Misplaced Pages

User:Casprings/sandbox: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User:Casprings Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:42, 25 January 2021 editCasprings (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,762 editsNo edit summaryTag: 2017 wikitext editor← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:50, 12 June 2021 edit undoCasprings (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,762 editsNo edit summaryTag: 2017 wikitext editor 
(27 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{| cellpadding=5 style="border:1px solid #AA6633"
|- bgcolor="#fafeff"
|
<u>'''Reasons to use the verb "attack"'''</u>


Based on the multiple move requests , , , ,,,,,,,, and and ], this RFC is designed to provide editors with an opportunity to ] the verb used in the title. The idea is to gain consensus by using rank choice methodology so that we can account for editors that have a first choice that lacks consensus but have second and third choices that may have consensus. The verb in consideration:
'''1.''' Attack clearly meets ] better then any other verb. Using a ] search, and only looking at the '''titles''', one can clearly see that the term attack is favored by writers of WP:RS news sources.


* assault
::* '''attack'''
* attack
::*'''Riot''' ,
* breach
::* '''insurrection '''
* coup attempt
::* '''storming''' is .
* incident
* insurrection
* invasion
* occupation
* protest
* raid
* rampage
* riot
* siege
* storming
* takeover


I would ask that editors format their votes by listing their choices from 1st choice to last choice at the start of their response, then provide the rationale for their ordering.
'''2.''' Attack is inherently a neutral word but captures the significance of the event. Attacks can be negative or positive, depending on the circumstances. For example, the ] versus ]. In sum, attack best meets ].

<u>'''Reasons not to use "storm"'''</u>

'''1.''' As the results show, storm is an extremely bad choice for ].

'''2.''' Storm is not a good choice for ]. First, I would note the connection of the word storm to ]. Second, I would note the connections the participates themselves made between the event and ]. For example, a quote from the New York Times, .
{{Blockquote
|text=It’s like the Storming of the Bastille as recreated by the cast of National Lampoon’s Animal House. These photos will outlive us all
|author=Ben Sixsmith}}
Given the historical circumstances, the use of the word storm, maximizes seeing the events in a positive light.

<u>'''Reasons to no include the year'''</u>

'''1.''' ] applies here. As the event is closer to ] as far as an historical event. As the policy says, "Some articles do not need a year for disambiguation when, in historic perspective, the event is easily described without it." This is a judgement call, but I suggest the year is not needed.}}
|}

Latest revision as of 15:50, 12 June 2021

Based on the multiple move requests , , , ,,,,,,,, and and the excellent analysis on names used by RSes, this RFC is designed to provide editors with an opportunity to rank choice the verb used in the title. The idea is to gain consensus by using rank choice methodology so that we can account for editors that have a first choice that lacks consensus but have second and third choices that may have consensus. The verb in consideration:

  • assault
  • attack
  • breach
  • coup attempt
  • incident
  • insurrection
  • invasion
  • occupation
  • protest
  • raid
  • rampage
  • riot
  • siege
  • storming
  • takeover

I would ask that editors format their votes by listing their choices from 1st choice to last choice at the start of their response, then provide the rationale for their ordering.