| Revision as of 22:51, 4 December 2022 editShibbolethink (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers28,615 editsm edit comment (CD)Tag: Reverted← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:56, 5 December 2022 edit undo2a00:23c7:2b86:9801:655c:41a2:7382:ee32 (talk) Undid revision 1125794433 by Shibbolethink (talk) A simple "no" will have to sufficeTags: Blanking Undo | ||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{tq|You are both wrong in thought and deed on this. The very long held STATUS QUO was without the claim by an American editor that Rylance was an American. Not smart behaviour to try and claim it, nor to use misleading claims and dubious sources to create a BLP violation. The request for blocking was rejected, which may give you pause for thought on your actions. }} | |||
| Eh.... Admins don't adjudicate content disputes or "decide who is correct" in content disputes. More likely that the admin in question saw the page was protected, and figured enough had been done to prevent disruption. More importantly, you were editing against consensus. It doesn't matter how "correct" you were, that's not how wikipedia works. If you're sure you're right, the correct move is to find more input to generate a more thorough consensus, not edit war to establish your preferred version as the "correct" one. I guarantee that, regardless of how "right" you are, continuing to behave in this way will get your IP range blocked eventually.— ] <sup>(]</sup> <sup>])</sup> 22:49, 4 December 2022 (UTC) | |||