Misplaced Pages

User talk:115.188.247.153: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:50, 29 July 2012 editAnir1uph (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,924 edits Final Warning: Adding original research, including unpublished syntheses of sourced material on Intercontinental ballistic missile. (TW)← Previous edit Revision as of 03:18, 29 July 2012 edit undoAnir1uph (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,924 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on India and weapons of mass destruction. (TW)Next edit →
Line 7: Line 7:


] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you violate Misplaced Pages's ] by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at ], you may be '''] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-nor4 --> ] | ] | ] 01:50, 29 July 2012 (UTC) ] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you violate Misplaced Pages's ] by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at ], you may be '''] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-nor4 --> ] | ] | ] 01:50, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
:''If this is a ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice -->

] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] | ] | ] 03:18, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
:''If this is a ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> :''If this is a ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice -->

Revision as of 03:18, 29 July 2012

July 2012

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to India and weapons of mass destruction. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Anir1uph | talk | contrib 19:46, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at India and weapons of mass destruction, you may be blocked from editing. Anir1uph | talk | contrib 23:26, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Misplaced Pages's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Intercontinental ballistic missile, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Anir1uph | talk | contrib 01:50, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at India and weapons of mass destruction shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Anir1uph | talk | contrib 03:18, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
User talk:115.188.247.153: Difference between revisions Add topic