Misplaced Pages

17 May 2022

• curprev 18:0618:06, 17 May 2022 Dronebogus talk contribs m 140,261 bytes −142 Reverted 1 edit by 71.117.29.63 (talk) to last revision by Dronebogus undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
• curprev 14:4714:47, 17 May 2022 71.117.29.63 talk 140,403 bytes +142 Undid revision 1088201604 by Dronebogus (talk). This is framing conservative points from the lens of progressive talking points. As an example, you would not frame heliocentrism around geocentrism. The appropriate language would be heliocentrism is x and geocentrism is y. undo Tags: Undo Reverted

16 May 2022

• curprev 18:2618:26, 16 May 2022 Dronebogus talk contribs 140,261 bytes −142 Reverted 7 edits by 71.117.29.63 (talk) undo Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted

15 May 2022

• curprev 23:3123:31, 15 May 2022 71.117.29.63 talk 140,403 bytes +682 →Law and order: Changed Negative framing from a conflicting theory. undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 20:1920:19, 15 May 2022 71.117.29.63 talk 139,721 bytes +3 →Law and order undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 20:1420:14, 15 May 2022 71.117.29.63 talk 139,718 bytes −130 Removed conflicting ideological framing in the negative undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 19:2019:20, 15 May 2022 71.117.29.63 talk 139,848 bytes −233 →Race and culture undo Tags: Reverted references removed
• curprev 19:1819:18, 15 May 2022 71.117.29.63 talk 140,081 bytes −192 →Race and culture undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 19:1519:15, 15 May 2022 71.117.29.63 talk 140,273 bytes +3 →Race and culture undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 19:0819:08, 15 May 2022 71.117.29.63 talk 140,270 bytes +9 No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted

7 May 2022

• curprev 18:2418:24, 7 May 2022 PohranicniStraze talk contribs 140,261 bytes −202 unsourced commentary undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 18:1318:13, 7 May 2022 2409:4073:83:ae48::14bd:40ad talk 140,463 bytes +142 →Socialism undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 13:5513:55, 7 May 2022 2409:4073:83:ae48::14bd:40ad talk 140,321 bytes +1 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 13:5413:54, 7 May 2022 2409:4073:83:ae48::14bd:40ad talk 140,320 bytes +4 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 13:5313:53, 7 May 2022 2409:4073:83:ae48::14bd:40ad talk 140,316 bytes +55 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

6 May 2022

• curprev 18:0418:04, 6 May 2022 Vaulter talk contribs 140,261 bytes +1,025 Undid revision 1086510498 by 2601:87:1:3BD0:7D42:D8C9:A16A:9349 (talk) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 15:4215:42, 6 May 2022 2601:87:1:3bd0:7d42:d8c9:a16a:9349 talk 139,236 bytes −1,025 Once again, sources are argumentative rather than factual in an attempt to dismiss the philosophy. undo Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit
• curprev 14:3614:36, 6 May 2022 SPECIFICO talk contribs 140,261 bytes −13 →Socialism: per cited source interview in Gingrich's words undo
• curprev 14:3314:33, 6 May 2022 SPECIFICO talk contribs 140,274 bytes −2 →Socialism: per source undo
• curprev 14:2814:28, 6 May 2022 SPECIFICO talk contribs 140,276 bytes +3 →Socialism: Copyedit (minor) undo
• curprev 13:0213:02, 6 May 2022 Davide King talk contribs 140,273 bytes +529 →Socialism: Snopes and PoliFact about Thomas' quote for further context undo
• curprev 12:5812:58, 6 May 2022 Davide King talk contribs m 139,744 bytes +14 →Socialism: ce; wl undo
• curprev 12:5512:55, 6 May 2022 Davide King talk contribs m 139,730 bytes +23 →Socialism: ce undo
• curprev 12:5312:53, 6 May 2022 Davide King talk contribs m 139,707 bytes +9 ce; ---> ... per MoS undo
• curprev 12:5012:50, 6 May 2022 Davide King talk contribs m 139,698 bytes +1 →Other topics: ce undo

5 May 2022

• curprev 08:0608:06, 5 May 2022 Kku talk contribs m 139,697 bytes +4 link onservative think tank undo
• curprev 01:3401:34, 5 May 2022 Dronebogus talk contribs m 139,693 bytes +1,025 Reverted 1 edit by 2601:87:1:3BD0:D447:ADF8:6CD9:2684 (talk) to last revision by Super ninja2 undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
• curprev 01:3301:33, 5 May 2022 2601:87:1:3bd0:d447:adf8:6cd9:2684 talk 138,668 bytes −1,025 Removed argumentative sources in the introduction that attempted to unfairly discredit the overall philosophy. undo Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit

3 May 2022

• curprev 10:5410:54, 3 May 2022 Super ninja2 talk contribs 139,693 bytes +4 →Socialism: wiki link to orphan article undo

2 May 2022

• curprev 20:5920:59, 2 May 2022 X-Editor talk contribs 139,689 bytes +37 No edit summary undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 20:2720:27, 2 May 2022 Thenightaway talk contribs 139,652 bytes −331 Undid revision 1085851014 by X-Editor (talk) confusing to a global and future audience, and recentist. parental rights typically refers to child custody issues or is juxtaposed with children's rights, although it's been appropriated by one side in the most recent culture war topic undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 20:1120:11, 2 May 2022 X-Editor talk contribs 139,983 bytes +331 readding this undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• curprev 15:2015:20, 2 May 2022 Rick Norwood talk contribs 139,652 bytes −7,655 rv There have been major changes made very rapidly, claiming the opposite of what the previous versions of the article stated. In particular, among other things, the new version claims that conservatives support science, and that LGBT people are increasingly conservative. At the very least, this should be discussed in talk before such major changes are made.. undo Tag: Manual revert
• curprev 11:5111:51, 2 May 2022 2601:8c4:4380:6a30:fc1a:275d:bab:1983 talk 147,307 bytes +33 Clarifying sentence and wikilinking to US Evangelicalism since that's more relevant here. undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

1 May 2022

• curprev 05:1205:12, 1 May 2022 X-Editor talk contribs 147,274 bytes +295 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• curprev 04:4404:44, 1 May 2022 X-Editor talk contribs 146,979 bytes −278 square deal only applies to Teddy Roosevelt undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• curprev 04:4104:41, 1 May 2022 X-Editor talk contribs 147,257 bytes −764 not relevant to intelligence or the lede undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• curprev 04:3504:35, 1 May 2022 X-Editor talk contribs 148,021 bytes +23 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• curprev 04:3104:31, 1 May 2022 X-Editor talk contribs 147,998 bytes −1 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• curprev 02:4002:40, 1 May 2022 174.50.79.230 talk 147,999 bytes +12 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 02:3602:36, 1 May 2022 174.50.79.230 talk 147,987 bytes −3 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 01:4001:40, 1 May 2022 2601:8c4:4380:6a30:897d:76bc:dcc2:ccd4 talk 147,990 bytes +8,338 No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Disambiguation links added

17 April 2022

• curprev 12:3512:35, 17 April 2022 Rick Norwood talk contribs 139,652 bytes +585 restore widely known and reliably referenced material. Because Scientific American and Oxford Scholarship Online publish views that disagree with conservative views does not make them "biased". Misplaced Pages uses scholarly references. undo

16 April 2022

• curprev 23:0823:08, 16 April 2022 Dimadick talk contribs 139,067 bytes +8 No edit summary undo
• curprev 21:3221:32, 16 April 2022 Sciophobiaranger talk contribs m 139,059 bytes 0 No edit summary undo
• curprev 21:3021:30, 16 April 2022 Sciophobiaranger talk contribs 139,059 bytes +395 changed to an unbiased source that is more recent (gallup) undo
• curprev 21:0721:07, 16 April 2022 Sciophobiaranger talk contribs 138,664 bytes +1 Undid revision 1083070065 by Sciophobiaranger (talk) Gale Sinatra is also a known critic of conservatives, a look at her twitter page proves there is bias https://twitter.com/GaleSinatra undo
• curprev 21:0421:04, 16 April 2022 Sciophobiaranger talk contribs 138,663 bytes −757 Undid revision 1082991551 by Calidum (talk) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 09:3409:34, 16 April 2022 Vaulter talk contribs 139,420 bytes +757 Undid revision 1082967167 by Sciophobiaranger (talk) there's a second source undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 05:4205:42, 16 April 2022 Sciophobiaranger talk contribs 138,663 bytes −757 Naomi Oreskes is known to hold partisan perspectives when it comes to those that have differing views of science. Notably referring to those who are supportive of Nuclear energy as “climate deniers”. Perhaps a blank generalization from such a person belongs in a category more befitting of criticisms rather than what’s supposed to be a factual description. https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/how-not-to-debate-nuclear-energy-and-climate-change undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit