Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 07:31, 10 January 2010

The Streisand effect is a primarily online phenomenon in which an attempt to censor or remove a piece of information has the unintended consequence of causing the information to be publicized widely and to a greater extent than would have occurred if no censorship had been attempted. As early as 1993, "the Net treated censorship as damage and routed around it." Examples of such attempts include censoring a photograph, a number, a file, or a website (for example via a cease-and-desist letter). Instead of being suppressed, the information receives extensive publicity, often being widely mirrored across the Internet or distributed on file-sharing networks.

Origin

Mike Masnick originally coined the term Streisand effect in reference to a 2003 incident in which Barbra Streisand unsuccessfully sued photographer Kenneth Adelman and Pictopia.com for US$50 million in an attempt to have the aerial photograph of her mansion removed from the publicly available collection of 12,000 California coastline photographs, citing privacy concerns. Adelman stated that he was photographing beachfront property to document coastal erosion as part of the California Coastal Records Project. As a result of the case, public knowledge of the picture increased substantially and it became popular on the Internet, with more than 420,000 people visiting the site over the next month.

Examples

This section may contain excessive or irrelevant examples. Please help improve the article by adding descriptive text and removing less pertinent examples.

• In September 2006, video clips portraying paparazzi footage of Brazilian television personality Daniela Cicarelli having sex with her boyfriend on a beach in Spain were uploaded to YouTube. Court injunctions, which culminated in the temporary blocking of YouTube in Brazil, proved unsuccessful in preventing the spread of the video.
• In April 2007, an attempt at blocking an AACS key from being published on Digg caused uproar when cease-and-desist letters demanded that the code be removed from several high-profile Web sites. This led to the key's proliferation across other web sites and chat rooms, in various formats, with one commentator describing it as having become "the most famous number on the Internet". Within a month, the key had been reprinted on over 280,000 pages, printed on T-shirts and tattoos, and had appeared in a song on YouTube which had been played over 45,000 times.
• In April 2007, Bhumibol Adulyadej, the King of Thailand, was portrayed with feet superimposed over his head, an act extremely offensive to many Thai people, in a video posted by a YouTube user named "Padidda". The Thai government banned the site for lèse majesté, and many other YouTube users responded by posting other clips even more offensive to Bhumibol, leading to tens of thousands of views.
• On 22 September 2007, several websites and blogs, including that of Boris Johnson went offline when site host company Fasthosts pulled the plug on various sites while aiming to take down Craig Murray’s blog. This followed Alisher Usmanov’s objection about allegedly defamatory material on Murray’s blog. Murray, the ex British Ambassador of Uzbekistan had written a book portraying Usmanov in a bad light. Usmanov hired legal firm Schillings to silence Murray, but this backfired when it became a cause célèbre and the offending material reappeared on blogs throughout the blogosphere. The material was never removed from Murray's site or book, Murray insists it is true, and Usmanov has never sued despite all his threats.
• In January 2008, The Church of Scientology's unsuccessful attempts to get Internet websites to delete a video of Tom Cruise speaking about Scientology resulted in the creation of Project Chanology. Similarly, the church attempted to remove a series of Operating Thetan (OT) document leaks from Wikileaks. Wikileaks responded by vowing to "release several thousand additional pages of Scientology material next week".
• In 2008, Lutz Heilmann, a German politician for the far-left party Die Linke and a former Stasi employee, drew national and international media attention when he caused the website www.wikipedia.de to be blocked by a preliminary injunction on November 13, 2008, and filed legal complaints against one Misplaced Pages editor and two other online writers.
• On 5 December 2008, the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) added the Misplaced Pages article about the 1976 Scorpions album Virgin Killer to a child pornography blacklist, considering the album's cover art "a potentially illegal indecent image of a child under the age of 18". The article quickly became one of the most popular pages on the site, and the publicity surrounding the censorship resulted in the image being spread across other sites. The IWF were later reported on the BBC News website to have said "IWF's overriding objective is to minimise the availability of indecent images of children on the Internet, however, on this occasion our efforts have had the opposite effect". This effect was also noted by the IWF in their statement about the removal of the URL from the black list.
• In May 2009, Twitter user Amanda Bonnen posted the following tweet to one of her 20 followers: "You should just come anyway. Who said sleeping in a moldy apartment was bad for you? Horizon realty thinks it's okay." Bonnen's landlord, Chicago's Horizon Group Management LLC, encountered the tweet while preparing for a class-action lawsuit that Bonnen had previously filed against the company. Horizon then filed a $50,000 lawsuit against Bonnen on the basis that the tweet was malicious and defamed the company. Major news outlets, technology journalists and bloggers reported on the lawsuit, and Twitter users reposted the original message along with criticism of Horizon for its actions. A tweet that originally would have only been of interest to Bonnen's 20 followers became visible to the world as a result of Horizon's reaction to it.
• In September 2009, the Photoshop Disasters blog posted an advertisement from Polo Ralph Lauren that contained a heavily manipulated image of a female model. The post was subsequently reprinted by BoingBoing. Ralph Lauren issued DMCA takedown notices to BoingBoing's ISP and Blogspot, which hosts Photoshop Disasters, claiming their use of the image infringed copyright. Blogspot complied, but BoingBoing's ISP consulted with BoingBoing and agreed that the image was fair use. As a result, BoingBoing issued a mocking rebuttal, using the same image again and posting the takedown notice. The rebuttal was widely reported, including on frequently viewed websites such as The Huffington Post and ABC News.
• On 12 October 2009, Trafigura, a Swiss multi-national commodity brokerage firm, instructed the law firm Carter-Ruck to seek an injunction preventing The Guardian newspaper from publishing a parliamentary question relating to the 2006 Côte d'Ivoire toxic waste dump scandal. The Guardian published a brief story about the injunction which led bloggers and others to track down the story and it was widely republished across the internet, became the top trending topic on Twitter and led to further questions in Parliament.
• In November 2009, Manfred Lauber and Wolfgang Werlé, convicted for the murder of Walter Sedlmayr, demanded their names to be removed from the article on the German language Misplaced Pages due to German laws. The German Misplaced Pages complied but the information was widely publicized as a result. in the following few days the visits to the page on the English Misplaced Pages increased from approximately 20 a day to over 10,000.
• In December 2009, Ted Alvin Klaudt, a former South Dakota state legislator convicted of raping his two foster daughters, attempted to claim copyright on his own name, and demanded that his name could not appear in any news articles. His demand was publicized and quickly spread to several major websites, increasing his exposure to the public.

See also

• Blowback, a term used in espionage to describe the unintended consequences of covert operations
• Herostratus: mention of his name was forbidden in an unsuccessful attempt to deny him fame
• John Gilmore: "The Net treats censorship as damage and routes around it."
• MBTA v. Anderson
• Pyrrhic victory

References

1. Philip Elmer-Dewitt (6 December 1993). "First Nation in Cyberspace". Time magazine. Retrieved 2009-12-26.
2. ^ Canton, David. "Today's Business Law: Attempt to suppress can backfire", London Free Press, November 5, 2005. Retrieved July 21, 2007. The "Streisand effect" is what happens when someone tries to suppress something and the opposite occurs. The act of suppressing it raises the profile, making it much more well known than it ever would have been".
3. Mugrabi, Sunshine. "YouTube—Censored? Offending Paula Abdul clips are abruptly taken down., Red Herring (magazine), January 22, 2007. Retrieved July 21, 2007. "Another unintended consequence of this move could be that it extends the kerfuffle over Ms. Abdul’s behavior rather than quelling it. Mr. Nguyen called this the "Barbra Streisand effect", referring to that actress’s insistence that paparazzi photos of her mansion not be used".
4. Josh Bernoff (2008). Groundswell: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press. p. 7. ISBN 1-4221-2500-9. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthor= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
5. Since When Is It Illegal to Just Mention a Trademark Online?, techdirt.com
6. The Smoking Gun
7. Rogers, Paul (2003-06-24). "Photo of Streisand home becomes an Internet hit". San Jose Mercury News, mirrored at californiacoastline.org. Retrieved 2007-06-15.
8. ^ Andy Greenberg (May 11, 2007). "The Streisand Effect". Forbes. Retrieved 2008-02-29. The phenomenon takes its name from Barbra Streisand, who made her own ill-fated attempt at reining in the Web in 2003. That's when environmental activist Kenneth Adelman posted aerial photos of Streisand's Malibu beach house on his Web site as part of an environmental survey, and she responded by suing him for $50 million. Until the lawsuit, few people had spotted Streisand's house, Adelman says--but the lawsuit brought more than a million visitors to Adelman's Web site, he estimates. Streisand's case was dismissed, and Adelman's photo was picked up by the Associated Press and reprinted in newspapers around the world.
9. Brad Stone (May 3, 2007). "How a Number Became the Latest Web Celebrity". New York Times. Retrieved 2008-02-29. Sophisticated Internet users have banded together over the last two days to publish and widely distribute a secret code used by the technology and movie industries to prevent piracy of high-definition movies.
10. kdawson (May 1, 2007). "Digg.com Attempts To Suppress HD-DVD Revolt". Retrieved 2007-05-01.
11. Mathew Ingram (January 19, 2008). "Scientology vs. the Internet, part XVII". The Globe & Mail. Retrieved 2008-01-19.
12. ^ http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/mar/20/streisand-effect-internet-law
13. http://www.complex.com/blogs/2009/07/24/the-streisand-effect-when-internet-censorship-backfires/
14. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/miloyiannopoulos/8248311/What_is_The_Streisand_Effect/
15. "Church of Scientology warns Wikileaks over documents". Wikinews. 4 July 2008.
16. Un ex-agent de la Stasi fait fermer le site allemand Wikipédia, Le Monde, 17 November 2008. Template:Fr icon
17. German Misplaced Pages back online after dispute., Miami Herald, 17 November 2008.
18. Schofield, Jack (8 December 2008). "Misplaced Pages page censored in the UK for 'child pornography'". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 9 December 2008.
19. Cade Metz (December 7, 2008). "Brit ISPs censor Misplaced Pages over 'child porn' album cover". The Register. Retrieved 2008-12-09.
20. Moses, Asher (December 8, 2008). "Misplaced Pages added to child pornography blacklist". Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 2008-12-09.
21. "IWF backs down on Wiki censorship". BBC News Online. December 9, 2008. Retrieved 2008-12-09.
22. "Living with the Streisand Effect". International Herald Tribune. 2008-12-26. Retrieved 2008-12-29. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
23. "IWF statement regarding Misplaced Pages webpage". Internet Watch Foundation. December 9, 2008. Retrieved 2008-12-09.
24. Benny Evangelista (July 31, 2009). "Twitter post leads to lawsuit". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2009-07-31.
25. "Ralph Lauren opens new outlet store in the Uncanny Valley". Boing boing. 29 September 2009.
26. "The criticism that Ralph Lauren doesn't want you to see!". Boing boing. 6 October 2009.
27. "Boing Boing And Ralph Lauren Clash Over Image Of Emaciated Model". Huffington Post. 6 October 2009.
28. "11 Photo-Editing Flubs: Ralph Lauren Ad Sparks Controversy". ABC News.
29. "Guardian injunction: Lib Dems table urgent question". Mark Pack. 13 October 2009.
30. "Twitter Can't Be Gagged". Guardian Online. Retrieved October 13, 2009.
31. "Minton Report Secret Injunction gagging Guardian on Trafigura". Wikileaks. Retrieved October 15, 2009.
32. Two German Killers Demanding Anonymity Sue Misplaced Pages’s Parent, New York Times, 12 November 2009
33. http://stats.grok.se/en/200911/Walter_Sedlmayr
34. Ex-Lawmaker Convicted of Rape: Name Is Copyrighted, The New York Times, December 16 2009

External links

• Blog standard, Economist magazine, 26 June 2008
• California Coastal Records Project - Image 3850 - "Streisand Estate, Malibu"

v t e Anonymous and the Internet
Guy Fawkes mask Imageboard Internet vigilantism Low Orbit Ion Cannon
Related websites	4chan 420chan Distributed Denial of Secrets Encyclopedia Dramatica WikiLeaks
Groups	Ghost Security LulzSec MalSec RedHack
Activities	February 2010 Australian cyberattacks Operation AntiSec Operation Payback Project Chanology Activities during the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine more
Internet portal

• Articles with dead external links from October 2008
• Internet censorship in the United States
• Internet culture
• Historical deletion