev 17:1017:10, 25 December 2013 Carpefemme talk contribs 12,970 bytes +239 Undid revision 587642381 by Lady Lotus i sent them to that fan page following taking them. i own them and have released to commons. there is no dispute as to ownership, please leave alone. undo
• curprev 16:4316:43, 25 December 2013 Lady Lotus talk contribs 12,731 bytes −239 Reverted to revision 587634652 by Lady Lotus (talk): Both images you "claim" as your own are both on Elizarova's facebook page. . (TW) undo
• curprev 15:3115:31, 25 December 2013 Carpefemme talk contribs 12,970 bytes +239 Undid revision 587634652 by Lady Lotus (talk) the images are owned by me. undo
• curprev 15:0915:09, 25 December 2013 Lady Lotus talk contribs 12,731 bytes −239 Reverted to revision 587381578 by Lady Lotus (talk): Images have been removed from commons. (TW) undo
• curprev 13:5613:56, 25 December 2013 Carpefemme talk contribs 12,970 bytes −8 Reinserting malicious removal of commons image undo
• curprev 13:2913:29, 25 December 2013 Carpefemme talk contribs 12,978 bytes −10 →2010–present: returning falsely removed image by FairySpit undo
• curprev 13:2013:20, 25 December 2013 Carpefemme talk contribs 12,988 bytes +78 No edit summary undo
• curprev 13:1913:19, 25 December 2013 Carpefemme talk contribs 12,910 bytes +179 Undid revision 587381578 by Lady Lotus (talk) I own the images and added them. They are legit. You have been banned for edited before. undo

23 December 2013

• curprev 15:1415:14, 23 December 2013 Lady Lotus talk contribs 12,731 bytes −179 both images are false claim to ownership and will be removed from commons undo
• curprev 15:1015:10, 23 December 2013 Lady Lotus talk contribs 12,910 bytes −78 →External links: links MUST be verified undo
• curprev 09:0209:02, 23 December 2013 217.43.178.142 talk 12,988 bytes +188 references and credits as per sources. please read sources. undo
• curprev 00:3700:37, 23 December 2013 Lady Lotus talk contribs 12,800 bytes −159 Reverted to revision 586897184 by Fairyspit (talk): None of the links are verified; nor is she credited as an actress in that source. (TW) undo
• curprev 00:2200:22, 23 December 2013 Bbb23 talk contribs 12,959 bytes −60 →External links: one social media site is enough undo

22 December 2013

• curprev 22:5022:50, 22 December 2013 217.43.178.142 talk 13,019 bytes +20 →Acting: adding London to theatre ref undo
• curprev 22:1322:13, 22 December 2013 217.43.178.142 talk 12,999 bytes +90 credited ref return undo
• curprev 22:1222:12, 22 December 2013 217.43.178.142 talk 12,909 bytes +109 addinh links undo

20 December 2013

• curprev 04:1504:15, 20 December 2013 Fairyspit talk contribs 12,800 bytes +3 formating: two consecutive images on the right as previously is a no-no in layout and ruins the whole format of the article. photo also too large. photo placed on the left, section but section still started with text. undo

18 December 2013

• curprev 17:3017:30, 18 December 2013 Lowercase sigmabot talk contribs m 12,797 bytes −25 Removing protection templates) (bot undo
• curprev 17:0917:09, 18 December 2013 Lady Lotus talk contribs 12,822 bytes −90 no serious credit as an actress undo
• curprev 17:0717:07, 18 December 2013 Lady Lotus talk contribs 12,912 bytes −109 →External links: none are verified undo
• curprev 17:0417:04, 18 December 2013 Lady Lotus talk contribs m 13,021 bytes +11 No edit summary undo
• curprev 17:0217:02, 18 December 2013 Lady Lotus talk contribs 13,010 bytes −18 No edit summary undo
• curprev 16:5016:50, 18 December 2013 Lady Lotus talk contribs 13,028 bytes −79 →2010–present: simplified thumb template; used cropped picture undo

12 December 2013

• curprev 02:5502:55, 12 December 2013 Bbb23 talk contribs m 13,107 bytes −201 Reverted edits by Carpefemme (talk) to last version by Fairyspit undo
• curprev 02:5302:53, 12 December 2013 Carpefemme talk contribs 13,308 bytes +201 Undid revision 585686949 by Fairyspit (talk) Not sure as to why this excerpt should be removed. Please explain - you visited only 5 mins ago also. undo
• curprev 02:4902:49, 12 December 2013 Fairyspit talk contribs 13,107 bytes −201 No edit summary undo
• curprev 02:4802:48, 12 December 2013 Carpefemme talk contribs m 13,308 bytes +201 Undid revision 585686342 by Bbb23 (talk) Page creator - Bbb23 - revisions you removed are objective. It is biased and subjective to allow removal. See history of dispute and sock puppetry. undo
• curprev 02:4802:48, 12 December 2013 FreeRangeFrog talk contribs 13,107 bytes +26 Adding {{pp-semi-blp}} (TW) undo
• curprev 02:4302:43, 12 December 2013 Bbb23 talk contribs 13,081 bytes −201 Undid revision 585686259 by 86.133.52.20 (talk) BLP violation undo
• curprev 02:4302:43, 12 December 2013 Bbb23 talk contribs m 13,282 bytes 0 Protected Katia Elizarova: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy ( (expires 02:43, 15 December 2013 (UTC)) (expires 02:43, 15 December 2013 (UTC))) undo
• curprev 02:4302:43, 12 December 2013 86.133.52.20 talk 13,282 bytes +201 Correction - as per some revisionist BC fan in denial. Sorry Fairyspit - he probably loves her undo
• curprev 02:4002:40, 12 December 2013 Fairyspit talk contribs 13,081 bytes −199 Undid revision 585685759 by 86.133.52.20 (talk) undo
• curprev 02:3802:38, 12 December 2013 86.133.52.20 talk 13,280 bytes +199 Undid revision 585685679 by Fairyspit (talk) Loser - fairyspit undo
• curprev 02:3702:37, 12 December 2013 Fairyspit talk contribs 13,081 bytes −199 Undid revision 585685594 by 86.133.52.20 (talk) undo
• curprev 02:3602:36, 12 December 2013 86.133.52.20 talk 13,280 bytes +199 Undid revision 585685386 by Fairyspit (talk) STOP it malicious edit - Fairyspit undo
• curprev 02:3402:34, 12 December 2013 Fairyspit talk contribs 13,081 bytes −199 Undid revision 585685350 by 86.133.52.20 (talk) undo
• curprev 02:3402:34, 12 December 2013 86.133.52.20 talk 13,280 bytes +199 Undoing Malicious history reversioning my Fairyspit undo
• curprev 02:3302:33, 12 December 2013 Fairyspit talk contribs 13,081 bytes −9 No edit summary undo
• curprev 02:3202:32, 12 December 2013 Fairyspit talk contribs 13,090 bytes −192 No edit summary undo
• curprev 02:3102:31, 12 December 2013 86.133.52.20 talk 13,282 bytes −9 →Personal life: logic corrections undo
• curprev 02:3002:30, 12 December 2013 86.133.52.20 talk 13,291 bytes +105 Undid revision 585684494 by 030891posts (talk) I believe that indeed it was national news- yes. amended accordingly. Thanks for the prompt. undo
• curprev 02:2502:25, 12 December 2013 030891posts talk contribs 13,186 bytes −91 widely reported is this national news? it's at best gossip. it was speculated never reported they're in a relationship. she still lives with the boyfriend if following ur reasoning look out for her instagram. undo