Revision as of 17:39, 19 February 2007 edit83.19.173.202 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:09, 19 February 2007 edit undoHongQiGong (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers27,196 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Edit warring== | |||
{{uw-3rr}} --] 17:19, 19 February 2007 (UTC) | {{uw-3rr}} --] 17:19, 19 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
You are a hypocrit pretending to act like a neutral administrator. It is not I who is edit warring, I am simply writing down the true UNDENIABLE FACTS about the Republic of China (Taiwan) while you continuously try to squeeze in pro-PRC propaganda that makes the {{flagicon|Taiwan}} ''']''' look like a part of the territory of the {{flagicon|People's Republic of China}} ''']'''. | You are a hypocrit pretending to act like a neutral administrator. It is not I who is edit warring, I am simply writing down the true UNDENIABLE FACTS about the Republic of China (Taiwan) while you continuously try to squeeze in pro-PRC propaganda that makes the {{flagicon|Taiwan}} ''']''' look like a part of the territory of the {{flagicon|People's Republic of China}} ''']'''. | ||
==Your reverts on ]== | |||
] | |||
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly{{{{{subst|}}}#if:People's Republic of China|, as you are doing in ]}}. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for ], even if they do not technically violate the ]. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR --> | |||
] <small>(] - ])</small> 18:09, 19 February 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:09, 19 February 2007
Edit warring
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Ideogram 17:19, 19 February 2007 (UTC) You are a hypocrit pretending to act like a neutral administrator. It is not I who is edit warring, I am simply writing down the true UNDENIABLE FACTS about the Republic of China (Taiwan) while you continuously try to squeeze in pro-PRC propaganda that makes the Republic of China (Taiwan) look like a part of the territory of the People's Republic of China.
Your reverts on People's Republic of China
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in People's Republic of China. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 18:09, 19 February 2007 (UTC)