| Revision as of 03:54, 1 March 2022 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,431 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Abecedare/Archive 24) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:06, 17 March 2022 edit undoVenkat TL (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers53,584 edits →Stalking: new sectionTag: New topicNext edit → | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
| For the my snark yesterday. Have a good weekend Abe 👍 ] 12:42, 27 February 2022 (UTC) | For the my snark yesterday. Have a good weekend Abe 👍 ] 12:42, 27 February 2022 (UTC) | ||
| :{{reply|Serial Number 54129}} No problem. You had a point and good to be alert to the issue. Cheers. ] (]) 17:17, 27 February 2022 (UTC) | :{{reply|Serial Number 54129}} No problem. You had a point and good to be alert to the issue. Cheers. ] (]) 17:17, 27 February 2022 (UTC) | ||
| == Stalking == | |||
| Hi, I wanted to thank you for your help in resolving the situation yesterday. There has been another development, Usernamekiran has now started stalking me. Please check which he reached followed the link of my userpage and then reverted my edit. I have raised it on the article talk as well as user talk . What do you suggest I should do. This is pointy behavior. ] (]) 11:06, 17 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:06, 17 March 2022
Please sign your messages by appending ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Tipu Sultan Dispute Resolution
Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
How we will see unregistered users
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Fully Source cited but yet Reverted
I'm a new Wikipidians, and so May be i did mistakes But I will correct in every aspect , you're a Administrators , you have so much experienced and I know that Administrators can block me, if I can edit any Misplaced Pages Page's without a proper sources or with personal agenda. But here I Didn't edit with personnel thinking, this is the true fact with article with true souces like Indian Express, times of India, and hindustan times. Sir you have so much experienced as a Wikipidians then how can you force your narrative in a new Misplaced Pages users? And, What is the reasoning behind to Make the Rules of Content regulations should be highlighted with fully Sources with a section. Sandymark11 (talk) 18:20, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Sandymark11: I had explained the reasons for my edits in the edit-summaries and have expanded upon those on the article talk page. We can continue the discussion there so that other interested editors can also participate. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 18:27, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Abecedare, Please check Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Mauryabhi7715. Sid95Q (talk) 19:55, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, Sid95Q. I have added my comment at SPI. Abecedare (talk) 20:39, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Abecedare, Please check Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Mauryabhi7715. Sid95Q (talk) 19:55, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Apologies
For the my snark yesterday. Have a good weekend Abe 👍 SN54129 12:42, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Serial Number 54129: No problem. You had a point and good to be alert to the issue. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 17:17, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Stalking
Hi, I wanted to thank you for your help in resolving the situation yesterday. There has been another development, Usernamekiran has now started stalking me. Please check which he reached followed the link of my userpage and then reverted my edit. I have raised it on the article talk as well as user talk . What do you suggest I should do. This is pointy behavior. Venkat TL (talk) 11:06, 17 March 2022 (UTC)