Misplaced Pages

User talk:Donteatyellowsnow: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:01, 30 January 2007 editAgent 86 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,071 edits {{subst:uw-npa1}}← Previous edit Revision as of 22:47, 30 January 2007 edit undoJGGardiner (talk | contribs)2,725 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 67: Line 67:


That's just my perspective - your mileage may vary. ] 21:56, 30 January 2007 (UTC) That's just my perspective - your mileage may vary. ] 21:56, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

==Hollywood disambig==
Hi. I know that you didn't listen to my advice regarding minor edits. That's fine. If you don't want to observe Misplaced Pages etiquette, it is your right to be rude (to a certain extent, see ]) if you want to be. However, you should know the more important policy regarding reversions, ]. Violations of this are probably the most common way for editors to be blocked so you really should be familiar with this. Thanks. --] 22:47, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:47, 30 January 2007

This page has been vandalized and/or threats and personal attacks have repeatedly been made to me by WikiFascists who are Canadian nationalists trying to promote their own country (see "Hollywood North") with an extreme POV that allows for no other non-Canadian input. But don't just believe me! Check their contributions pages and you will see the Canadian nationalistic bent. Donteatyellowsnow

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Agent 86 22:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Your username

You might be asked to change it, as its implications are vulgar. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 05:20, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Is implication a crime in Canada? Or do you mean insinuation? Is snow a bad word? Is yellow a bad color? Or do you object to the juxtaposition of the two words as not being Canadian enough? BTW - as I have previously stated the name has nothing to do with Canada and was created long before I stumbled upon the "Hollywood North" Canadian film commission PR page.Donteatyellowsnow

Assumption

I believe you called: User:Ckatz, User:Skookum1, and myself "The people from the "Hollywood North" site". First of all, that's an assumption based upon no evidence, nor will you find any since its not true. I find it rather offensive that'd you be spreading those rumours around Misplaced Pages and anyone with any insight would see that we've been around Misplaced Pages long before the article Hollywood North. I am warning to to refrain from spreading tasteless rumours about other people. Mkdw 07:14, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Anyone can click on that page's history and see that you guys are REGULAR contributors to it. YOU even wrote as many as 44 different entries between Christmas Eve and Christmas day alone (apparently staying up all night to do it). That's not just some innocent "bystander". And I don't really understand what "rumors" you think I'm spreading? I don't know you. All I know is the attacks you have made against me on this page and the "Hollywood North" page and that you are a regular contributor to it:
  • (cur) (last) 08:04, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (→Vancouver)
  • (cur) (last) 08:01, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (→Vancouver)
  • (cur) (last) 07:54, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (Image)
  • (cur) (last) 07:29, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (references)
  • (cur) (last) 07:28, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (→Toronto)
  • (cur) (last) 07:13, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (→Vancouver)
  • (cur) (last) 06:59, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (ISBN)
  • (cur) (last) 06:42, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (removal of redundant information)
  • (cur) (last) 06:40, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) m (grammar)
  • (cur) (last) 06:38, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (addition)
  • (cur) (last) 03:56, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (layout)
  • (cur) (last) 03:39, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (Statisics Canada reference)
  • (cur) (last) 03:34, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) m (→Toronto)
  • (cur) (last) 03:33, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (→Vancouver)
  • (cur) (last) 03:30, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (→Toronto)
  • (cur) (last) 03:22, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (→Vancouver)
  • (cur) (last) 03:18, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (→Toronto)
  • (cur) (last) 03:14, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (Side sectioning)
  • (cur) (last) 03:10, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) m (→Vancouver)
  • (cur) (last) 03:10, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (→Vancouver)
  • (cur) (last) 03:07, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (→Toronto)
  • (cur) (last) 03:07, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (→Toronto)
  • (cur) (last) 02:52, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (→Vancouver)
  • (cur) (last) 02:50, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (→Toronto)
  • (cur) (last) 02:49, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (→Toronto)
  • (cur) (last) 02:42, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) m (→Toronto)
  • (cur) (last) 02:40, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (→Vancouver)
  • (cur) (last) 02:39, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (trial)
  • (cur) (last) 02:33, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (→Toronto)
  • (cur) (last) 02:24, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (→Toronto)
  • (cur) (last) 02:22, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) m (→Vancouver)
  • (cur) (last) 02:21, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (→Vancouver)
  • (cur) (last) 02:16, 25 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (Toronto)
  • (cur) (last) 22:34, 24 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (→Vancouver)
  • (cur) (last) 22:26, 24 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (Second for Television)
  • (cur) (last) 22:17, 24 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (→Television)
  • (cur) (last) 22:13, 24 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (Television)
  • (cur) (last) 22:11, 24 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (External Links)
  • (cur) (last) 22:08, 24 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (Vancouver)
  • (cur) (last) 21:37, 24 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (BC Film Commission reference)
  • (cur) (last) 21:35, 24 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (another reference)
  • (cur) (last) 21:18, 24 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (References section)
  • (cur) (last) 21:18, 24 December 2006 Mkdw (Talk | contribs) (reference) - Donteatyellowsnow

Hollywood North

I noticed that you recently readded some content which had been removed by Mkdw. That's fine, we're supposed to make bold edits. But I noticed that you tagged your edit as minor. Minor edits are only for truly minor things like spelling errors and formatting issues, etc. Some users have their preferences set to not show minor edits on their watchlists so they wouldn't be aware that a change was made. For that reason it is usually considered bad etiquette to mark real changes as minor. Thanks. --JGGardiner 20:10, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to Hollywood North. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Agent 86 21:53, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Hollywood North

I'm pretty sure your last edit to Hollywood North actually contained worthwhile, constructive information. However, because of your past edits, especially the tone of those edits, it seems editors are inclined to just revert your edits without paying too much attention.

That said, your last edit (with the George Lucas sourcing) also contained a cornucopia of POV language, unencyclopaedic insinuations and the like. If you want your productive edits to last, you've got to start formatting them in a productive light, and steer clear of the kind of commentary that has upset other editors in the past.

That's just my perspective - your mileage may vary. WilyD 21:56, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Hollywood disambig

Hi. I know that you didn't listen to my advice regarding minor edits. That's fine. If you don't want to observe Misplaced Pages etiquette, it is your right to be rude (to a certain extent, see Misplaced Pages:Civility) if you want to be. However, you should know the more important policy regarding reversions, the 3RR. Violations of this are probably the most common way for editors to be blocked so you really should be familiar with this. Thanks. --JGGardiner 22:47, 30 January 2007 (UTC)