Misplaced Pages

TEM (nuclear propulsion): Revision history

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
View logs for this page (view filter log)
Filter revisionsshowhide
External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

1 November 2024

22 September 2024

26 December 2021

18 August 2021

28 May 2021

29 November 2020

12 November 2020

30 June 2020

29 June 2020

17 May 2020

14 April 2020

22 March 2020

11 March 2020

6 December 2019

30 September 2019

14 August 2019

16 July 2019

  • curprev 01:0701:07, 16 July 2019 2601:281:c700:45d2:dcde:de0c:37d9:c1dc talk 3,154 bytes −1 Spacecraft: This specification is almost certainly kilonewtons. Only 18 Newton’s of force nearly nothing, and certainly not enough to be useful for a spacecraft weighting 20,000 kilograms. 18 kilonewtons would put this engine on par with the thrust/thermal power ratio of previous engines. Also, the units for specific impulse were incorrect undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

1 July 2019

4 April 2019

28 February 2019

14 November 2018

17 June 2018

10 June 2018

2 June 2018

20 August 2017

18 August 2017

3 April 2017

12 January 2017

21 December 2016

20 December 2016

TEM (nuclear propulsion): Revision history Add topic