| Revision as of 01:47, 30 December 2021 editMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,138,451 edits →RFA 2021 Completed: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:33, 30 December 2021 edit undoCrouch, Swale (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users105,220 edits →Restrictions: suggestionsNext edit → | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| For my appeal in the New Year would you support swapping the 1 article a week through AFC with 1 article a month without AFC? That would mean I would only be able to create 12 articles a year instead of 52 but would mean I would be able to create them myself without using AFC. You stated at the last appeal that you would be OK with allowing me to create 1 article a week without AFC. We should probably also look at if I can create a set number of articles for the ] and be able to appeal in 6 months instead of a year if possible. ''']''' (]) 21:43, 28 December 2021 (UTC) | For my appeal in the New Year would you support swapping the 1 article a week through AFC with 1 article a month without AFC? That would mean I would only be able to create 12 articles a year instead of 52 but would mean I would be able to create them myself without using AFC. You stated at the last appeal that you would be OK with allowing me to create 1 article a week without AFC. We should probably also look at if I can create a set number of articles for the ] and be able to appeal in 6 months instead of a year if possible. ''']''' (]) 21:43, 28 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
| :Things: | |||
| * Article creation (general) as I've said 1 a month (without AFC) should be enough for now. | |||
| * Articles creation (parishes) should be as many as reasonably possible, without AFC. | |||
| * DABs and redirects, as well as some at ] being redirects needed and this is sometimes needed after page moves and when using DisamAssist but wouldn't be happy with having to use ] and a throttle limit would be a pain so I'd say all or nothing here. | |||
| * Moves, as already said I can make as many ] and ] as I want so removing this isn't important. I wouldn't be happy with a throttle limit here either but a ] or 0RR would be OK. | |||
| * Appeal, after 6 months to see if (in particular) the 2nd (and possibly 1st perhaps if a different topic is specified). | |||
| :Which of these would you support? ''']''' (]) 17:33, 30 December 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == RFA 2021 Completed == | == RFA 2021 Completed == | ||
Revision as of 17:33, 30 December 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User | Talk | Articles | To Do | Toolbox | Subpages | DYK | Awards |
 Archives |
| Index |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Welcome to my talk page. Leave me a message!
I am probably offline and am unable to respond swiftly. I will respond as soon as I can. Please feel free to send me an email, where I will likely respond faster.
 | This user is stalked by friendly talk page staplers. |  |
|
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. TheSandDoctor 06:51, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
|
Happy Holidays |
| Happy holidays WTT, and happy new year! DirkJandeGeer (щи) 00:11, 25 December 2021 (UTC) |
Happy Christmas, WTT!
Hi WTT, I hope that you have a very Happy Christmas! Thank you for everything that you do for the project. From my family to yours, wishing you a very Happy Christmas and a wonderful New Year.
.jpg)
.jpg)
Hello Worm That Turned: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Misplaced Pages. Cheers, TheSandDoctor 04:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
,_cropped.jpg)
Happy Holidays!
Huggums537 (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Huggums537 (talk) 14:56, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Restrictions
For my appeal in the New Year would you support swapping the 1 article a week through AFC with 1 article a month without AFC? That would mean I would only be able to create 12 articles a year instead of 52 but would mean I would be able to create them myself without using AFC. You stated at the last appeal that you would be OK with allowing me to create 1 article a week without AFC. We should probably also look at if I can create a set number of articles for the parishes project and be able to appeal in 6 months instead of a year if possible. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:43, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
- Things:
- Article creation (general) as I've said 1 a month (without AFC) should be enough for now.
- Articles creation (parishes) should be as many as reasonably possible, without AFC.
- DABs and redirects, as well as some at User:Crouch, Swale/Civil parishes being redirects needed and this is sometimes needed after page moves and when using DisamAssist but wouldn't be happy with having to use WP:AFC/R and a throttle limit would be a pain so I'd say all or nothing here.
- Moves, as already said I can make as many WP:RMT and WP:RM#CM as I want so removing this isn't important. I wouldn't be happy with a throttle limit here either but a WP:1RR or 0RR would be OK.
- Appeal, after 6 months to see if (in particular) the 2nd (and possibly 1st perhaps if a different topic is specified).
- Which of these would you support? Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:33, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
RFA 2021 Completed
The 2021 re-examination of RFA has been completed. 23 (plus 2 variants) ideas were proposed. Over 200 editors participated in this final phase. Three changes gained consensus and two proposals were identified by the closers as having the potential to gain consensus with some further discussion and iteration. Thanks to all who helped to close the discussion, and in particular Primefac, Lee Vilenski, and Ymblanter for closing the most difficult conversations and for TonyBallioni for closing the review of one of the closes.
The following proposals gained consensus and have all been implemented:
- Revision of standard question 1 to
Why are you interested in becoming an administrator?
Special thanks to xaosflux for help with implementation. - A new process, Administrative Action Review (XRV) designed to review if an editor's specific use of an advanced permission, including the admin tools, is consistent with policy in a process similar to that of deletion review and move review. Thanks to all the editors who contributed (and are continuing to contribute) to the discussion of how to implement this proposal.
- Removal of autopatrol from the administrator's toolkit. Special thanks to Wugapodes and Seddon for their help with implementation.
The following proposals were identified by the closers as having the potential to gain consensus with some further discussion and iteration:
- An option for people to run for temporary adminship (proposal, discussion, & close)
- An optional election process (proposal & discussion and close review & re-close)
Editors who wish to discuss these ideas or other ideas on how to try to address any of the six issues identified during phase 1 for which no proposal gained are encouraged to do so at RFA's talk page or an appropriate village pump.
A final and huge thanks all those who participated in this effort to improve our RFA process over the last 4 months.
This is the final update with no further talk page messages planned.
01:47, 30 December 2021 (UTC)