Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/World-2023 ESN Publications and London Organisation of Skills Development Ltd: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:27, 15 January 2025 editPoxxie-Loxxie454 (talk | contribs)177 edits →World-2023 ESN Publications and London Organisation of Skills Development Ltd: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit Revision as of 05:58, 15 January 2025 edit undoPoxxie-Loxxie454 (talk | contribs)177 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ] lists for the following topics: ], ], and ]. ] (]) 12:28, 14 January 2025 (UTC)</small> *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ] lists for the following topics: ], ], and ]. ] (]) 12:28, 14 January 2025 (UTC)</small>


:Hello Fram. While the sourcing of this topic could use improvement, I would like to argue that holding a Guinness Book of World Records title does in fact meet Wikipedias lasting notability requirement. ] (]) 03:35, 15 January 2025 (UTC) :Hello Fram. While the sourcing of this topic could use improvement, I would like to argue that holding a Guinness Book of World Records title does, in fact, meet Misplaced Pages's lasting notability requirement. ] (]) 03:35, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
::Following up to my previous message: I have not found any rule for Misplaced Pages in reference to the sources I used being ineligible. Additionally, if you are implying that it's notability would be taken when the record was surpassed, I would like to inform you that the book will still have held the record for every year that it has earned the title. ] (]) 05:27, 15 January 2025 (UTC) ::Following up on my previous message, I have not found any rule for Misplaced Pages in reference to the sources I used being ineligible. Additionally, if you are implying that it's notability would be taken when the record is surpassed, I would like to inform you that the book will still have held the record for every year that it has earned the title. ] (]) 05:27, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:58, 15 January 2025

World-2023 ESN Publications and London Organisation of Skills Development Ltd

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

World-2023 ESN Publications and London Organisation of Skills Development Ltd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Gimmick mainly sourced to glorified press releases like this one. No lasting notability. Fram (talk) 12:28, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello Fram. While the sourcing of this topic could use improvement, I would like to argue that holding a Guinness Book of World Records title does, in fact, meet Misplaced Pages's lasting notability requirement. Poxxie-Loxxie454 (talk) 03:35, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Following up on my previous message, I have not found any rule for Misplaced Pages in reference to the sources I used being ineligible. Additionally, if you are implying that it's notability would be taken when the record is surpassed, I would like to inform you that the book will still have held the record for every year that it has earned the title. Poxxie-Loxxie454 (talk) 05:27, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Categories: