| Revision as of 18:31, 15 September 2022 editHey man im josh (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators347,832 edits Caution: Personal attack directed at a specific editor on User talk:LJstats.Tags: Twinkle Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:32, 15 September 2022 edit undoLJstats (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users635 editsNo edit summaryTag: Manual revertNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| :::At an event like high jump or pole vault you would get littered by secondary marks. Many athletes have equaled their personal best a dozen times.] (]) 14:24, 28 June 2022 (UTC) | :::At an event like high jump or pole vault you would get littered by secondary marks. Many athletes have equaled their personal best a dozen times.] (]) 14:24, 28 June 2022 (UTC) | ||
| ::::I'm not a fan of ignore equal marks and ancillary jumps and throws. Just think of Crowsers big ancillary shot put throws (23.01 m, 23.11 m) in his last series in Eugene. This kind of stats f.e. also don't do justice to Duplantis' dominance in the pole vault.] (]) 15:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC) | ::::I'm not a fan of ignore equal marks and ancillary jumps and throws. Just think of Crowsers big ancillary shot put throws (23.01 m, 23.11 m) in his last series in Eugene. This kind of stats f.e. also don't do justice to Duplantis' dominance in the pole vault.] (]) 15:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC) | ||
| ==Average human height by country== | |||
| We both know you were warned about edit-warring at ] and so was I. The page became protected for a short time, and I note that whilst it had been protected, you did not make an appearance at the talk page. It is my belief therefore that your hours after the protection was automatically lifted amounts to ] (gaming the system). I kindly ask that you self-revert at the first available opportunity and I also invite you to return to the talk page as we try to all agree upon a way forward. --] (]) 18:01, 15 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
| Don't be ridiculous you Slavic manlet. Your opinion is a unique selling point on the talk page. Get the fuck off my side! ] (]) 18:30, 15 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == September 2022 == | |||
| ] Please do not ] other editors, as you did at ]. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npa2 --> ] (]) 18:31, 15 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:32, 15 September 2022
CyberLeninka
That a paper is hosted on CyberLeninka is nothing special, that's like a paper being hosted on ResearchGate or Zenodo. Those are general unfiltered repositories where you can upload pretty much anything.
The actual publisher of this journal is the "Eurasian Union of Scientists", which is a predatory publisher. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:55, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
100 metres
Record runs with the same time are worth mentioning no less than the time of the first run. They also count as records.Montell 74 (talk) 14:05, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- I get your argument but we should follow World Athletics standards.LJstats (talk) 14:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- To your information, Bracy ran 9.85 on three different occasions.LJstats (talk) 14:20, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- At an event like high jump or pole vault you would get littered by secondary marks. Many athletes have equaled their personal best a dozen times.LJstats (talk) 14:24, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not a fan of ignore equal marks and ancillary jumps and throws. Just think of Crowsers big ancillary shot put throws (23.01 m, 23.11 m) in his last series in Eugene. This kind of stats f.e. also don't do justice to Duplantis' dominance in the pole vault.Montell 74 (talk) 15:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- At an event like high jump or pole vault you would get littered by secondary marks. Many athletes have equaled their personal best a dozen times.LJstats (talk) 14:24, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- To your information, Bracy ran 9.85 on three different occasions.LJstats (talk) 14:20, 28 June 2022 (UTC)