Revision as of 15:06, 1 March 2007 editUrthogie (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,196 edits reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:09, 1 March 2007 edit undoUrthogie (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,196 edits no reply stillNext edit → | ||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I'll continue to revert until you explain why it's not original research.--] 15:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC) | :I'll continue to revert until you explain why it's not original research.--] 15:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
:You've broken the 3 Revert rule. Please revert yourself before I report you for this. I'll give you an hour.--] 15:14, 1 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Count the reverts. Who has broken it? ] 15:54, 1 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
:You, for bringing a single version back 3 times within 24 hours..--] 16:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
:No reply..should I just report you for it? I'll give you another 30 minutes.--] 17:09, 1 March 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:09, 1 March 2007
Useful
This article clearly provides useful information regarding the relationship between underground, alternative and indie hip hop. Only one person seems to have a problem with it. Please difer to the majority and stop erasing this info. Thanks. House of Scandal 14:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Reverted. It's original research, and I don't need to justify the removal of original research.--Urthogie 14:42, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'll continue to revert until you explain why it's not original research.--Urthogie 15:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- You've broken the 3 Revert rule. Please revert yourself before I report you for this. I'll give you an hour.--Urthogie 15:14, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Count the reverts. Who has broken it? House of Scandal 15:54, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- You, for bringing a single version back 3 times within 24 hours..--Urthogie 16:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- No reply..should I just report you for it? I'll give you another 30 minutes.--Urthogie 17:09, 1 March 2007 (UTC)