Misplaced Pages

9 July 2014

• curprev 17:0817:08, 9 July 2014 Will102 talk contribs 121,605 bytes +33 No edit summary
• curprev 16:3616:36, 9 July 2014 Serendipodous talk contribs 121,572 bytes −23 I'm sorry Kev we can't do that without redefining the Kuiper belt. Our definition only goes up to 48 AU.
• curprev 16:2916:29, 9 July 2014 Kheider talk contribs 121,595 bytes −10 within 50AU of the Sun (Game over)
• curprev 16:1116:11, 9 July 2014 Will102 talk contribs 121,605 bytes +33 Undid revision 616241249 by Serendipodous (talk)
• curprev 16:0516:05, 9 July 2014 Serendipodous talk contribs m 121,572 bytes −33 Reverted edits by Will102 (talk) to last version by Kheider
• curprev 15:3415:34, 9 July 2014 Will102 talk contribs 121,605 bytes +33 Undid revision 616233789 by Kheider (talk)
• curprev 15:1015:10, 9 July 2014 Kheider talk contribs m 121,572 bytes −33 rv. Will, you have never replied to any of my talk page comments. There is no reason to suspect anything larger than Pluto is within ~60AU of the Sun.
• curprev 14:2714:27, 9 July 2014 Will102 talk contribs 121,605 bytes +33 Undid revision 616155912 by Serendipodous (talk) You still have no proof, and you refused to engage in a reasonable dialog on the subject

8 July 2014

• curprev 23:4223:42, 8 July 2014 Serendipodous talk contribs 121,572 bytes −33 Undid revision 616142976 by Will102 (talk) We have established consensus on the talk page. At this point your behaviour is nothing but disruptive.
• curprev 21:4121:41, 8 July 2014 Will102 talk contribs 121,605 bytes +33 Undid revision 615954218 by Sailsbystars (talk) Still no evidence of the absolute.

7 July 2014

• curprev 14:3514:35, 7 July 2014 Sailsbystars talk contribs 121,572 bytes −33 rm tag per talk page discussion

5 July 2014

• curprev 21:0821:08, 5 July 2014 Will102 talk contribs 121,605 bytes +33 Undid revision 615740586 by Serendipodous (talk)
• curprev 20:4320:43, 5 July 2014 Serendipodous talk contribs 121,572 bytes −33 Undid revision 615736836 by Will102 (talk) What you're asking for is extremely difficult to locate, because it depends on the definition of "Kuiper belt" used. Please, come to the talk page
• curprev 20:0820:08, 5 July 2014 Will102 talk contribs 121,605 bytes +33 This has been discussed. A lot. After all of these months, you have done everything except show proof for that statement.
• curprev 19:0419:04, 5 July 2014 Serendipodous talk contribs 121,572 bytes −1 ..head. Let's take this to the next level. Why not?
• curprev 19:0219:02, 5 July 2014 Serendipodous talk contribs 121,573 bytes −33 Undid revision 615728484 by Will102 (talk) Go a
• curprev 18:5018:50, 5 July 2014 Will102 talk contribs 121,606 bytes +33 The roundabout means that Serendipodous used to remove the need for the citation this time was clever, but I'm still discussing having this labeled as vandalism.

4 July 2014

• curprev 19:2519:25, 4 July 2014 J 1982 talk contribs m 121,573 bytes −28 already at Commons
• curprev 19:2419:24, 4 July 2014 J 1982 talk contribs m 121,601 bytes +28 →External links
• curprev 02:0502:05, 4 July 2014 Quenhitran talk contribs 121,573 bytes +15 No edit summary

1 July 2014

• curprev 08:0208:02, 1 July 2014 FeRDNYC talk contribs 121,558 bytes −51 Undid revision 614739496 by Nickst (talk) Ceres is IN the asteroid belt, therefore both an asteroid and a dwarf planet. Not so Pluto.

28 June 2014

• curprev 09:3809:38, 28 June 2014 Nickst talk contribs 121,609 bytes +51 Undid revision 614739313 by Jusdafax (talk) - but listed in List of asteroids visited by spacecraft. also listed Ceres, which also dwarf planet. change list or keep both
• curprev 09:3509:35, 28 June 2014 Jusdafax talk contribs 121,558 bytes −51 Undid revision 614738506 by Nickst (talk) Revert on the important grounds that Pluto is not an asteroid, it is currently described as a Dwarf planet
• curprev 09:2109:21, 28 June 2014 Nickst talk contribs 121,609 bytes +51 added Category:Asteroids to be visited by spacecraft using HotCat

24 June 2014

• curprev 20:2620:26, 24 June 2014 TJRC talk contribs m 121,558 bytes −4 →Name
• curprev 20:0220:02, 24 June 2014 Serendipodous talk contribs 121,562 bytes 0 →Name
• curprev 20:0120:01, 24 June 2014 Serendipodous talk contribs 121,562 bytes +21 →Name: I have noi idea why that was done; the sentence was about Hinduism
• curprev 19:5619:56, 24 June 2014 Serendipodous talk contribs 121,541 bytes +217 No edit summary
• curprev 10:3810:38, 24 June 2014 Serendipodous talk contribs 121,324 bytes −22 rm unsourced figure

19 June 2014

• curprev 10:2510:25, 19 June 2014 Serendipodous talk contribs 121,346 bytes −278 This is not true; again, size and mass are different things, and this is dealt with elsewhere in the article. Also, the current evidence suggests that either Pluto is smaller or Pluto and Eris are roughly the same size.
• curprev 10:2010:20, 19 June 2014 Serendipodous talk contribs 121,624 bytes −8 The only object larger than Pluto in the trans-Neptunian population is Eris, and Eris is not in the Kuiper belt as Misplaced Pages defines it. So either Pluto is the largest object in the Kuiper belt or the largest known object.

18 June 2014

• curprev 19:1619:16, 18 June 2014 JDDJS talk contribs m 121,632 bytes 0 No edit summary
• curprev 19:1419:14, 18 June 2014 JDDJS talk contribs 121,632 bytes +278 added recent discoveries have indicated that Pluto is larger than Eris (included sources)

17 June 2014

• curprev 06:4206:42, 17 June 2014 493Titanollante talk contribs m 121,354 bytes −25 one of the

12 June 2014

• curprev 03:1503:15, 12 June 2014 Rothorpe talk contribs 121,379 bytes −38 rv good faith edits, see Talk
• curprev 02:4802:48, 12 June 2014 RichardAlexanderHall talk contribs m 121,417 bytes +11 No edit summary
• curprev 02:4202:42, 12 June 2014 RichardAlexanderHall talk contribs 121,406 bytes +27 Change scope of regional reference to larger area to avoid confusion: Kuiper-belt -> trans-nuptunian.

10 June 2014

• curprev 05:1105:11, 10 June 2014 Quondum talk contribs 121,379 bytes +14 →Near resonances: minor numeric formatting changes

4 June 2014

• curprev 13:1313:13, 4 June 2014 Rjwilmsi talk contribs m 121,365 bytes +24 →References: Added 1 doi to a journal cite using AWB (10216)

30 May 2014

• curprev 17:1017:10, 30 May 2014 Will102 talk contribs 121,341 bytes +33 Undid revision 610765364 by Serendipodous (talk) That's nice. Come up with a good source, and I won't report this.
• curprev 09:1809:18, 30 May 2014 Serendipodous talk contribs 121,308 bytes −33 Misplaced Pages's definition of the Kuiper belt is more restrictive than some. At this point the region we call the Kuiper belt has been pretty conclusively farmed of large objects.
• curprev 02:4902:49, 30 May 2014 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 121,341 bytes +14 Dating maintenance tags: {{Citation needed}}
• curprev 02:2802:28, 30 May 2014 Will102 talk contribs 121,327 bytes +19 added citation needed for claim that Pluto is the largest object in an area that has not been fully explored.

24 May 2014

• curprev 13:4613:46, 24 May 2014 Rothorpe talk contribs m 121,308 bytes −1 →Orbit and rotation
• curprev 13:4413:44, 24 May 2014 Rothorpe talk contribs m 121,309 bytes +2 →Orbit and rotation

13 May 2014

• curprev 10:3710:37, 13 May 2014 FeRDNYC talk contribs m 121,307 bytes +19 "A few astronomer" courts weasel-wording (it'll end up with a flag, guaranteed). Unless we have a source providing headcount on opposition, best to remain neutral.

4 May 2014

• curprev 20:4920:49, 4 May 2014 Kwamikagami talk contribs 121,288 bytes +2 specifically astronomers, but clear minority
• curprev 20:2720:27, 4 May 2014 Kwamikagami talk contribs 121,286 bytes +279 →top
• curprev 20:1320:13, 4 May 2014 Kwamikagami talk contribs 121,007 bytes +13 →top
• curprev 20:1120:11, 4 May 2014 Kwamikagami talk contribs 120,994 bytes +46 →top