Misplaced Pages

Two-state solution: Revision history

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
View logs for this page (view filter log)
Filter revisionsshowhide
External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

9 December 2024

21 November 2024

13 November 2024

8 November 2024

7 November 2024

27 October 2024

24 October 2024

18 October 2024

13 October 2024

10 October 2024

9 October 2024

7 October 2024

4 October 2024

3 October 2024

2 October 2024

24 September 2024

18 September 2024

16 September 2024

12 September 2024

  • curprev 21:0521:05, 12 September 2024 Misha Wolf talk contribs 96,294 bytes −48 In the lead, removed the distinction between "a two-state solution" and "the two-state solution" as this appears to be based on OR. A 26 July 2024 request on the Talk page for significant RS that distinguish between these two forms has received no response. Tag: Visual edit

11 September 2024

10 September 2024

7 September 2024

6 September 2024

5 September 2024

4 September 2024

3 September 2024

  • curprev 10:4810:48, 3 September 2024 Corriebertus talk contribs 94,756 bytes +733 It is biased (propaganda) to say that tss is “widely supported in the international community” when only 56 out of 195 states vaguely demand such a plan, apparently only one state gives specific details for such a plan, and apparently no state undertakes any actual steps to practically realise any such plan or ‘solution’.
  • curprev 10:4610:46, 3 September 2024 Corriebertus talk contribs 94,023 bytes +64 It is (wishful) fantasy, (propaganda,) and OR, to state that ‘the tss proposes’…: it suggests that a (ts) solution exists already, which is not so: the conflict(s) is or are still unresolved, not even a practical plan aiming to try(!) and resolve (part of) the conflict(s) has been agreed and adopted yet; the only thing existing is the hope and demand for such a practical plan to be created and implemented.
  • curprev 10:4510:45, 3 September 2024 Corriebertus talk contribs 93,959 bytes −151 It is unsourced (propaganda) and OR to say that “a two-state solution would involve…Palestine(the existing symbolic (not sovereign) ‘state’ on West Bank+Gaza Strip+E.Jer.) and Israel”: two states means two states, most countries supporting the idea have not added such specific requirements.
  • curprev 10:4310:43, 3 September 2024 Corriebertus talk contribs 94,110 bytes −24 It is unsourced fantasy, (propaganda,) and OR to say that the two states need to be “nation states”: two states means just two states, nothing else.
  • curprev 10:4110:41, 3 September 2024 Corriebertus talk contribs 94,134 bytes +120 Support: The words ‘a’ and ‘the’ are not the same and don’t mean the same, that’s why language has given us these two different words to express our ideas. Quoting someone who speaks of “a tss” as if he spoke of “the tss” can be either an inadvertent mistake from a contributor (who is convinced that there can be only one very specific tss) or a deliberate attempt at propaganda leading the readers to believe that the quoted someone was (also) speaking of (that) ‘only one’, very specific tss.

2 September 2024

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)