| Revision as of 07:21, 11 December 2021 editNovem Linguae (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Interface administrators, Administrators51,264 edits Undid revision 1059731353 by Novem Linguae (talk) - twinkle test. self revert.Tag: Undo← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:21, 12 January 2022 edit undoGeneralrelative (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,224 edits →January 2022: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| ::You are continuing to edit war at ]. Despite my request to start a discussion on the talk page if necessary you have restored this disputed content three times today after having initially attempted to add it on 13 November . Please be advised that reverting again will mean that you have crossed the 3RR red line. ] (]) 06:58, 7 December 2021 (UTC) | ::You are continuing to edit war at ]. Despite my request to start a discussion on the talk page if necessary you have restored this disputed content three times today after having initially attempted to add it on 13 November . Please be advised that reverting again will mean that you have crossed the 3RR red line. ] (]) 06:58, 7 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
| == January 2022 == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ], rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. | |||
| Points to note: | |||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;''' | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.''' <!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] (]) 17:21, 12 January 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:21, 12 January 2022
Welcome!
Hi Buffalo8! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Schazjmd (talk) 18:08, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
My concern about your edits.
I went to An American Tail: The Treasure of Manhattan Island and I’ve noticed you deleted some reasonable information. I’ve viewed the end of the film as some elements on Native Americans were researched from Stockbridge Munsee Community and you think it’s not true the way you deleted it as describing them grammatical error. Is there anything you don’t want anyone to know about the film’s background? Retrosunshine2006 talk 18:24, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Buffalo8, it's helpful to add edit summaries and thank you for doing so, but please do not put misleading edit summaries. Most of your edit summaries inaccurately refer to grammatical errors. Please use more appropriate summaries to describe your edits, thanks. Schazjmd (talk) 18:57, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Please don't claim to correct "grammatical errors" when you change the content/meaning of a statement. That's misleading (WP:SUMMARYNO). –Austronesier (talk) 13:29, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
December 2021
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Intelligence quotient. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Generalrelative (talk) 04:49, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- I have also noticed that your edits here go far beyond correcting a grammatical error, which is what your edit summary claims. I see that you've been warned for this exact behavior by Austronesier in the past. This type of things is easy to forgive if it only happens once or twice, but if it persists in the face of warnings, and indeed if it goes along with other disruptive behavior like edit warring, it will likely lead to loss of editing privileges eventually. Generalrelative (talk) 04:59, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- You are continuing to edit war at Intelligence quotient. Despite my request to start a discussion on the talk page if necessary you have restored this disputed content three times today after having initially attempted to add it on 13 November . Please be advised that reverting again will mean that you have crossed the 3RR red line. Generalrelative (talk) 06:58, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
January 2022
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Intelligence quotient. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Generalrelative (talk) 17:21, 12 January 2022 (UTC)