Revision as of 01:59, 15 February 2022 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,381 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Brahmin/Archive 4) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:03, 15 February 2022 edit undoNobita456 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,203 edits →Sourced Content removal: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
No, I wouldn't use Manusmrti as a source either.Let me check whether I remove a source that i shouldn't have. | No, I wouldn't use Manusmrti as a source either.Let me check whether I remove a source that i shouldn't have. | ||
I hope this clarifies the matter.Thanks.] (]) 15:44, 14 February 2022 (UTC) | I hope this clarifies the matter.Thanks.] (]) 15:44, 14 February 2022 (UTC) | ||
== Sourced Content removal == | |||
Why are you removing sourced content Ekdalin? like .other editors are invited to comment here also. |
Revision as of 11:03, 15 February 2022
Skip to table of contents |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brahmin article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to South Asian social groups, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This page was proposed for deletion by Ankush 89 (talk · contribs) on 10 April 2015 with the comment: This article does not meet Misplaced Pages Quality Standards and is just favoured and biased as an attempt to promote the fame of this caste It was contested by Gene93k (talk · contribs) on 10 April 2015 with the comment: Deletion is too controversial for PROD. Requires discussion at AfD. |
Brahmin received a peer review by Misplaced Pages editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This topic is in need of attention from an expert on the subject.The section or sections that need attention may be noted in a message below. |
Archives | ||||
|
||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Martial Brahmins
There Are Many Martial Clans In Brahmins Like Mohyals,Tyagis Etc. They Were Kings. So These Martial Type Brahmin Community Should Also Be Added. Singha90 (talk) 16:56, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Definition in the lede
@Rasnaboy: want to discuss about your revision.Worldmonk (talk) 06:52, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hi User:Worldmonk. Greetings. I guess you're talking about the latest revision wherein I reverted your recent edit on this page. I did it because the lede should simply summarize what has been discussed in the article. I agree with your claim that the term Brahmin fundamentally refers to a person who has attained enlightenment, but the topic of the article is not that. Here, it refers to the name of the sect, which is being discussed in the rest of the article. If you can provide a source for your claim, maybe we can add it in the etymology section. This is similar to how the term vegetarianism is being treated in the article on vegetarianism; although the term originally refers to "eating anything that is derived from plants (and only plants)" (i.e., plant-based or vegan), the mainstream meaning today has morphed to include milk, honey, leather, silk, etc. This is what has to go in the article's lede. Hope this makes sense. Please feel free to discuss what you think. Thank you. Rasnaboy (talk) 07:34, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Flow
@Jonathansammy: Your claim that my reordering the flow of the lede introduces POV is bizarre - the original version of the article talks about Brahmins as a class, jumps into discussing their occupations, and then returns to an issue of class (i.e. prestige). I cannot see what quarrel one could reasonably have with the lede identifying Brahmins as a class (and commenting on the ritual (and consequently social) prestige that attaches, which is one of the most salient characteristics of the class), before proceeding to discuss occupations. You've also reverted my removal of a primary source; we should not be citing the Manusmrti directly.
Hölderlin2019 (talk) 15:34, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
@Hölderlin2019:, My objection is to the statement that "in theory they are the most respected". You cite Doniger, but I couldn't find anything in her book which said brahmins were the most respected. Brahmins do have the highest ritual status but does that translate in to "the most respected"? No, I wouldn't use Manusmrti as a source either.Let me check whether I remove a source that i shouldn't have. I hope this clarifies the matter.Thanks.Jonathansammy (talk) 15:44, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Sourced Content removal
Why are you removing sourced content Ekdalin? like this .other editors are invited to comment here also.
Categories:- Misplaced Pages articles under general sanctions
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class India articles
- Mid-importance India articles
- B-Class India articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject India articles
- B-Class Hinduism articles
- High-importance Hinduism articles
- WikiProject templates with unknown parameters
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
- Old requests for peer review