Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 18:39, 27 January 2007

Welcome!(We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Ploughman, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Learn from others
• Be kind to others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us a bit about yourself
• Our great guide to Misplaced Pages
• Tutorials and editing suggestions

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Help desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! ~~~~, let me know if you need any help with tables! -- feb 00:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edit to Criticisms of Communist party rule:

Your recent edit to Criticisms of Communist party rule (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 04:01, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Ploughman, I agree with you that the article is horribly written and unfocused. I'd favor just as much as anyone blanking the entire page and starting a new aritcle. But the main author of the article spends considerable time watching the article daily. Because the main author makes sure little of the content is removed, the only thing editors trying to improve the article can do is copyedit the work, rather than making major changes. 172 | Talk 04:08, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Misplaced Pages pages, such as those you made to Cheka, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you.--Strothra 07:21, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Second edit to Cheka

Please refrain from making test edits in Misplaced Pages pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Ronbo76 07:33, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:3RR violation at Cheka

Please check, what 3RR means. You've broken the rule are near to breaking the rule on Cheka article. Newbies are not blocked, if they do not know the rules yet. Now you know. Constanz - Talk 09:48, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Edit to User:C.J. Griffin user page and my talkpage

You may wish to be very careful about issuing warnings. Just about all your edits to Cheka have been reversed. You seem to have a problem with Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view edits. You may wish to review that article on how to make neutral POV edits. Ronbo76 16:15, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Actually, this something with which you have a problem. You ought to first familiarize yourself with Misplaced Pages: Neutral point of view. You are determined on pushing a perspective which tries to negatively portray the subject at hand instead of abiding by Misplaced Pages's NPOV policies. This will be resisted. --Ploughman 18:02, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

3RR at Mengistu Haile Mariam

You appear to have committed many more than the 3 reverts allowed at Mengistu Haile Mariam. To prevent this edit war from continuing, now that I have warned you, you may have to be blocked from editing of wikipedia, if you ignore the warning. ፈቃደ (ውይይት) 18:39, 27 January 2007 (UTC)