Misplaced Pages

War on Want: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:18, 7 February 2007 edit194.80.32.9 (talk) Praise and criticism of activities← Previous edit Revision as of 16:15, 9 February 2007 edit undoEvelyn727 (talk | contribs)59 edits deleted misleading languageNext edit →
Line 24: Line 24:


==Praise and criticism of activities== ==Praise and criticism of activities==
War On Want has been accused of making political use of "Holocaust and anti-Semitic themes"<ref>{{cite web|date=] |url=http://www.ngo-monitor.org/article/war_on_want_wow_continues_to_use_anti_semitic_imagery_in_its_criticism_of_israel_ |title=War on Want (WoW) continues to use anti-Semitic imagery in its criticism of Israel |publisher=] |accessdate=2007-02-07}}</ref> in its campaign material. One example of this was War on Want's Christmas Cards for 2006, which sought to connect the suffering of Jesus to that of the Palestinians. Conservative Israeli group ] has accused <ref>{{cite web|date=] |url=http://www.ngo-monitor.org/article/war_on_want_wages_war_on_israel_update_ |title=War on Want Wages War on Israel (Update) |publisher=] |accessdate=2007-02-07}}</ref>War On Want of being “involved in international lobbying to isolate Israel" in its campaign material. One example of this was War on Want's Christmas Cards for 2006, which sought to connect the suffering of Jesus to that of the Palestinians.


Author and Middle East commentator Dr Denis MacEoin wrote to both War on Want and the Charities Commission about the Chrismas cards. He noted the lack of context and War on Wants political agenda which he says is one sides and seeks to "condemn Israel while lending support to a notorious terrorist organization" <ref>{{cite web|date=] |url=http://mid-eastplus.blogspot.com/2006/12/new-christmas-myth.html |title=The new Christmas myth |publisher=Dr Denis MacEoin |accessdate=2007-02-07}}</ref>. The Christmas card incident also attracted comment from British journalist Tom Gross who stated that War on Want was a "charity that goes to extraordinary length to demonise Israel" <ref>{{cite web|date=] |url=http://www.tomgrossmedia.com/mideastdispatches/archives/000819.html |title=War on Want wages War on Israel |publisher=] |accessdate=2007-02-07}}</ref>. Author and Middle East commentator Dr Denis MacEoin wrote to both War on Want and the Charities Commission about the Chrismas cards. He noted the lack of context and War on Wants political agenda which he says is one sides and seeks to "condemn Israel while lending support to a notorious terrorist organization" <ref>{{cite web|date=] |url=http://mid-eastplus.blogspot.com/2006/12/new-christmas-myth.html |title=The new Christmas myth |publisher=Dr Denis MacEoin |accessdate=2007-02-07}}</ref>. Though complaints about War on Want are sometimes filed with the Charity Commission, no complaint has ever been upheld.


War on Want’s campaign for Palestinian human rights has drawn praise from ], who named the charity Campaign of the Week”<ref>{{cite web|date=]|url=http://environment.guardian.co.uk/whatcanido/story/0,,1845068,00.html |title=Campaign of the Week|publisher=]|accessdate=2007-02-09}}</ref>“. The accolade was in response to War on Want’s Profiting from the Occupation, a report on European corporations who are profiting from Israel’s occupation of Palestinain territories.
The UK Charity Commission has investigated War on Want a number of times and warned them about their political activities which may breach their charitable status <ref>{{cite web|date=] |url=http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull&cid=1150885919939 |title=UK team probes anti-Israel event |publisher=] |accessdate=2007-02-07}}</ref><ref>"The charity War on Want has become embroiled with the Commissioners on more than one occasion". Charities and politics — The perennial problem, Liverpool Law Review, Volume 6, Number 1, March, 1984.</ref><ref>"War on Want is among those charities deemed by the Charity Commission to have crossed the line between charitable and political activity". Eleanor Burt, Charities and Political Activity: Time to Re-think the Rules, The Political Quarterly 69 (1), 1998.</ref>

A report<ref>{{cite web|date=] |url=http://www.ngo-monitor.org/article/war_on_want_wages_war_on_israel_update_ |title=War on Want Wages War on Israel (Update) |publisher=] |accessdate=2007-02-07}}</ref> by ] states that War on Want "continues to ignore Palestinian terrorism, misrepresent international law and promote apartheid rhetoric, to justify boycott, sanctions and divestment campaigns against Israel" the report also states that "War on Want is involved in international lobbying to isolate Israel, and has also employed anti-Semitic themes in its campaigns". The report provides a detailed analysis of War on Wants activities in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.


==History== ==History==
Line 61: Line 59:
* their main website * their main website
* *
* report, which earned War on Want ]'s Campaign of the Week.
* from ], Jan 15th 2007 * from ], Jan 15th 2007
* *

Revision as of 16:15, 9 February 2007

File:War on Want logo.jpg

War on Want is an anti-poverty charity based in London, England, which highlights the needs of poverty-stricken areas around the world, lobbying governments and international agencies to tackle problems, as well as raising public awareness of the concerns of developing nations while supporting organisations throughout the third world. War on Want tends to focus on the root causes of poverty rather than its effects, and places importance on enabling people in poverty to solve their own problems.

With the slogan "poverty is political," War on Want focuses on the root causes of poverty rather than its effects, challenging the power structures that keep people poor.

Current work

To achieve its goal of poverty eradication, War on Want works with grassroots partner organisations in the developing world, and campaigns in the UK to raise public awareness and change government policy.

In its campaigning and programmes strands of work, War on Want focuses on

Organisations supported include ones that support child labourers in Guatemala, olive farmers in Palestine and factory workers in China.

War on Want has released a series of 'alternative reports' highlighing issues such as Coca-Cola's overseas activities allegedly causing poverty and environmental damage. They also recently released research on private military and security companies in Iraq and elsewhere being involved in human rights abuses, and a report highlighting how companies such as Tesco, Primark and Asda sell goods made by sweatshop labour in Bangladesh. War on Want's campaigns on corporations call for the British government to regulate these industries as well as the businesses themselves to take responsibility for their actions.

At the 2006 Q Awards the magazine named War on Want its official charity.

Praise and criticism of activities

Conservative Israeli group NGO monitor has accused War On Want of being “involved in international lobbying to isolate Israel" in its campaign material. One example of this was War on Want's Christmas Cards for 2006, which sought to connect the suffering of Jesus to that of the Palestinians.

Author and Middle East commentator Dr Denis MacEoin wrote to both War on Want and the Charities Commission about the Chrismas cards. He noted the lack of context and War on Wants political agenda which he says is one sides and seeks to "condemn Israel while lending support to a notorious terrorist organization" . Though complaints about War on Want are sometimes filed with the Charity Commission, no complaint has ever been upheld.

War on Want’s campaign for Palestinian human rights has drawn praise from The Guardian, who named the charity Campaign of the Week”“. The accolade was in response to War on Want’s Profiting from the Occupation, a report on European corporations who are profiting from Israel’s occupation of Palestinain territories.

History

The organisation was formed in 1951 after a letter from Victor Gollancz to The Guardian was read by the future Prime Minister Harold Wilson, who coined the name. Since then, the organisation has taken part in many campaigns and investigations, including in the 1970s helping to expose baby food companies marketing powdered milk infant formula as a healthier option than breast milk to mothers in the developing world - a dangerous and expensive option for these mothers who had no access to safe drinking water and sterilisation facilities.

In the 1980s, War on Want campaigned on the role of women in the developing world, and supported liberation movements in Eritrea, South Africa and Western Sahara.

From 1983 to 1987, George Galloway was General Secretary of War On Want. The Daily Mirror accused him of living luxuriously at the charity's expense. An independent auditor cleared him of misuse of funds, though he did repay £1,720 in contested expenses. More than two years after Galloway stepped down as General Secretary to serve as a Labour MP, the UK government's Charity Commission investigated War on Want, finding accounting irregularities including that the financial reports were "materially mis-stated" from 1985 to 1989, but little evidence that money was used for non-charitable purposes. Galloway had been general secretary for the first three of those years. The commission said responsibility lay largely with auditors and did not single out individuals for blame. War On Want was found to have been insolvent, and subsequently dismissed all its staff and went into administration. It was rescued and relaunched in 1991.

In the 1990s, it focused on issues that resulted from globalisation, including workers' rights and a call to set up a Tobin Tax on currency speculation.

Finances

Their expenditure in 2004/2005 was almost £1.7million, of which £900,000 went towards partners overseas, £450,000 for campaigning and development education, £260,000 towards fundraising, and £58,000 for management and administration.

References and footnotes

  1. "War on Want Wages War on Israel (Update)". NGO Monitor. 2007-01-15. Retrieved 2007-02-07. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  2. "The new Christmas myth". Dr Denis MacEoin. 2006-12-30. Retrieved 2007-02-07. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  3. "Campaign of the Week". The Guardian. 2007-07-25. Retrieved 2007-02-09. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  4. "Leadership of War on Want marked by turbulence and tension". The Daily Telegraph. 2003-04-23. Retrieved 2007-02-07. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

See also

External links

Categories: