Revision as of 22:52, 14 January 2022 editEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,224 edits →User:178.155.64.69 reported by User:Slatersteven (Result: Semi): Closing← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:24, 14 January 2022 edit undoEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,224 edits →User:Тимур Азадов reported by User:Llammakey (Result: Blocked): ClosingNext edit → | ||
Line 280: | Line 280: | ||
*{{AN3|s}}. The user's series of consecutive edits occurred on December 20! ] (]) 03:21, 14 January 2022 (UTC) | *{{AN3|s}}. The user's series of consecutive edits occurred on December 20! ] (]) 03:21, 14 January 2022 (UTC) | ||
== ] reported by ] (Result: ) == | == ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked) == | ||
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Montreal Campaign}} | '''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Montreal Campaign}} | ||
Line 302: | Line 302: | ||
This keeps popping up on my watchlist. Eastfarthington keeps telling them to take it to the talk page. They refuse. ] (]) 12:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC) | This keeps popping up on my watchlist. Eastfarthington keeps telling them to take it to the talk page. They refuse. ] (]) 12:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC) | ||
:{{AN3|b}} – 24 hours for edit warring, for removing references, and for their promise to 'keep reverting your changes'. This looks to be a new account that was created for warring on the ]. But the point they are trying to make about the size of the French forces probably needs to be looked at. ] (]) 23:23, 14 January 2022 (UTC) | |||
== ] reported by ] (Result: Both Unbh and Geysirhead blocked for 72 hours) == | == ] reported by ] (Result: Both Unbh and Geysirhead blocked for 72 hours) == |
Revision as of 23:24, 14 January 2022
Noticeboard for edit warring
Noticeboards | |
---|---|
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
General | |
Articles, content | |
Page handling | |
User conduct | |
Other | |
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards |
This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.
- See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
- If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.
You must notify any user you have reported.
You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~
to do so.
You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
- Additional notes
- When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
- The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
- Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
- Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.
- Definition of edit warring
- Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)
Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs. |
Administrators' (archives, search) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
349 | 350 | 351 | 352 | 353 | 354 | 355 | 356 | 357 | 358 |
359 | 360 | 361 | 362 | 363 | 364 | 365 | 366 | 367 | 368 |
Incidents (archives, search) | |||||||||
1156 | 1157 | 1158 | 1159 | 1160 | 1161 | 1162 | 1163 | 1164 | 1165 |
1166 | 1167 | 1168 | 1169 | 1170 | 1171 | 1172 | 1173 | 1174 | 1175 |
Edit-warring/3RR (archives, search) | |||||||||
472 | 473 | 474 | 475 | 476 | 477 | 478 | 479 | 480 | 481 |
482 | 483 | 484 | 485 | 486 | 487 | 488 | 489 | 490 | 491 |
Arbitration enforcement (archives) | |||||||||
327 | 328 | 329 | 330 | 331 | 332 | 333 | 334 | 335 | 336 |
337 | 338 | 339 | 340 | 341 | 342 | 343 | 344 | 345 | 346 |
Other links | |||||||||
User: 110.137.195.235 reported by User:The Bangsawan (Result: Blocked)
Page: Kota Kinabalu International Airport (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported:110.137.195.235 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Comments:
There is a severe edit warring from a non-registered user in the Kota Kinabalu International Airport page. Parts of the page was being blanketed by the user without providing any justification. Several users have tried to resolve the matter and even highlighted the issue on the non-registered user page. However both of the notice were ignored by this user. The record on the removal can be seen on the history tab of Kota Kinabalu International Airport-د بڠساون (talk) 06:08, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Blocked – 12 hours for vandalism by User:TheresNoTime. EdJohnston (talk) 16:55, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
User:61.247.41.175 reported by User:The Bangsawan (Result: Semi)
Page: Kota Kinabalu International Airport (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported:61.247.41.175 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Comments:
Based on the timeline (as both non-registered ip addressed flip-flop their accounts on the blanking the page of Kota Kinabalu International Airport almost simultaneously, and as-per ip address lookout between the two address location located in the same area, we can deduce that the latter account is a sockpuppet of the former.--د بڠساون (talk) 06:54, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Result: Page semiprotected one week by User:RegentsPark. EdJohnston (talk) 16:59, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
User:Aydin.mirz reported by User:Curb Safe Charmer (Result: Blocked)
Page: Digital transformation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Aydin.mirz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Their rationale for their revert is that they want their version of the page left up 'to get a grade'.
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:
Comments:
- Blocked as WP:NOTHERE.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:14, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
User:Buffalo8 reported by User:Firefangledfeathers (Result: Partially Blocked 1 week)
Page: Intelligence quotient (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Buffalo8 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 18:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC) "/* Sex */ Added clarification"
- 18:33, 12 January 2022 (UTC) ""
- 17:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC) ""
- More similar edits dating back to last October
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: User:Generalrelative opened ] to discuss Buffalo8's edits, and pinged them. They have not engaged in any discussion.
Comments: Edit warring since October despite multiple warnings and an invitation to discuss rather than revert. Firefangledfeathers 18:43, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Blocked – for a period of 1 week Partial block on Intelligence quotient EvergreenFir (talk) 18:44, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
User:74.15.131.143 reported by User:M.Bitton (Result: Blocked)
Page: First Barbary War (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 74.15.131.143 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 00:18, 13 January 2022 (UTC) ""
- Consecutive edits made from 21:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC) to 21:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- 21:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC) "its not irrelevant , Algerine troops sent 12+ ships to back of Tripoli in the first barbary war which led to the second one"
- 21:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1065277348 by M.Bitton (talk)"
- 18:28, 12 January 2022 (UTC) "the picture is literally american captain paying tributes to the dey of Algiers the picture is preserved in washington during the first barbary war stop with your propaganda even in casualities you can see ALGERIA: NONE meaning we participated"
- 01:29, 12 January 2022 (UTC) "the picture is about the american captain paying tribute to Algiers after the first barbary war you idiot"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
- 22:18, 12 January 2022 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on First Barbary War."
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
Apart from their personal attack (see the idiot remark in their edit summary), they are also edit warring on Algiers expedition (1541) (removing sourced content and describing any attempt at restoring it as "vandalism" and "propaganda"). The invitation to join the discussion has been ignored. M.Bitton (talk) 00:34, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: The addition of factual inaccuracies to other articles continues (left as is until something is done about the IP's behaviour). M.Bitton (talk) 14:03, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Blocked – 48 hours for edit warring. EdJohnston (talk) 17:55, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
User:68.42.245.120 reported by User:Generalrelative (Result: blocked for three months)
Page: New Century Foundation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 68.42.245.120 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:
Comments: Similar behavior over the same period at American Renaissance (magazine). See these reverts over the past hour:
Original: Attempt to resolve dispute:
Generalrelative (talk) 05:13, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Blocked – for a period of 3 months Even ignoring the question of edit-warring, a block is warranted for persistent disruptive editing to try to impose a point of view. The disruptive editing started in November 2021, but has only now started to be done on a large scale.JBW (talk) 10:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
User:David xmz reported by User:LVTW2 (Result: )
Page: List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: David xmz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 05:02, 13 January 2022 (UTC) Undid revision 1065360442 by LVTW2 (talk)"
- 04:12, 13 January 2022 (UTC) Undid revision 1065204492 by LVTW2 (talk)"
- 06:26, 12 January 2022 (UTC) Undid revision 1065169600 by EvergreenFir (talk)"
- 03:48, 12 January 2022 (UTC) Undid revision 1065096450 by LVTW2 (talk)"
- 10:58, 11 January 2022 (UTC) Undid revision 1065204492 by LVTW2 (talk)"
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:
04:47, 13 January 2022 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita." Warning issued by LVTW2
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: 11:20, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Comments:
User is currently engaged in an edit war on thr List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita
User:103.5.134.36 reported by User:Anjuvannam (Result: Semi)
Page: St. Mary's Jacobite Soonoro Cathedral, Angamaly (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 103.5.134.36 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:
Comments: Continuous removal of sourced information and references
12:40, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Result: Page semiprotected one month due to edit warring. There seem to be many disputes about the Malankara churches. EdJohnston (talk) 22:45, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
User:178.155.64.69 reported by User:Slatersteven (Result: Semi)
Page: Crimean War (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 178.155.64.69 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:
Comments:
They have been reverted by two users, asked to make a case and there may be wp:coi issues.Slatersteven (talk) 13:42, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- See Talk:Crimean War#Quotes cleanup regarding the mess this editor (using various IPs) has made of the article by their constant addition of unattributed quotes within the text, something they were told about back in December yet are still doing with their current edits. FDW777 (talk) 13:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Yep huge WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT issues.Slatersteven (talk) 14:16, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Just to add to this discussion to this edit war, as someone uninvolved with WikiProject military history or this article, I previously witnessed this editor making questionable edits to Crimean War. Personally, I found his edits to be POV pushing and his persistency in not attributing quotes problematic already, but it's clear to me now that this editor is simply not here to contribute to the project with respect for the work of others or for our readers. Pilaz (talk) 14:40, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Part of the problem may be (or it is just a convenient excuse) they are Russian and thus seem to have issues with understanding English. They seem (for example) to not understand what prose means (AGF, which is getting harder). Even with the AGF they are still a time sink.Slatersteven (talk) 14:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- I find it difficult to believe an editor who can write a talk page post such as this has any difficulty understanding English. FDW777 (talk) 16:04, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Result: Page semiprotected three months due to disruptive editing, including unsourced changes. EdJohnston (talk) 22:51, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
User:Nunuxxx reported by User:217.149.166.67 (Result: Filer blocked for evasion)
Page: Elisabethpol Governorate (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Nunuxxx (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:
Comments: User speaks about non existent consensus: regarding azeri name on Russian Empire governorate in modern Armenia and Azerbaijan. reverts without saying why.217.149.166.67 (talk) 14:36, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- 4 differences have been cited however, the 2nd of the 4 is not a revert, therefore I have not broken 3RR. It should also be noted the user opened the discussion 6 minutes before the report was posted, and that no revert was done after the opening of the discussion. Nunuxxx (talk) 14:47, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Result: The filing IP is blocked two months for evasion. I'm taking their removal of someone else's comment from my talk page that the claim of evasion is likely true. The original IP 217.149.166.11 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) was conducting a lengthy war across different articles within the WP:AA2 topic. The two IPs both come from the range Special:Contributions/217.149.166.0/24. EdJohnston (talk) 18:40, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
User:GIFTASEAN reported by User:Someone97816 (Result: Stale)
Page: Chandran Nair (businessman) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: GIFTASEAN (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:
Comments: User GIFTASEAN basically removed all the negative/controversial parts in the biography and then put up a tons of informations about the subject's publications, which he elaborated in detail. It looks like an advertisement and whitewashing, especially considering User GIFTASEAN only edited this page and nothing else. Someone97816 (talk) 03:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Stale. The user's series of consecutive edits occurred on December 20! Bbb23 (talk) 03:21, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
User:Тимур Азадов reported by User:Llammakey (Result: Blocked)
Page: Montreal Campaign (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Тимур Азадов (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 08:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1065419935 by Eastfarthingan (talk) You are presenting factually wrong and misleading information of forces actually engaged in the campaign. The inclusion of 20000 men strong local civilian population "able to bear arms" without any evidence of their involvement in the conflict in the "Strength" section is egregious. Stop edit warring and present sources proving active Canadian insurgency against the invaders."
- 07:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1065303936 by Eastfarthingan (talk) Please learn the difference between "forces at disposal" as stated in the source and "forces engaged in the campaign". The article makes it look as if the French had 23200 troops and the British only 18200, which implies the French had numerical superiority. Although the article reeks of British bias, that statement is beyond ridiculous and refuted by all respected historians."
- 17:18, 12 January 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1065242245 by Eastfarthingan (talk) I will keep reverting your changes unless you provide a reliable source stating that the totality of 20,000 inhabitants of the region did participate in the campaign with arms drawn and were offering active resistance to the British during the campaign, otherwise their presence in "Strength" is not justified."
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
This keeps popping up on my watchlist. Eastfarthington keeps telling them to take it to the talk page. They refuse. Llammakey (talk) 12:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Blocked – 24 hours for edit warring, for removing references, and for their promise to 'keep reverting your changes'. This looks to be a new account that was created for warring on the Montreal Campaign. But the point they are trying to make about the size of the French forces probably needs to be looked at. EdJohnston (talk) 23:23, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
User:Unbh reported by User:Zippybonzo (Result: Both Unbh and Geysirhead blocked for 72 hours)
Page: Warm Showers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Unbh (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 17:40, 14 January 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1065658033 by Geysirhead (talk) read WP:OWN please"
- 17:06, 14 January 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1065654428 by Zippybonzo (talk) all my edits have explanations. removal of non notable list of names which are not properly sourced and general clean up of the article. Look at what you're restoring please."
- 17:02, 14 January 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1065649953 by Geysirhead (talk)"
- 16:35, 14 January 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1065640336 by Geysirhead (talk) RV. All not notable"
- 15:35, 14 January 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1065637339 by Geysirhead (talk)"
- 15:33, 14 January 2022 (UTC) "Reverted 1 edit by Geysirhead (talk) to last revision by Unbh"
- 15:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC) "Reverted 2 edits by Geysirhead (talk) to last revision by Unbh"
- 15:27, 14 January 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1065636353 by Geysirhead (talk) still not notable"
- 15:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1065636135 by Geysirhead (talk)Not notable."
- 15:23, 14 January 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1065634625 by Geysirhead (talk)being listed on a tax return does not make something notable to be included in an article."
- 15:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1065634337 by Geysirhead (talk) The IRS is not a reliable source to establish notability."
- 15:09, 14 January 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1065634006 by Geysirhead (talk)"
- 15:09, 14 January 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1065633832 by Geysirhead (talk)RVV"
- 15:07, 14 January 2022 (UTC) "Reverted 1 edit by Geysirhead (talk) to last revision by Unbh"
- 15:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1065632874 by Geysirhead (talk) removing non notable information without reliable 3rd party sources,"
- 15:00, 14 January 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1065632531 by Geysirhead (talk) material without RS should not be there."
- 14:57, 14 January 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1065632041 by Geysirhead (talk) still not notable, and the IRS is not a RS. being listed in a tax return does not establish notability."
- 14:53, 14 January 2022 (UTC) "Undid revision 1065631601 by Geysirhead (talk) not notable or reliably sourced. discuss on talk before restoring."
- 14:50, 14 January 2022 (UTC) "Reverted good faith edits by Geysirhead (talk): None of this is notable or reliably sourced"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
- 15:46, 14 January 2022 (UTC) "Warning: Potential three-revert rule violation see also uw-ew (RW 16.1)"
- 17:59, 14 January 2022 (UTC) "Notice: Edit warring stronger wording (RW 16.1)"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
- 17:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC) on User talk:Zippybonzo "/* Warm showers. */ Reply"
Comments:
This is the most edit warring that they have been involved in. I am almost certain that Geysirhead was also violating 3RR. Zippy (talk) 18:06, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Geysirhead went through and reverted everything I edited across multiple articles, including Justus of Jerusalem for goodness sake, which is pure stalking. they screated my userpage repeatedly, and keeps restoring their talk page edits even after i've acknowledged I've read them. they're adding swathes of poorly sourced information that doesn't meet any sort of notability, and reverting any edits on the page they feels they own.Unbh (talk) 18:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Unbh I agree with you on the stalking but you still violated 3RR whether the source was reliable or not. Zippy (talk) 18:17, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- For the record—the disruption isn't obvious to non-admins as I've deleted the pages in question—Geysirhead is also harassing Unbh by repeatedly creating a page in Unbh's userspace. I've just in the last few minutes issued a formal warning about this, as I can't think of any conceivable AGF explanation. ‑ Iridescent 18:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Fully protected for 3 days. Both Unbh and Geysirhead have violated 3RR. Both users are warned that if they resume edit-warring after protection has expired, they may be blocked without notice. In addition, the dispute should be resolved on the article Talk page, and it must be done civilly. Personal attacks may also be met with blocks.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:25, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- The users have violated 3RR on a few other pages as well. Zippy (talk) 18:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Bbb23 they also violated on BeWelcome, Hospitality Club and CouchSurfing Zippy (talk) 18:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- I don't propose protecting all the pages on which they're in conflict. If they're not willing to follow our rules, they should just be ejected; it's not reasonable doing a mass-protection and disrupting the workflows of other editors on their account. ‑ Iridescent 18:29, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- I thought that too. Zippy (talk) 18:29, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- I don't propose protecting all the pages on which they're in conflict. If they're not willing to follow our rules, they should just be ejected; it's not reasonable doing a mass-protection and disrupting the workflows of other editors on their account. ‑ Iridescent 18:29, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Bbb23 they also violated on BeWelcome, Hospitality Club and CouchSurfing Zippy (talk) 18:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- The users have violated 3RR on a few other pages as well. Zippy (talk) 18:26, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- I wish I'd known about the other violations earlier. I've blocked both users for 72 hours for edit-warring across multiple articles. I've also lifted the protection on Warm Showers.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:40, 14 January 2022 (UTC)