| Revision as of 08:13, 11 April 2007 editHu12 (talk | contribs)91,877 edits Revert to revision 121890494 dated 2007-04-11 07:49:42 by IvoShandor using popups← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:00, 1 September 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Removed stale messages from inactive IP talkpage. (Task 13)Tags: AWB Replaced | ||
| (26 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Blanked IP talk}} | |||
| ] | |||
| ==Huh?== | |||
| You can't demand that I don't post here, how else am I supposed to communicate with you. In addition, no admin blanked your page, you did. ] 07:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::And I am not a troll, I am a dedicated and hard working Wikipedian. Please don't group me with slime like that, thanks. ] 07:49, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Rudeness== | |||
| I apologize if you think I attacked you or was otherwise rude. I am just frustrated by your apparent disregarding of comments that disagree with you. You seem to think inclusion of the link has won, which is not the case. Yesterday I counted 17 opinions in some form or another. | |||
| *10 for: 3 were either the users sole contributions or majority of, so if we disregard that 7 | |||
| *7 against: 2 of which were either the user's sole contributions or majority of, so if we disregard that 5 | |||
| 7 to 5 simply doesn't represent consensus. Sorry. 07:13, ] 07:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::And that's only if you wanna get hyper technical, some of those rationales were pretty weak and as such generally wouldn't be included as deciding factors in consensus. Maybe read over ], it may help you see what to shoot for. ] 07:15, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Sheesh. Real nice, you removed my comment? Why? ] 07:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you are doing at ]}}. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for ], even if they do not technically violate the ]. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR -->--] 07:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Instead of choosing to respond, you blank the page? This doesn't make sense to me. Why not respond? I wasn't rude. I was merely pointing out that there is no consensus. It would seem you are not interested at all in discussion. ] 07:40, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <div style="clear: both"></div>]'''You have been {{#if:{{{1|}}}||temporarily}} ] from editing Misplaced Pages {{#if:{{{1|}}}|for a period of {{{1|}}}}} as a result of your {{#if:{{{2|}}}|disruptive edits to ]|disruptive edits}}.''' You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that ] (including page blanking or addition of ]), ], deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, ]; and repeated, blatant violations of our ] policy will not be tolerated.<!-- Template:Test5 -->--] 07:47, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:00, 1 September 2022
Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.