| Revision as of 08:46, 26 January 2022 editJéské Couriano (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers40,143 edits Re← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:02, 26 January 2022 edit undoAmoeba69th (talk | contribs)189 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| ::* as you mentioned, you don't talk Indonesian ... so I find it outstanding for you to analyze google researches in Indonesian language, in less than few minutes to assest 90% of the google search articles in indonesian regarding the matter are not relevant and do not prove notability... wondering if you have any magic forces to drive your amazing intuition! <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 08:03, 26 January 2022 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ::* as you mentioned, you don't talk Indonesian ... so I find it outstanding for you to analyze google researches in Indonesian language, in less than few minutes to assest 90% of the google search articles in indonesian regarding the matter are not relevant and do not prove notability... wondering if you have any magic forces to drive your amazing intuition! <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 08:03, 26 January 2022 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| :::* The very nature of Google (and Internet search engines as a whole) means that it will pull literally ''everything'' that seems to be somewhat relevant and put it into the search results, hence my blanket statement about Google searches. The 95% figure is from over a decade of experience editing Misplaced Pages and looking for sources for various topics, and I see no reason why the Indonesian-language Google search would be any different from the English-language one. —] ] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 08:46, 26 January 2022 (UTC) | :::* The very nature of Google (and Internet search engines as a whole) means that it will pull literally ''everything'' that seems to be somewhat relevant and put it into the search results, hence my blanket statement about Google searches. The 95% figure is from over a decade of experience editing Misplaced Pages and looking for sources for various topics, and I see no reason why the Indonesian-language Google search would be any different from the English-language one. —] ] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 08:46, 26 January 2022 (UTC) | ||
| :::* Maybe because you are not Indonesian? so to me, your hypothesis that 95% of the entire google engine articles regarding a topic are just trashy gossip is just an understatement which sounds to me as someone that has YES, has an incredible amount of years of experience in working in Misplaced Pages and congratulations for that, but also assuming to know more than they do about a particular topic? and using their own judgment, despite actual facts that lacks of actual fundamental proof which could simply come from researching a bit deeper in a big cultural aspects of an entire nation cultural artifacts in movies and entertainment ? https://en.wikipedia.org/21_Cineplex - https://21cineplex.com/slowmotion/sarah-azhari-kebagian-peran-dadakan,364.htm. | |||
Revision as of 09:02, 26 January 2022
Sarah Azhari
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Sarah Azhari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NMUSICIAN / WP:NACTOR. Noting IMDb is not an acceptable source. Dan arndt (talk) 04:07, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 04:07, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 04:07, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 04:07, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 04:07, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 05:01, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 05:01, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: this article mentions little aside from controversies she's involved in. I don't think this follows WP:BLP/WP:UNDUE policies and I didn't turn up anything (in English) that could help balance it. -- asilvering (talk) 05:09, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: For the very same reasons given by asilvering. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 05:28, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - I'm really not finding much in a Google search that would help (string: "Sarah azhari"). I don't know Indonesian, but it's not hard to suss out the loanwords "Foto" and "Gossip", and what few sources I've turned Google Translate on are scandal-raggy in tone. —A little blue Bori v^_^v 05:31, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - When researching Sarah Azhari on Google Indonesia articles about her are found and her works are found on every possible big platform, press and even mentioned in books. Who really knows about Indonesia knows of Sarah Azhari and the Azhari family works in both movies, sitcom and music that are nonetheless a great part of history in Indonesian culture and society. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amoeba69th (talk • contribs) 06:48, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- 95% of all links Google pulls up are not acceptable sources, and as she is still a living person merely claiming those sources exist is not enough. They must be provided directly. —A little blue Bori v^_^v 06:54, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- as you mentioned, you don't talk Indonesian ... so I find it outstanding for you to analyze google researches in Indonesian language, in less than few minutes to assest 90% of the google search articles in indonesian regarding the matter are not relevant and do not prove notability... wondering if you have any magic forces to drive your amazing intuition! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amoeba69th (talk • contribs) 08:03, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- The very nature of Google (and Internet search engines as a whole) means that it will pull literally everything that seems to be somewhat relevant and put it into the search results, hence my blanket statement about Google searches. The 95% figure is from over a decade of experience editing Misplaced Pages and looking for sources for various topics, and I see no reason why the Indonesian-language Google search would be any different from the English-language one. —A little blue Bori v^_^v 08:46, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Maybe because you are not Indonesian? so to me, your hypothesis that 95% of the entire google engine articles regarding a topic are just trashy gossip is just an understatement which sounds to me as someone that has YES, has an incredible amount of years of experience in working in Misplaced Pages and congratulations for that, but also assuming to know more than they do about a particular topic? and using their own judgment, despite actual facts that lacks of actual fundamental proof which could simply come from researching a bit deeper in a big cultural aspects of an entire nation cultural artifacts in movies and entertainment ? https://en.wikipedia.org/21_Cineplex - https://21cineplex.com/slowmotion/sarah-azhari-kebagian-peran-dadakan,364.htm.