| Revision as of 07:25, 7 March 2022 editGonnym (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Template editors224,977 edits Notification: listing of Template:Whoosh at WP:Templates for discussion.Tag: Twinkle← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:10, 9 May 2022 edit undoGuerillero (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators26,503 edits →Edit summary: new sectionTags: contentious topics alert New topicNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| == Nomination for deletion of ] == | == Nomination for deletion of ] == | ||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 07:25, 7 March 2022 (UTC) | ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 07:25, 7 March 2022 (UTC) | ||
| == Edit summary == | |||
| {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
| You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
| To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{tlx|Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
| }}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
| Please refrain from editorializing in about what should happen. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 14:10, 9 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:10, 9 May 2022
February 2022
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.192.76.8.77 (talk) 19:56, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Hey... Are you okay?
It's about a month too early for April Fools... Care to explain your recent actions? --Jayron32 18:55, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Jayron32: I got curious, and intended to delete the resulting section (if created) as soon as it came into existence, so as not to disrupt anything. It was merely a nomination via Twinkle, and wouldn't have actually done anything unless community consensus was established in the few seconds it would have taken me to remove the section. On top of that, the section wasn't actually created, although it did make a red link, which I'm glad you noticed and deleted. TL;DR Got curious over whether Twinkle would actually nominate it (it didn't, thanks to the proactive actions of a certain administrator) had a contingency plan in place if it did, and overall, even in the worst case scenario, disruption would have been minimal. ☢️Plutonical☢️ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ 19:01, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, please don't. You're already the subject of a lengthy ANI thread, and the latest little prank is likely to get you blocked. Patience is wearing thin. --Jayron32 19:03, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Considering there is an active, ongoing ANI thread about you screwing around in areas you shouldn't, screwing around in yet another area you shouldn't is not smart. Please be aware that if you screw around one more time, I will block you indefinitely, with no further warnings. I'm not talking about a WP-space topic ban, or partial blocks, or a mentor; this would be an indefinite sitewide block. This is not a playground. Also, this is me being nice; there is still the possibility that another admin with less patience will block you indefinitely for this screwing around. Stop it. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:10, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Jayron32: yeah, that really wasn't the brightest move. I really thought I wasn't going to cause much of a problem, but that was clearly wrong. ☢️Plutonical☢️ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ 19:11, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Floquenbeam I will absolutely stop. This really wasn't a great idea. Thanks for the final warning.
- Normally I would be reassured by this, but you said very similar things previously at the ANI thread. It is important that you really mean it this time. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:15, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Floquenbeam I will absolutely stop. This really wasn't a great idea. Thanks for the final warning.
just for good measure, I think I'll just stay out of the behind-the-scenes component entirely, including AIV and UAA reports. ☢️Plutonical☢️ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ 19:13, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
my edit didn't need a source. it regarded information that was already sourced elsewhere on the page but was updating language to refer to his newly separated wife. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.255.68.101 (talk) 00:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Whoosh
Template:Whoosh has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:25, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Edit summary
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Please refrain from editorializing in edit summaries about what should happen. -- Guerillero 14:10, 9 May 2022 (UTC)