| Revision as of 09:23, 24 August 2021 editCertes (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users243,573 edits →Bypass redirect: new sectionTag: Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:35, 24 August 2021 edit undoWalter Görlitz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers294,571 edits +Tag: RevertedNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| Hello and thank you for your contributions. Just a quick note to remind you that it's usually not necessary to bypass redirects: most are harmless, and some are actually better than direct links to the articles. Further details: ]. Thanks again, ] (]) 09:23, 24 August 2021 (UTC) | Hello and thank you for your contributions. Just a quick note to remind you that it's usually not necessary to bypass redirects: most are harmless, and some are actually better than direct links to the articles. Further details: ]. Thanks again, ] (]) 09:23, 24 August 2021 (UTC) | ||
| : Just coming to say the same thing. Unless you're planning on nominating the redirect for deletion, I see no reason to "fix" a redirect. ] (]) 16:35, 24 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:35, 24 August 2021
RfC notice
This is a neutral notice sent to all non-bot/non-blocked registered users who edited Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Linguistics in the past year that there is a new request for comment at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Linguistics § RfC: Where should so-called voiceless approximants be covered?. Nardog (talk) 10:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Bypass redirect
Hello and thank you for your contributions. Just a quick note to remind you that it's usually not necessary to bypass redirects: most are harmless, and some are actually better than direct links to the articles. Further details: WP:NOTBROKEN. Thanks again, Certes (talk) 09:23, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
- Just coming to say the same thing. Unless you're planning on nominating the redirect for deletion, I see no reason to "fix" a redirect. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:35, 24 August 2021 (UTC)