| Revision as of 05:20, 21 February 2007 editRJASE1 (talk | contribs)14,993 editsm in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Ejaculation. TWINKLE← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:23, 21 February 2007 edit undoGen. von Klinkerhoffen (talk | contribs)260 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please read ]. {{{2|}}}<!-- {{uw-3rr}} --> ] ] 05:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please read ]. {{{2|}}}<!-- {{uw-3rr}} --> ] ] 05:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :Yup, you've definitely broken 3RR rule. Please, report yourself to authorities ;-). ] 05:23, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:23, 21 February 2007
Put your message below.
February 2007
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, Misplaced Pages is not censored, not even to remove profanity or pornography. Please do not remove or censor information that is relevant to the article, as you did to Pearl necklace (sexuality). Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Prolog 02:29, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Serious encyclopedia is not the place to host pornography. Thank you. Gen. von Klinkerhoffen 02:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages works by building consensus and you are welcome to join the discussions on the respective talk pages of these articles. However, if you instead continue removing the images it might be regarded as vandalism. Thanks, Prolog 02:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- See my response below. Gen. von Klinkerhoffen 03:18, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages works by building consensus and you are welcome to join the discussions on the respective talk pages of these articles. However, if you instead continue removing the images it might be regarded as vandalism. Thanks, Prolog 02:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. Misplaced Pages is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to Ejaculation, will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. RJASE1 02:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Ejaculation
I am neutral in regards to this article (I just watch it for vandalism) but, looking at the talk archives, it appears this image was arrived at through consensus. Please discuss before removing. If it helps, it appears the guidelines for these types of images are being discussed here. RJASE1 02:46, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Misplaced Pages, as you did to Pearl necklace (sexuality), you will be blocked from editing. RJASE1 02:47, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Making Misplaced Pages better (i.e. removing pornography) is not vandalizing. Thank you. Gen. von Klinkerhoffen 02:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Look, just please read WP:NOT#CENSOR on policy and please work toward a consensus before making potentially controversial deletions of article content. I'd be happy to help so far as I can with any questions you may have. RJASE1 02:55, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- These pictures are "potentially controversial". Removal of them is making the article less controversial, not more. BTW - founder of Misplaced Pages, Jimbo Wales, removed some picture without "gaining consensus". He has done right thing, because serious encyclopedia is really not the place for pornography. And I am going to do right thing too. :-) Gen. von Klinkerhoffen 03:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- You should be making your arguments on the talk pages of the affected articles, not to me. RJASE1 03:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'm writing here, because you've accused me of vandalism and censorship, and I believe your accusations are baseless. I am only concerned with overall quality of Misplaced Pages as serious encyclopedia. Gen. von Klinkerhoffen 03:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- You should be making your arguments on the talk pages of the affected articles, not to me. RJASE1 03:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- These pictures are "potentially controversial". Removal of them is making the article less controversial, not more. BTW - founder of Misplaced Pages, Jimbo Wales, removed some picture without "gaining consensus". He has done right thing, because serious encyclopedia is really not the place for pornography. And I am going to do right thing too. :-) Gen. von Klinkerhoffen 03:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Look, just please read WP:NOT#CENSOR on policy and please work toward a consensus before making potentially controversial deletions of article content. I'd be happy to help so far as I can with any questions you may have. RJASE1 02:55, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know what else I can do besides cite the policies regarding images of this type. Like I said, I really couldn't care less about the images themselves, but unilateral edits of the type you are making lead to edit wars. As I said above, the guidelines for these kinds of images are currently being discussed here, and I'm sure your input would be welcome. In the meantime, please don't engage in disruptive editing. RJASE1 03:21, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ejaculation. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please read WP:3RR. RJASE1 05:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yup, you've definitely broken 3RR rule. Please, report yourself to authorities ;-). Gen. von Klinkerhoffen 05:23, 21 February 2007 (UTC)