| Revision as of 22:05, 4 December 2022 editGeneral Ization (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers165,762 edits →December 2022← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:06, 4 December 2022 edit undo2a00:23c7:2b86:9801:7d16:a849:4bd3:b993 (talk) I’ve already said that… someone isn’t in listening modeTag: BlankingNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == December 2022 == | |||
| ] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], without giving a valid reason for the removal in the ]. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been ]. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the ] for that. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:140;">]</span> <sup>] </sup> 21:31, 4 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| {{Block indent|''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider ] for yourself or ] so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''}}<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
| ] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Misplaced Pages without giving a valid reason for the removal in the ], as you did at ]. <!-- Template:uw-delete4 --> <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:140;">]</span> <sup>] </sup> 21:33, 4 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| {{Block indent|''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider ] for yourself or ] so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''}}<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
| *{{u|General Ization}}, I appreciate this is a template message, but next time, please don’t post something saying I didn’t leave a rationale when there was one left. I’m removing a BLP violation from the article - someone trying to claim something unsupported by the sources they are claiming. As it’s both BLP and BRD, my actions are correct. ] (]) 21:35, 4 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| “without giving a valid reason for the removal in the ]”. Twice you’ve accused me of that and twice you have been wrong. ] (]) 21:36, 4 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :You've now twice removed citations from the article. If you think there is ''content'' that is uncited, the appropriate action would be to a) add a template to indicate same, b) remove the ''uncited content'' and/or c) discuss on the article Talk page, '''not''' to remove citations from the article. If you do so again, I will request you be immediately ]. Do you understand? <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:140;">]</span> <sup>] </sup> 21:38, 4 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| *{{u|General Ization}}? I guess you need to re-read ] again. I am removing a BLP violation that was recently added. BLP and BRD are both in play here. ] (]) 21:40, 4 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :And since you again removed the citations after the warning above, I have requested you be blocked as promised. You can discuss it with the blocking admin. <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:140;">]</span> <sup>] </sup> 21:41, 4 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :You also should review our policy on ] and ], since it appears that you have now made effectively the same edit 6 times using IP addresses that I believe are related. <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:140;">]</span> <sup>] </sup> 21:45, 4 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{u|General Ization}}, you really need to re-read ]: “{{tq|Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—'''must be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion'''}}. (Emphasis in the original). This was pointed out several times to you, but you have ignored it for some reason. ] (]) 21:47, 4 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :::That would explain your initial removal. However, another editor located a source that they believed supported the content and added it. You are asserting that it did not adequately support the content, but that is the point at which you initiate a discussion on the Talk page, not repeatedly remove both the content and the sources based purely on your assessment of the sources. <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:140;">]</span> <sup>] </sup> 21:50, 4 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :::The issue, IP, is that consensus is against you on this. Most things like this are subjective, what counts as "enough" sourcing or "poor" sourcing etc. In this case, it should be clear to you that multiple others disagree with your view. The thing to do in such an instance is to go to the talk page when your BOLD action is reverted. Not to continue reinstating it just because you firmly believe you are right. Everyone believes they are right. See also: ]. — ] <sup>(]</sup> <sup>])</sup> 21:51, 4 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :::Exactly. Also, ''even if you think your removal is justified'' and the warning is unwarranted, removing the content again after receiving a final warning, as you did, is an invitation to be blocked for disruptive editing. <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:140;">]</span> <sup>] </sup> 21:58, 4 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| You are both wrong in thought and deed on this. The very long held STATUS QUO was without the claim by an American editor that Rylance was an American. Not smart behaviour to try and claim it, nor to use misleading claims and dubious sources to create a BLP violation. The request for blocking was rejected, which may give you pause for thought on your actions. ] (]) 22:00, 4 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes, I see that the AIV report was removed without action or comment. I find this interesting and will discuss independently with the admin who took that action, but that being the case, please continue the discussion on the article Talk page. <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:140;">]</span> <sup>] </sup> 22:05, 4 December 2022 (UTC) | |||