Misplaced Pages

19 November 2022

• curprev 23:4123:41, 19 November 2022 Arjayay talk contribs m 16,433 bytes −5 Duplicate word removed undo

17 November 2022

• curprev 15:3015:30, 17 November 2022 Goodtablemanners talk contribs 16,438 bytes 0 →Rebuttals: Probably a more accurate way of saying it. undo
• curprev 01:1501:15, 17 November 2022 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 16,438 bytes +19 Dating maintenance tags: {{Better source needed}} undo

16 November 2022

• curprev 23:1523:15, 16 November 2022 Goodtablemanners talk contribs 16,419 bytes −308 →Rebuttals: Goldberg's column may suggest that Sanger was more sympathetic to the plight of Black Americans than many of her peers but it doesn't actually say this. The column also doesn't say that eugenicists were more opposed to Asians and Hispanics than to Blacks. undo

26 October 2022

• curprev 22:4522:45, 26 October 2022 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 16,727 bytes +18 Dating maintenance tags: {{Better source needed}} undo
• curprev 20:4520:45, 26 October 2022 Goodtablemanners talk contribs 16,709 bytes +25 →Rebuttals: Also at least one other source is needed because "they" presently is only Goldberg. undo

25 October 2022

• curprev 23:3723:37, 25 October 2022 Goodtablemanners talk contribs 16,684 bytes −287 →Rebuttals: Removed a questionable rebuttal statement since the film is about a supposed attempt to destroy an outgroup by birth control and abortion, not the mainly white population of the USA in Sanger's day. undo
• curprev 23:3023:30, 25 October 2022 Goodtablemanners talk contribs 16,971 bytes −24 Goldberg ref not needed here as other references make the same point. As an obvious partisan she should be used sparingly. undo
• curprev 23:1623:16, 25 October 2022 Goodtablemanners talk contribs 16,995 bytes −76 →Rebuttals: Removing some of the opinionated stuff sourced to Goldberg has been an abortion-rights warrior since early adolescence. undo

30 August 2022

• curprev 05:2105:21, 30 August 2022 Ser Amantio di Nicolao talk contribs 17,071 bytes +34 →External links: add Category:2000s American films undo Tag: AWB

10 August 2022

• curprev 06:0606:06, 10 August 2022 Debartolo2917 talk contribs m 17,037 bytes −1 No edit summary undo

12 July 2022

• curprev 16:3516:35, 12 July 2022 Ser Amantio di Nicolao talk contribs m 17,038 bytes −28 Removing from Category:American films No longer non-diffusing using Cat-a-lot undo

29 May 2022

• curprev 13:3013:30, 29 May 2022 2600:1011:b101:2eb0:d5b4:7d42:3e2d:ab94 talk 17,066 bytes +23 Replaced advocacy slogan with neutral definition undo

21 January 2022

• curprev 22:2622:26, 21 January 2022 Goodtablemanners talk contribs 17,043 bytes −39 →Rebuttals: Minor rewording. undo

17 January 2022

• curprev 07:1107:11, 17 January 2022 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 17,082 bytes +18 Dating maintenance tags: {{Better source needed}} undo
• curprev 05:1105:11, 17 January 2022 Goodtablemanners talk contribs 17,064 bytes +3 →Rebuttals: The rates are not actually equally high and, in any case, "correlation does not prove causation." Also, Colorlines is a poor source for such statistics. undo

9 January 2022

• curprev 19:2219:22, 9 January 2022 Goodtablemanners talk contribs 17,061 bytes −127 →Synopsis: Removed misleading "fact" in what is supposed to be a synopsis of the film. As mentioned later in article, Hitler's banned abortion for "ethnic Germans" not for the kinds of outgroups that Maafa is accusing Sanger and Planned Parenthood of trying to get rid of. undo
• curprev 17:3017:30, 9 January 2022 Goodtablemanners talk contribs 17,188 bytes −2 The Metropulse article suggests but doesn't directly state that the stats cited by the film are misleading. The other sources are obviously partisan. undo
• curprev 17:0917:09, 9 January 2022 Goodtablemanners talk contribs 17,190 bytes −48 Katz's criticism doesn't need to be mentioned twice in the lead paragraphs undo
• curprev 16:1916:19, 9 January 2022 Goodtablemanners talk contribs 17,238 bytes −35 "Anti-abortion" is preferred to "pro-life" in Misplaced Pages. Politically motivated campaigns aren't usually referred to as "advertising" campaigns. undo

18 December 2021

• curprev 17:2617:26, 18 December 2021 Rynb99 talk contribs 17,273 bytes +43 added Category:Abortion in the United States using HotCat undo

2 December 2021

• curprev 03:4103:41, 2 December 2021 Binksternet talk contribs 17,230 bytes −9 trim redund undo
• curprev 03:0803:08, 2 December 2021 Goodtablemanners talk contribs 17,239 bytes +19 →Rebuttals: Description and link to bio should come at first mention of person. undo

16 November 2021

• curprev 16:1116:11, 16 November 2021 Roscelese talk contribs 17,220 bytes +167 Also not quite right + add Gberg undo
• curprev 16:0716:07, 16 November 2021 Roscelese talk contribs 17,053 bytes −1,213 ditto "critics" - journalist reportage - rm redundancies and stuff that's not about the film specifically undo
• curprev 15:5415:54, 16 November 2021 Roscelese talk contribs 18,266 bytes +119 claim of misuse of statistics is from a journalistic article; move Hitler reference to part where it makes more sense; better phrasing undo
• curprev 15:3515:35, 16 November 2021 Roscelese talk contribs 18,147 bytes −67 Rv unconstructive wording changes undo

13 November 2021

• curprev 01:2701:27, 13 November 2021 50.228.254.190 talk 18,214 bytes −157 →Synopsis: I couldn't find this particular idea stated in the sources. undo

12 November 2021

• curprev 13:3613:36, 12 November 2021 50.228.254.190 talk 18,371 bytes +19 The use of statistics in arguments over social issues is often prone to biased assumptions. on all sides. The fact that some find Maafa21's use of statistics misleading should be attributed to those with that opinion. undo
• curprev 03:4103:41, 12 November 2021 50.49.134.126 talk 18,352 bytes +132 No edit summary undo

11 November 2021

• curprev 18:5918:59, 11 November 2021 50.228.254.190 talk 18,220 bytes +50 →Rebuttals: Left the statement on Hitler banning abortion for ethnic Germans intact for now, though its relevance for critics the film is hard to see. The film focused on populations that are "unwanted", not on well accepted populations. undo
• curprev 18:4718:47, 11 November 2021 50.228.254.190 talk 18,170 bytes +29 →Rebuttals: The presentation of Goldberg as a presumably fair-minded "journalist" in this article was/is dishonest. undo
• curprev 18:4218:42, 11 November 2021 50.228.254.190 talk 18,141 bytes −10 →Rebuttals: "Certainly" unnecessary here. undo
• curprev 18:4018:40, 11 November 2021 50.228.254.190 talk 18,151 bytes −499 →Rebuttals: Rewriting paragraphs for greater objectivity. Despite her bad reputation with "pro-lifers", Sanger actually talked down abortion in favor of contraception. Ross's opinion on Alveda King's appearance is too tangential to deserve inclusion. undo
• curprev 00:4300:43, 11 November 2021 50.228.254.190 talk 18,650 bytes +9 →Rebuttals: Goldberg is known primarily as an opinion columnist and among her opinions is a deep disdain for the "pro-life" movement. undo
• curprev 00:1600:16, 11 November 2021 50.228.254.190 talk 18,641 bytes −127 Hitler may have banned such practices for "good undo
• curprev 00:1300:13, 11 November 2021 50.228.254.190 talk 18,768 bytes −40 Goldberg probably shouldn't be used as a source at all about the film, but especially not at the beginning of the article where readers might assume a somewhat objective expert is being tapped. undo

9 October 2021

• curprev 16:2016:20, 9 October 2021 Cewbot talk contribs m 18,808 bytes 0 Fix broken anchor: 2019-05-09 #Impact of colonialism and colonization→Colonialism#Impact of colonialism and colonisation undo

20 September 2021

• curprev 06:4906:49, 20 September 2021 MarydaleEd talk contribs 18,808 bytes −106 Removed strong language that had no source. I am totally baffled by the source provided because it never even mentioned this film, its content or its creator, Mark Crutcher. undo Tag: Visual edit

17 May 2021

• curprev 17:5217:52, 17 May 2021 Scorpions13256 talk contribs m 18,914 bytes +24 Copying from Category:2009 documentary films to Category:2009 films using Cat-a-lot undo

18 March 2021

• curprev 17:5717:57, 18 March 2021 Binksternet talk contribs m 18,890 bytes −730 Reverted 1 edit by 2603:301D:1B07:500:29FF:282A:67E2:4665 (talk) to last revision by Binksternet undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
• curprev 17:4417:44, 18 March 2021 2603:301d:1b07:500:29ff:282a:67e2:4665 talk 19,620 bytes +730 No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted

10 February 2021

• curprev 19:1519:15, 10 February 2021 Binksternet talk contribs 18,890 bytes −129 Reverted 1 edit by Dom6126 (talk): Rv edit warring POV undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
• curprev 19:0419:04, 10 February 2021 Dom6126 talk contribs 19,019 bytes +129 Undid revision 1006041854 by Binksternet (talk) When discussing the critic's argument that Sanger was not racist, it is important to know that she did speak at a KKK rally. She wrote that herself in her autobiography, 'Margaret Sanger, "An Autobiography," Page 366'. undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 18:4718:47, 10 February 2021 Binksternet talk contribs 18,890 bytes −129 Reverted 1 edit by Dom6126 (talk): Rv per WP:SYNTH undo Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
• curprev 18:4318:43, 10 February 2021 Dom6126 talk contribs m 19,019 bytes +129 Added information from 'Margaret Sanger, "An Autobiography," Page 366.' Removed "It should be noted." undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• curprev 18:0518:05, 10 February 2021 Larry Hockett talk contribs 18,890 bytes −145 Undid revision 1006032330 by Dom6126 (talk) we don’t exist to tell people what they should note or not note undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 17:4717:47, 10 February 2021 Dom6126 talk contribs 19,035 bytes +145 Added information from 'Margaret Sanger, "An Autobiography," Page 366' undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit

28 December 2020

• curprev 00:2900:29, 28 December 2020 Tom.Reding talk contribs m 18,890 bytes +24 Enum 1 author/editor WL; WP:GenFixes on undo Tag: AWB

15 November 2020

• curprev 00:5500:55, 15 November 2020 WikiCleanerBot talk contribs m 18,866 bytes −23 v2.04b - Bot T23 - WP:WCW project (Duplicated reference) undo Tag: WPCleaner