Misplaced Pages

2 October 2018

• curprev 14:2114:21, 2 October 2018 Ozzie10aaaa talk contribs 10,167 bytes −165 →See also: ?? undo
• curprev 14:2014:20, 2 October 2018 Ozzie10aaaa talk contribs 10,332 bytes −27 No edit summary undo
• curprev 14:2014:20, 2 October 2018 Ozzie10aaaa talk contribs 10,359 bytes −17 No edit summary undo
• curprev 14:1914:19, 2 October 2018 Ozzie10aaaa talk contribs 10,376 bytes +404 No edit summary undo

11 May 2018

• curprev 11:1011:10, 11 May 2018 Auric talk contribs 9,972 bytes 0 →Criticism undo

8 May 2018

• curprev 17:0217:02, 8 May 2018 Yngvadottir talk contribs m 9,972 bytes +160 Filled out WHO cite undo
• curprev 16:5216:52, 8 May 2018 Yngvadottir talk contribs 9,812 bytes −2 stray [. Fast fix to WHO ref; needs expansion, bare link. Moved that sentence to top of Criticism section. undo
• curprev 16:3516:35, 8 May 2018 Yngvadottir talk contribs 9,814 bytes −21 Tweaks mainly to punctuation, somewhat condensed positive study results. Added to lede that there have been positive study results but that ACOG published advisory regarding possible negative outcomes. undo
• curprev 16:2516:25, 8 May 2018 Yngvadottir talk contribs 9,835 bytes +777 Reinserting passages removed by Jessicapin with earlier edits, including a stated aim and a summary of a survey result. undo
• curprev 16:1716:17, 8 May 2018 Yngvadottir talk contribs 9,058 bytes −806 Undid revision 840161883 by Jessicapin (talk): Editorializing: unsupported negative with only publisher's page for a textbook cited. Requires reliable source stating the point. undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 03:4203:42, 8 May 2018 Jessicapin talk contribs 9,864 bytes +806 No edit summary undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 03:3303:33, 8 May 2018 Jessicapin talk contribs 9,058 bytes −652 →Results: harmful. 71 percent alleged improvement is a misrepresentation of what was actually asked undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 02:5002:50, 8 May 2018 Jessicapin talk contribs 9,710 bytes +546 risks rarely discussed but this happened to me, experts say common, clearly possible based on anatomy. I can provide expert testimony from physicians websites if I need to. otherwise, I was going to publish a case study of myself with a doctor. but I don't think this should be necessary. it is important people know this can happen. undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 02:4302:43, 8 May 2018 Jessicapin talk contribs 9,164 bytes −70 exposure of the glans is not a desired goal as chronic exposure can actually lead to desensitization. these are primarily done for cosmetic reasons. undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 02:4202:42, 8 May 2018 Jessicapin talk contribs 9,234 bytes −54 saying this improves sexual function is misleading, especially given multiple reports of clitoral denervations during these procedures. many patients end up with their clitoral glans completely numb. reported improvements in function are merely a placebo effect. for those who think increased exposure means increased function, this is not supported. undo Tag: Visual edit

27 March 2018

• curprev 05:2305:23, 27 March 2018 Shenme talk contribs m 9,288 bytes +2 "amplication" -> "amplification" (correct in cited article) undo

15 February 2018

• curprev 22:0422:04, 15 February 2018 Flyer22 Frozen talk contribs 9,286 bytes +33 No edit summary undo

14 February 2018

• curprev 22:0522:05, 14 February 2018 213.87.159.216 talk 9,253 bytes +173 No edit summary undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 07:4207:42, 14 February 2018 Bus Bax talk contribs 9,080 bytes +252 No edit summary undo

11 February 2018

• curprev 17:5117:51, 11 February 2018 Flyer22 Frozen talk contribs 8,828 bytes −276 Undid revision 825056061 by 123.231.106.221 (talk) Spam. undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 06:2106:21, 11 February 2018 123.231.106.221 talk 9,104 bytes +276 →Criticism: in connection with FGM undo

7 November 2017

• curprev 00:3500:35, 7 November 2017 Flyer22 Frozen talk contribs 8,828 bytes +25 →Criticism: Labia pride is "see also." Not "main." undo
• curprev 00:3500:35, 7 November 2017 Flyer22 Frozen talk contribs 8,803 bytes −310 Revert. Side-by-side change shows no noticeable difference and caption focuses on piercing. Not a good enough lead visual to show reduction. And images should generally be on the right. undo

6 November 2017

• curprev 10:2410:24, 6 November 2017 Bus Bax talk contribs 9,113 bytes 0 No edit summary undo
• curprev 10:2210:22, 6 November 2017 Bus Bax talk contribs 9,113 bytes +29 →Criticism undo
• curprev 10:2110:21, 6 November 2017 Bus Bax talk contribs 9,084 bytes +281 No edit summary undo

10 October 2017

• curprev 19:4019:40, 10 October 2017 Flyer22 Frozen talk contribs 8,803 bytes −292 Unnecessary additional images. Caused WP:SANDWICHING. undo
• curprev 08:0608:06, 10 October 2017 Lamilli talk contribs 9,095 bytes +292 No edit summary undo

7 October 2017

• curprev 19:3819:38, 7 October 2017 Flyer22 Frozen talk contribs 8,803 bytes −55 Undid revision 804204410 by 119.154.163.219 (talk) No, it's not. See WP:Minor. What you added is WP:SPAM. undo
• curprev 13:2313:23, 7 October 2017 119.154.163.219 talk 8,858 bytes +55 this is a minor edit undo Tag: Visual edit

4 September 2017

• curprev 07:0607:06, 4 September 2017 96.54.168.57 talk 8,803 bytes +4 No edit summary undo

11 July 2017

• curprev 00:5500:55, 11 July 2017 Flyer22 Frozen talk contribs m 8,799 bytes −1 Reverted edits by 2001:579:8104:B:5CF3:C5F5:A08C:2AE8 (talk) to last version by Magic links bot undo

10 July 2017

• curprev 22:2222:22, 10 July 2017 2001:579:8104:b:5cf3:c5f5:a08c:2ae8 talk 8,800 bytes +1 →Results undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

22 May 2017

• curprev 15:0815:08, 22 May 2017 Magic links bot talk contribs m 8,799 bytes +8 Replace magic links with templates per local RfC and MediaWiki RfC undo

5 March 2017

• curprev 00:1500:15, 5 March 2017 PrimeBOT talk contribs m 8,791 bytes −22 →References: rmv template being deleted - TFD - BRFA undo

6 June 2016

• curprev 16:0316:03, 6 June 2016 GreenC bot talk contribs 8,813 bytes +3 WaybackMedic undo

7 March 2016

• curprev 14:2914:29, 7 March 2016 Hazard-Bot talk contribs m 8,810 bytes +22 Bot: Adding {{Research help|Med}}; please leave feedback/comments at Misplaced Pages talk:Research help #ResHelp undo

5 March 2016

• curprev 11:4111:41, 5 March 2016 Barbara (WVS) talk contribs 8,788 bytes +4 →Results: wl undo

4 March 2016

• curprev 03:3703:37, 4 March 2016 Ranze talk contribs 8,784 bytes +91 adding note about original location, the PDF of pages 101-104 even retains the expert-reviews URL in it undo
• curprev 03:2503:25, 4 March 2016 Ranze talk contribs 8,693 bytes +517 restoring reference removed in special:diff/707681820 with an updated URL, unfortunately I can't archive it due to robots.txt undo
• curprev 03:1903:19, 4 March 2016 Ranze talk contribs 8,176 bytes +183 →See also: restoring circumcision link, with a bit of an explanation on how it relates, to address Callinus' objection so it will stop being removed undo

2 March 2016

• curprev 03:3803:38, 2 March 2016 Cyberbot II talk contribs 7,993 bytes +131 Rescuing 1 sources. #IABot undo
• curprev 03:3403:34, 2 March 2016 Flyer22 Frozen talk contribs m 7,862 bytes −1 WP:Dummy edit for edit history: Callinus made an argument at WP:Med; it's linked to at Talk:Clitoral hood reduction#Circumcision See also link. undo
• curprev 03:2503:25, 2 March 2016 Callinus talk contribs 7,863 bytes +23 →See also: see Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Medicine. Changing circumcision to "Genital modification and mutilation" as an umbrella article that has various surgical practices, along with short WP:NPOV coverage of pro and anti arguments undo
• curprev 00:5100:51, 2 March 2016 Flyer22 Frozen talk contribs 7,840 bytes −1 WP:Dummy edit: It's not that ''The Journal of Sexual Medicine'' is not WP:MEDRS-compliant; it's that review articles/other secondary sources are preferred to primary sources. Peer review is not the same thing as literature review. undo
• curprev 00:3400:34, 2 March 2016 Callinus talk contribs 7,841 bytes −576 →Criticism: if the journal of sexual medicine is not MEDRS then the section should not be used - this section was previously used to POV push the phrase "women's rights" - the (bad) paper is on various surgeon's websites undo

1 March 2016

• curprev 11:1511:15, 1 March 2016 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 8,417 bytes +32 Dating maintenance tags: {{Dead link}} {{Cn}} undo
• curprev 10:5510:55, 1 March 2016 Barbara (WVS) talk contribs 8,385 bytes −99 →External resources: removed external link which contains no information on the topic undo
• curprev 10:5210:52, 1 March 2016 Barbara (WVS) talk contribs 8,484 bytes −6 →Criticism: ce undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 10:5110:51, 1 March 2016 Barbara (WVS) talk contribs 8,490 bytes −698 →Criticism: rmvd non MEDRS citation undo