Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 02:24, 4 February 2007

Your Republic of China edits

You are making significant edits to a wide number of articles and it is unclear what the point of this is. If the map that you keep removing at e.g., is not right then please provide a valid map instead. The article clearly states that "Today the Republic of China is often known as "Chinese Taipei" or "Taiwan" and the Map clearly states that it is refering to Taiwan and so I do not see the logic of removing a map that the article agrees is valid. Misplaced Pages is not about what is true but what is verifiable. I guess I could edit the map and "photoshop" Taiwan and replace that with "Republic Of China" by why bother if this is already clear. Ttiotsw 09:17, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

• I simply want to WP:cleanup the article, to make it more understandable for the public. Tonytypoon 22:22, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
• These edits are getting confusing. The vast majority of English readers and writers do not refers to Taiwan as RoC or RoC on Taiwan. They might be appropriate within specific context. However, most people refer to the RoC as Taiwan. It is used in all English newspaper articles and references. People don't refer to the UK or Britain as the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Most people refer to China as China and not as the People's Republic of China. Likewise for North Korea, etc. More importantly, using RoC instead of Taiwan will confuse most people because the word "China" is most often used to mean the PRoC. There is no reason for these mass edits. --Comatose51 08:58, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Can you stop changing Taiwan into Taiwan,ROC, or ROC? ROC is known as Taiwan. Stop saying Taiwan isn't a country.--Jerrypp772000 21:19, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Your edits reflect unenforceable extraterritorial claims

I feel uncomfortable that Misplaced Pages is being edited across a number of articles to remove the word Taiwan whenever the sequence Republic of China or ROC is used. In places it is gramatically edited to say "ROC on Taiwan" which makes poor or little sense in English. This kind of edit has also damaged intra-article content links. The aim of your edits is to reflect the now-obsolete extraterritorial constitutional claims of the Republic of China in Misplaced Pages. These claims are embodied in your edit summary of or e.g. you claim that "This article isn't just about the ROC on Taiwan, but also the ROC on Mainland China. ROC is not equal to Taiwan, so that map is misleading. ROC's territory includes all of Mainland China, Mongolia,etc". This is nonsense as the Republic of China is not even a recognised country by many. The ROC article reflects current scope of the country not anachronistic claims. The Foreign_relations_of_Mongolia article shows the nonsense of the ROC extra-territorial claims as Mongolia is a UN, WHO, ITU etc etc member. Misplaced Pages should reflect what is in fact the reality of modern politics not wishful thinking. For edits to ROC to be made to claim Mongolia is non-Neutral and certainly does not reflect modern political reality. I would suggest that you show more willing to negotiate other than simply continuously reverting peoples edits with the same summary and you can do this by adding a map to the Republic of China article which accurately reflects the territorial extent. Ttiotsw 08:40, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Map of Taiwan

I have again replaced the map of Taiwan (image) that you deleted from Republic of China. I am NOT arguing with you regarding ROC's claims to all of China - that is, as you say, a fact. But, in turn, I ask that you acknowledge the FACT that ROC is currently PHYSICALLY located on Taiwan, and the FACT that such a map IS useful to readers.

I also understand that you may feel that the caption of the map is wrong. If so, please CHANGE THE CAPTION. The caption CAN be edited by you. Please do NOT remove the entire map if you disagree with the caption. Thanks. John Broughton | Talk 14:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

SVG??

Is it possible to upload SVG files, and have wiki automatically convert it on the fly to png? If so how do I do this, when I tried to upload an SVG it said it was not a recommended format, I did not see a way to force it to go. I noticed in the uploaded files area you have a couple that are .svg.png. Anyway, please resond on my user-talk page. Thanks. --Green-Dragon 06:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Lin Chiling article

The Lin Chiling article does not conform to Misplaced Pages standards and requires cleanup. A simple listing of "facts" is not a Misplaced Pages article. DO NOT REMOVE THE TEMPLATE AGAIN. If you refuse to conform to the rules of Misplaced Pages, I will have to report your actions as vandalism. If you disagree with the edits, please discuss in the talk page for the article, which is linked to by the template. I added the citation tag because we disagree on some "facts". If you disagree, please cite creditable sources. Comatose51 08:45, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Reply...

Thanxs for the message. It's controversial to label "Taiwan" as a province. It's administered by the ROC government, but the country and the government that governs it are collectively known as Taiwan in popular lingual. There no need to remove info regarding the position of Taiwan and it's neighboring islands. The current version is based on years of discussions on the Taiwan talk page, so try not to mess with the consensus derived from all the discussions.
I understand where you're coming from, but try to remain as nonpartisan as possible on Misplaced Pages. =D Jumping cheese 05:06, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

See Talk: Taiwan and Talk: Republic of China. There more than enough disputes regarding the name of "Taiwan" to shake a stick at. I checked the page history of Taiwan and did not find the pervious version you claimed. For example, see , a random diff from over a year ago. I'm going to revert your edits and I going to have to ask you to withhold from engaging in a edit war before the dispute is settled. Thanxs! Jumping cheese 06:15, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

3RR block

You are blocked from editing wikipedia for 24h. WP:3RR vio.--CSTAR 06:34, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Nationalist (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Other people also violated this but they did not get blocked. It is unfair that I was the only one who got blocked. Also, I would just like to carry on the discussion about this topic with Cheese and others so I would like to be unblocked ASAP

Decline reason:

While I can understand your frustration, 3RR blocks are put in place specifically to discourage edit warring; you'll still be quite able to edit and discuss, once the block expires, provided you avoid any further 3RR violations. Looking at the page history, I didn't see any other editors go over 3 reverts, but if I'm missing some, feel free to link the diffs in question (you may want to email me if you do so. Please consider dispute resolution once your block expires. Apologies. Luna Santin 10:36, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Edits to Chien-Ming Wang

Your recent contribution(s) to Misplaced Pages did not provide specific references or sources. Keeping Misplaced Pages accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Misplaced Pages by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. Editors may choose to remove material you have contributed if it is not verifiable. Please provide specific references in your contributions to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content. You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Yankees76 05:57, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. Vic226_(chat) 16:12, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

1. Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Chien-Ming Wang is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Yankees76 03:56, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Yankees76 03:56, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Edits to Guantian, Tainan

Stop it! Guantian is in Taiwan. On the island, and in the ROC, which is known as Taiwan. Again, see the naming conventions for yourself! Taiwan is the common name for the ROC. Stop trying to confuse the people. And if you really like the ROC that much, there is a link to the ROC in Taiwan anyways.

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. --Jerrypp772000 15:33, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Chi-ling Lin Mediation Request

I've accepted the request for mediation on this article. Please leave a quick note on my talk page that you're aware of this and we can begin the discussion there. Flakeloaf 16:38, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

helllo, are you user chiang kai-shek from before? You don't wanna get banned again man BlueShirts 20:00, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: User Jerrypp772000 has violated 3RR

Looking at the history of Guantian, Tainan, it looks like nobody's made more than three reverts at this point in time. You're welcome to make a report at the 3RR noticeboard, if you like. All else aside, I'd encourage you to do everything possible to discuss your changes on talk pages instead of revert warring. We have a fairly robust dispute resolution process, on the wiki, and you're free to make use of it. In disputes with only two users, requests for a third opinion can be very helpful. Luna Santin 23:04, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Hey!

so...blueshirt brings up a point. Are you User:Heqong?!? Not that I mind, but the edits look rather similar. Jumping cheese 06:49, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Your contributions history shows that you have been aggressively cross-posting in order to influence the birthplace of Chien-Ming Wang. Although the Arbitration Committee has ruled that "he occasional light use of cross-posting to talk pages is part of Misplaced Pages's common practice", such cross-posting should adhere to specific guidelines found in Misplaced Pages:Spam. In the past, aggressively worded cross-posting has contributed towards an Arbitration Committee ruling of disruptive behavior that resulted in blocking. It is best not to game the system, and instead respect Misplaced Pages's principle of consensus-building, by ceasing to further crosspost, and instead allowing the process to reflect the opinions of editors that were already actively involved in the matter at hand. Thank you.16:47, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Template:LadnavYankees76 16:47, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

hey nationalist, I suggest you talk to Jiang or miborovsky about it. I think they have had experiences with this sort of idiocy, the guy just doesn't get it. The CIA World Factbook doesn't even mention "ROC", so does that mean the ROC doesn't exist? Fucking dumbasses, and I blame china for that. I think we all better call ourselves Chinese Taipei from now on, since that's what the official taiwanese baseball association calls itself in english, jeez. BlueShirts 23:49, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Guantian

Stop editing Guantian, Tainan, Jiali, and Madou, I already told the reasons many times.

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing.--Jerrypp772000 03:13, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

You have removed several user warnings from your user or user talk page. These warnings are not put on your talk page to annoy you; they were placed here because other editors have noticed an issue with your behaviour that may require improvement. They are a method of communication and user talk pages stand as a record of communication with you. If you do not believe the warning was valid or have a question about improving your behaviour you can respond here or visit the help desk. If your talk page is becoming long, you can archive it in accordance with the guidelines laid out here. Thank you. Vic226_(chat) 20:41, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop editing Madou. I've explained this w/ you before! See the naming conventions. Thank you.--Jerrypp772000 20:33, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Please read what I said in Talk:Rende, Tainan, and stop editing the article. There are more reasons to put Taiwan there instead of Taiwan, ROC. Also, please stop saying that I support Taiwan independence. I am only trying to help readers. Please assume good faith and stop being stubborn, thanks.--Jerrypp772000 22:37, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Please don't call my contributions as junks!--Jerrypp772000 01:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding the talk page of Rende, Tainan, you vandalized the headline I created:. I don't appreciate that, please stop vandalizing things in Misplaced Pages.--Jerrypp772000 22:36, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Although you have been blocked 4 times, I've been trying to get you, a new user, to understand the rules. I had also tried to discuss with you peacefully. And I want you to know that I will, in the future, treat you like a normal editor, because I always assume good faith, but mainly because I want you to understand I try to have a NPOV. I just want to make Misplaced Pages a better encyclopedia that doesn't confuse people.--Jerrypp772000 20:33, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Let me explain why you should not say that I'm a POV pusher. Not only should you assume good faith, I think the main reason is that there are four kinds of people who would prefer Taiwan over ROC:

1. Supporters of Taiwan independence
2. Chinese editors who don't recognize ROC on purpose
3. People that don't know the Chinese history very well
4. People that want most people to not be confuse reading Taiwan-related articles

I believe over 90% of the people on earth fit into one of these, especially the third. However, the 1st two are POV pushers, I believe I fit into the 4th. So just to make it clear, I am just helping the encyclopedia. Sorry if I violated the disputed naming conventions for Chinese, but some naming conventions really should be revised since ROC is becoming more commonly known as Taiwan.--Jerrypp772000 01:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

, Don't call me stupid please. I wrote currently because it wasn't governed by ROC until 1949. So that's not stupid.--Jerrypp772000 20:58, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to Yuanlin, Changhua, please stop making the article confusing. If you keep being stubborn, you might be blocked for violating 3RR.--Jerrypp772000 00:08, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you keep being stubborn on the article Yuanlin, Changhua, you may be blocked.--Jerrypp772000 02:00, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

User pages are not yours

Please read Misplaced Pages:User_page#Ownership_and_editing_of_pages_in_the_user_space and you will see that you are not allowed to remove warnings from your talk page. User pages belong to the community and not you. Thanks. --Borgarde 04:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Taiwan and the Republic of China

I take it you are from the Republic of China. Please note that this encyclopedia is in English. In the English speaking world Taiwan is the common name for Republic of China, while China is the common name for People's Republic of China. Please stop removing Taiwan and adding Republic of China, most of the English speaking world would not be familiar with the situation with both Chinas. But, they will recognise Taiwan as ROC, and China as PROC. --Borgarde 04:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

You know the only nations that would be familiar w/ the ROC are the ones in East Asia, not including China. Taiwan is the common name for the ROC since like 80 years ago.--Jerrypp772000 17:56, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

It is sad that you don't get it. I wasn't trying to give you the fact, I was just trying to tell you it's a long time.--Jerrypp772000 17:16, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

And also, you are totally wrong, I was born and bred in Taiwan. And I doubt that you know more about Taiwan, ROC ,and the PRC then I do. I don't care if you are from the ROC or not, the facts are the facts. Taiwan is the common name for the ROC.--Jerrypp772000 17:21, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

I also want to address this: Taiwan is a geographical place, while the Republic of China is a political term for the government now administrating in Taiwan. Therefore, Taiwan is ultimately NOT the same as Republic of China. Saying "Chien-Ming Wang is born in Republic of China" is downright absurd since nobody would say he/she is born under some kind of governmental control. Saying "Wang is bron in Tainan City, Taiwan, ROC (or Republic of China)" is also pointless since almost no one would care to know which government power is administrating Taiwan when reading some Taiwanese person's article. All in all, please refrain from establishing your "cold hard facts" which involves political viewpoints. With only one viewpoint in confusing subjects such as politics, it will constitute a POV statement no matter what. Vic226_(chat) 18:03, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Disruption of Chien-Ming Wang Article

1. Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits . If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. The three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Yankees76 05:00, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Yankees76 05:00, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Template:Uw-3rr2Yankees76 03:46, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Removal of editing warnings

You have removed several user warnings from your user or user talk page. These warnings are not put on your talk page to annoy you; they were placed here because other editors have noticed an issue with your behaviour that may require improvement. They are a method of communication and user talk pages stand as a record of communication with you. If you do not believe the warning was valid or have a question about improving your behaviour you can respond here or visit the help desk. If your talk page is becoming long, you can archive it in accordance with the guidelines laid out here. Thank you. MKoltnow 05:47, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

For your convenience: Tuxide 05:53, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

1. This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Misplaced Pages, you will be blocked. MKoltnow 06:10, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Profanity block

24 hrs. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

See now you've been blocked twice, because you just can't follow the rules! Just stop it and just read what people are trying to tell you!--Jerrypp772000 22:51, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

User Talk Page Vandalism

1. All contributions are strongly appreciated and encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, particularly to userpages.. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Yankees76 14:06, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits

I would like to express my concern with several of your recent mass edits replacing and redirecting Taiwan links to Taiwan Province as well as mass insertions/replacements of Republic of China. "Taiwan" is commonly used to refer to the geograhical region and has generally been used in contexts not directly concerning the issues of sovereignty and political status, e.g. Chien-Ming Wang, while ROC is used when referencing political topics. Please see Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions (Chinese)#Political NPOV and the associated talk page for past discussions on this topic and why we choose to maintain a certain degree of ambiguity on nonpolitical topics. If you feel the present conventions are inadequate, feel free to discuss them on the talk page prior to making any unilateral edits of this sort. It may not be your intent but mass changes concerning a controversial issue tend to raise soapboxing alarms. And finally, I realize this is an emotionally charged topic, but please try to be civil when engaging in discourse with other editors. Thanks. -Loren 01:50, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: . In response to your other allegation regarding my personal political views, I intervene when edit disputes become disruptive to Misplaced Pages as a whole, irrespective of the POV being promoted. No one is 100% neutral, but I think my past record (which you are free to examine) has been fairly evenhanded in that I've been accused of favoring pretty much every possible side in the whole Taiwan debate by various editors at various times. I would say that I find it puzzling that you seem unable to seperate my personal views with my course of action in intervening, but given the behavior I have observed you engaging in, doesn't come as a particular surprise. I am not asking you to change your political position, nor am I asking you to leave. What I am asking you to do is to stop unilaterally making edits which several other longtime editors find objectionable and utilize the talk pages to come to a consensus first. -Loren 04:54, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

(To Nationalist) I concur this. It is getting rather annoying. You've already been blocked from editting twice. Why can't you discuss these changes somewhere without going against concensus? --Borgarde 02:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

• As do I, your tendentious editing and repetitive attempts to insert or delete content which are resisted by multiple editors is disruptive and displays poor wiki-etiquette - which has resulted in you being blocked twice already. You've displayed a easily rocognizable pattern of edits displaying a bias, and repeated biased edits to a single article or group of articles which is unwelcome on this encyclopedia. This last behaviour is generally characterised as POV pushing and is a common cause of blocking. It is usually an indication of strong opinions - which is in direct defiance of an official policy on the English Misplaced Pages which states that "all Misplaced Pages articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), representing fairly and without bias all significant views that have been published by a reliable source." Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view, is one of Misplaced Pages's three content policies. The other two are Misplaced Pages:Verifiability and Misplaced Pages:No original research. Jointly, these policies determine the type and quality of material that is acceptable in the main namespace. In future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future, instead of edit warring and do not add content without citing reliable sources. Thanks. Yankees76 04:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

I figured that you are a newcomer, so you should really follow the rules. Stop editing without discussing first. If you can't stop being annoying, you'll probably get blocked again.--Jerrypp772000 22:30, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Not Assuming Good Faith

Regarding this edit. Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.Yankees76 03:50, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding this edit. Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you.Yankees76 03:53, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

With regards to your edits summary in this edit. Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Please stop being uncivil to your fellow editors and assume that they are here to improve Misplaced Pages. Thank you.Yankees76 03:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

In regard to your personal attack in the following edit summary. . This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Yankees76 03:57, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Stop saying things that aren't true about me. I have never said anything about being a Taiwan independence supporter. I've been trying to resolve the problem peacefully w/ you, but unfortunately, you don't seem to read what I'm telling you! Please read, Thank you.--Jerrypp772000 21:30, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding this edit summary: Please, assume good faith, I know I should not say this myself. But I can't stand it anymore! Stop saying things that aren't true about me! I've discussed peacefully so many times with you. In Talk:Guantian, Tainan, Talk:Rende, Tainan, and on this page. Please read those, and stop being stubborn.--Jerrypp772000 00:01, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding this edit calling another user a "hypocrite" [http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Jiali&diff=prev&oldid=103763877 ] This is your only warning. The next time you make an personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. 07:26, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

This is going to be my (or our) last straw

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your recent disruptive behavior. If you insist on staying stubborn with your own viewpoint and presuming all other perspectives from other editors to be completely wrong, I will file an RfC report on your disruptive behavior and attitude toward others, including assuming bad faith, refuse to resolve dispute in a peaceful way, and edit warring especially after two blocks on three-revert-rule violation. I suggest you to start open your mind and consider other viewpoints before making any more controversial/disputable edits. Thank you. Vic226_(chat) 04:49, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

hi

I don't even want to argue about putting ROC as birth place for that baseball player, seeing the sort of inane yet persistent arguments we're getting. I think Jiang said that there's some manual of style for this kind of stuff so we'd better follow it. But yeah, putting Chen Shui-bian as president of Taiwan is defnintely wrong, and I think that's already against the general consensus about politics in taiwan so we shouldn't worry too much about it, since in this instance it's the other guy that's the troll, not you. BlueShirts 04:18, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours due to making personal attacks against Wikipedians and edit warring. My advice is that you take some time off, then you can resume editing Misplaced Pages calmly and peacefully. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. —Signed, your friendly neighborhood MessedRocker. 07:34, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

I do not think it is fair that I was blocked for 24 hrs

Nationalist (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didnt do anything wrong and some guy just came along to block me. Apparently, I was framed by a group of people who are ganging up against me including vicc and jerry. It is strange that I was blocked for 24 hrs for doing nothing, while Jerry was blocked for only 8 hours because he had violated the 3RRR rule. I respectfully request to be unblocked please. Thank you.-Nationalist 20:06, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The block was appropriate for comments such as this one; please take Messedrocker's advice above. -- Sandstein 21:29, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm sorry, but there is no such thing as "I was framed by others into being blocked" excuse. After all, it was completely your own choice to be extremely aggressive on the Republic-of-China changes when you came. In fact, you should be the one to discuss (i.e. propose a discussion) about this controversial editing issue, not us. You cannot just make your own change permanent by reverting others' reverts on it and tell them to discuss futilely with your stubborn attitude (see WP:DICK); after all, the original version was not yours. The "please discuss before making changes" phrase is used for proposing new changes, not protecting them. Edit warring will only make the matter worse, and you cannot just blame us for it when you were the one instigating it.

And from that, I don't think you have really learned to consider in other people's perspectives yet. For the matter of fact, what you called the "cold hard fact" is only politically correct, and that does not belong to some of the articles that you have been contributing in. I am also wondering if you have anything to say about my argument in Chien-Ming Wang's talk page. Vic226_(chat) 22:20, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Hey, Nationalist, I should be the victim, you called me a hypocrite! And Vic is right, you really should consider in other people's POV.--Jerrypp772000 22:28, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing Misplaced Pages for a period of 72 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Cbrown1023 talk 00:25, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/Nationalist (2nd) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vic226 (talk • contribs) 03:38, 31 January 2007 (UTC).

Senkaku Islands

Misplaced Pages has clear procedures on moving pages. Other than in exceptional circumstances all pages should be moved by following the instructions on the Requested Moves page. Unilateral moves can trigger edit wars, break links and cause a lot of problems. Please stop unilaterally moving pages, as you did with Senkaku Islands, and follow the correct procedure. --Kusunose 06:26, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

OmniMedia

A tag has been placed on OmniMedia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Misplaced Pages. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Philippe Beaudette 05:49, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Omni-Media

A tag has been placed on OmniMedia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done because the article is a repost of either already posted material, or of material that was previously deleted in a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how OmniMedia is different from all other articles, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:OmniMedia saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Misplaced Pages, and we ask you to follow these instructions. Frickeg 05:59, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on OmniMedia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Misplaced Pages:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to add more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Frickeg 07:32, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

The article OmniMedia has been speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Frickeg 07:32, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Personal attack/Assuming bad faith

Regarding this edit, Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. Vic226_(chat) 23:43, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Regarding this edit:

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you will be blocked for disruption. Vic226_(chat) 01:49, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Stop screwing up United States passport

Stop removing the clarification "(Taiwan)" from the article. Many English speakers don't recognize Taiwan by the name "Republic of China," and the name "Taiwan" is needed for clarification. Having the correct name first with Taiwan in parentheses after it is the best compromise between using the correct name and being useful to the people who actually read the article. --Tkynerd 00:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Taiwan

Can you please stop removing (Taiwan) from articles. You don't understand because you are not from an English speaking country, but in the English speaking world not everyone understands the political status between the Chinas. This is the English speaking Misplaced Pages and Taiwan should be included. Stop using Misplaced Pages to push your point of view. --Borgarde 02:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Even the Chinese version says 台灣台南市, etc.--Jerrypp772000 02:23, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Well then you may be from the English speaking world, but you also have a lot more background on the Taiwan situation than the average English speaking person. I went out the other day and asked a handful of my friends and fellow classmates, and none of them knew the exact situation between the ROC and PRC. People can identify Taiwan, people can identify China as mainland China. People see "Republic of China" and they assume PRC. If you leave it as "Republic of China (Taiwan)" people will straight away realise what China you are talking about. You just need to understand that you know the situation, where the majority of people do not. Please stop removing Taiwan, you are only making it more difficult to comprehend. --Borgarde 02:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Requests for Comment

Your recent behavior has been filed to Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Nationalist for inputs of outside view. Please remember that I filed this only after you decided to continue making personal attacks. Vic226_(chat) 02:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)