Misplaced Pages

Rottnest Island: Revision history

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
View logs for this page (view filter log)
Filter revisionsshowhide
External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

29 June 2022

15 June 2022

3 June 2022

1 June 2022

29 May 2022

28 May 2022

13 May 2022

12 May 2022

1 May 2022

24 April 2022

  • curprev 07:1507:15, 24 April 2022 The Logical Positivist talk contribs 71,925 bytes −1,823 Undid revision 1084387776 by Simulaun (talk) The claims about Terra Nullius go against the WP:NOR policy - none of those sources make any claim about Rottnest being 'bona fide Terra Nullius'. The source provided is also insufficient for making the claim that a place that had already been inhabited, as well as visited by other explorers, was 'officially discovered' by Vlamingh. Please stop re-adding the same content. Take it to talk page. undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 05:2205:22, 24 April 2022 Simulaun talk contribs 73,748 bytes +1,823 As requested, I have shortened the paragraphs describing landings and exploration by Dutch mariners, and added references for Terra Nullius. undo Tag: Reverted

23 April 2022

22 April 2022

21 April 2022

20 April 2022

19 April 2022

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Rottnest Island: Revision history Add topic