Misplaced Pages

Criticism of socialism: Revision history

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
View logs for this page (view filter log)
Filter revisionsshowhide
External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

13 December 2021

16 November 2021

8 November 2021

4 November 2021

20 October 2021

12 October 2021

6 October 2021

28 August 2021

16 August 2021

15 August 2021

30 July 2021

23 May 2021

20 April 2021

30 March 2021

21 March 2021

19 March 2021

10 March 2021

24 February 2021

21 February 2021

  • curprev 04:2404:24, 21 February 2021 Thanksforhelping talk contribs 36,132 bytes −38 removed Black Book of Communism—the relevance of a book criticizing nation-states calling themselves “communist” (and not of actual communism, which itself ≠ socialism) to an article on socialism is very unclear undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit

20 February 2021

19 February 2021

18 February 2021

17 February 2021

  • curprev 03:5903:59, 17 February 2021 Thanksforhelping talk contribs 38,020 bytes −519 removed uncited paragraph that has been sitting here for a while, and had had a CN tag on it for 6 months. If we think this reference is valuable, we need a cite (who are these people who supposedly make this claim?) undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit

13 February 2021

12 February 2021

9 February 2021

  • curprev 10:5010:50, 9 February 2021 Coolcaesar talk contribs 40,560 bytes +1,068 Undid revision 1005697141 by Thanksforhelping (talk) Revert inappropriate deletion that violates WP:NOT. Misplaced Pages is not censored. Go read the cited source on Google Books. It's linked. undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 03:1403:14, 9 February 2021 Thanksforhelping talk contribs 39,492 bytes −598 removed Hayek’s criticism of academics (purportedly) being biased towards socialism, as this is a criticism of academics and not of socialism undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
  • curprev 00:2500:25, 9 February 2021 Thanksforhelping talk contribs 40,090 bytes −1,068 Reduced incentives: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" is Marx's slogan describing a communist society, not a socialist one ("From each according to his ability, to each according to his contribution" is Marx's slogan for socialism). It's unclear whether Galbraith has confused socialism with communism (he does mention "socialists," but not exclusively) or whether this is merely a criticism of communism. Either way, it doesn't seem to be apt or accurate. undo Tag: Reverted

30 January 2021

29 January 2021

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)