| Revision as of 02:20, 6 September 2010 editRupie1301 (talk | contribs)4 edits →Nature of myths← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:01, 14 December 2022 edit undoWiki13565 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users23,850 edits {{R to section}} {{R hatnote}} | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| {{Dablink|For other uses, see ], and ].}} | |||
| {{Redirect category shell| | |||
| ]'' (1868 by ]). The myth of Prometheus was first attested by ] and then constituted the basis for a tragic trilogy of plays, possibly by ], consisting of '']'', '']'' and '']'']] | |||
| {{R with history}} | |||
| {{R to section}} | |||
| The term '''mythology''' can refer to either the study of myths, or to a body of myths.<ref>Kirk, p. 8; "myth", ''Encyclopædia Britannica''</ref> For example, ] is the study of connections between myths from different cultures,<ref name="Littleton, p. 32"/> whereas ] is the body of myths from ]. The term "myth" is often used ] to refer to a false story,<ref>Armstrong, p. 7</ref><ref name = "eliademythtruth">Eliade, ''Myth and Reality'', p. 1</ref> but academic use of the term generally does not pass judgment on truth or falsity.<ref name = "eliademythtruth"/><ref name = "dundesintro">Dundes, Introduction, p. 1</ref> In the study of ], a myth is a sacred narrative explaining how the world and humankind came to be in their present form.<ref name = "dundesintro"/><ref name="Dundes, Binary, p. 45">Dundes, "Binary", p. 45</ref><ref name = "madness">Dundes, "Madness", p. 147</ref> Many scholars in other fields use the term "myth" in somewhat different ways.<ref name = "madness"/><ref>Doty, p. 11-12</ref><ref>Segal, p. 5</ref> In a very broad sense, the word can refer to any traditional story.<ref>Kirk, "Defining", p. 57; Kirk, ''Myth'', p. 74; Simpson, p. 3</ref> | |||
| {{R hatnote}} | |||
| }} | |||
| ==Nature of myths== | |||
| ===Typical characteristics=== | |||
| The main sexy people in myths are usually gods or supernatural heroes.<ref name = "mythnature">Bascom, p. 9</ref><ref name = "mythfolk">"myths", ''A Dictionary of English Folklore''</ref><ref>O'Flaherty, p.19: "I think it can be well argued as a matter of principle that, just as 'biography is about chaps', so mythology is about gods."</ref> As sacred stories, myths are often endorsed by rulers and priests and closely linked to religion.<ref name = "mythnature"/> In the society in which it is told, a myth is usually regarded as a true account of the remote past.<ref name = "mythnature"/><ref name = "mythfolk"/><ref name = "eliademyth">Eliade, ''Myths, Dreams and Mysteries'', p. 23</ref><ref>Pettazzoni, p. 102</ref> In fact, many societies have two categories of traditional narrative, "true stories" or myths, and "false stories" or fables.<ref>Eliade, ''Myth and Reality'', p. 10-11; Pettazzoni, p. 99-101</ref> Myths generally take place in a primordial age, when the world had not yet achieved its current form,<ref name = "mythnature"/> and explain how the world gained its current form<ref name="dundesintro"/><ref name="Dundes, Binary, p. 45"/><ref name="madness"/><ref name = "originmyth">Eliade, ''Myth and Reality'', p. 6</ref> and how ], ]s and ]s were established.<ref name = "mythnature"/><ref name = "originmyth"/> | |||
| ===Related concepts=== | |||
| {{See also|Legend|Folktale}} | |||
| Closely related to myth are ] and ]. Myths, legends, and folktales are different types of traditional story.<ref>Bascom, p. 7</ref> Unlike myths, folktales can take place at any time and any place, and they are not considered true or sacred by the societies that tell them.<ref name = "mythnature"/> Like myths, legends are stories that are traditionally considered true, but are set in a more recent time, when the world was much as it is today.<ref name = "mythnature"/> Legends generally feature humans as their main characters, whereas myths generally focus on superhuman characters.<ref name = "mythnature"/> | |||
| The distinction between myth, legend, and folktale is meant simply as a useful tool for grouping traditional stories.<ref name = "mythlegendfolk">Bascom, p. 10</ref> In many cultures, it is hard to draw a sharp line between myths and legends.<ref>Kirk, ''Myth'', p. 22, 32; Kirk, "Defining", p. 55</ref> Instead of dividing their traditional stories into myths, legends, and folktales, some cultures divide them into two categories, one that roughly corresponds to folktales, and one that combines myths and legends.<ref>Bascom, p. 17</ref> Even myths and folktales are not completely distinct. A story may be considered true (and therefore a myth) in one society, but considered fictional (and therefore a folktale) in another society.<ref>Bascom, p. 13</ref><ref name = "doty">Doty, p. 114</ref> In fact, when a myth loses its status as part of a religious system, it often takes on traits more typical of folktales, with its formerly divine characters reinterpreted as human heroes, giants, or fairies.<ref name = "mythfolk"/> | |||
| Myth, legend, and folktale are only a few of the categories of traditional stories. Other categories include ] and some kinds of ].<ref name = "mythlegendfolk"/> Traditional stories, in turn, are only one category within folklore, which also includes items such as gestures, costumes, and music.<ref name = "doty"/> | |||
| ==Origins of myth== | |||
| ===Euhemerism=== | |||
| {{Main|Euhemerus}} | |||
| One theory claims that myths are distorted accounts of real historical events.<ref name = "bulfincheuhemerism">Bulfinch, p. 194</ref><ref name = "honkoancienttheories">Honko, p. 45</ref> According to this theory, storytellers repeatedly elaborated upon historical accounts until the figures in those accounts gained the status of gods.<ref name = "bulfincheuhemerism"/><ref name = "honkoancienttheories"/> For example, one might argue that the myth of the wind-god ] evolved from a historical account of a king who taught his people to use sails and interpret the winds.<ref name = "bulfincheuhemerism"/> ] (5th century BC) and ] made claims of this kind.<ref name = "honkoancienttheories"/> This theory is named "euhemerism" after the mythologist ] (c.320 BC), who suggested that the Greek gods developed from legends about human beings.<ref name = "honkoancienttheories"/><ref>"Euhemerism", ''The Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Religions''</ref> | |||
| ===Allegory=== | |||
| Some theories propose that myths began as ]. According to one theory, myths began as allegories for natural phenomena: ] represents fire, ] represents water, and so on.<ref name = "honkoancienttheories"/> According to another theory, myths began as allegories for philosophical or spiritual concepts: ] represents wise judgment, ] represents desire, etc.<ref name = "honkoancienttheories"/> The 19th century ] ] supported an allegorical theory of myth. He believed that myths began as allegorical descriptions of nature, but gradually came to be interpreted literally: for example, a poetic description of the sea as "raging" was eventually taken literally, and the sea was then thought of as a raging god.<ref>Segal, p. 20</ref> | |||
| ===Personification=== | |||
| {{See also|Mythopoeic thought}} | |||
| Some thinkers believe that myths resulted from the personification of inanimate objects and forces. According to these thinkers, the ancients worshipped natural phenomena such as fire and air, gradually coming to describe them as gods.<ref>Bulfinch, p. 195</ref> For example, according to the theory of ], the ancients tended to view things as persons, not as mere objects;<ref>Frankfort, p. 4</ref> thus, they described natural events as acts of personal gods, thus giving rise to myths.<ref>Frankfort, p. 15</ref> | |||
| ===The myth-ritual theory=== | |||
| {{See also|Myth and ritual}} | |||
| According to the myth-ritual theory, the existence of myth is tied to ritual.<ref>Segal, p. 61</ref> In its most extreme form, this theory claims that myths arose to explain rituals.<ref>Graf, p. 40</ref> This claim was first put forward by the biblical scholar ].<ref>Meletinsky pp.19-20</ref> According to Smith, people begin performing rituals for some reason that is not related to myth; later, after they have forgotten the original reason for a ritual, they try to account for the ritual by inventing a myth and claiming that the ritual commemorates the events described in that myth.<ref>Segal, p. 63</ref> The anthropologist ] had a similar theory. Frazer believed that primitive man starts out with a belief in magical laws; later, when man begins to lose faith in magic, he invents myths about gods and claims that his formerly magical rituals are religious rituals intended to appease the gods.<ref name="Frazer, p. 711">Frazer, p. 711</ref> | |||
| ==Functions of myth== | |||
| ] argued that one of the foremost functions of myth is to establish models for behavior<ref>Eliade, ''Myth and Reality'', p. 8</ref><ref name = "honkomythfunction">Honko, p. 51</ref> and that myths may also provide a religious experience. By telling or reenacting myths, members of traditional societies detach themselves from the present and return to the mythical age, thereby bringing themselves closer to the divine.<ref name = "eliademyth"/><ref name = "honkomythfunction"/><ref>Eliade, ''Myth and Reality'', p. 19</ref> | |||
| Larui Honko asserts that, in some cases, a society will reenact a myth in an attempt to reproduce the conditions of the mythical age. For example, it will reenact the healing performed by a god at the beginning of time in order to heal someone in the present.<ref>Honko, p. 49</ref> Similarly, Roland Barthes argues that modern culture explores religious experience. Because it is not the job of science to define human morality, a religious experience is an attempt to connect with a perceived moral past, which is in contrast with the technological present.<ref>Roland Barthes, Mythologies</ref> | |||
| ] defined myths as having four basic functions: the Mystical Function--experiencing the awe of the universe; the Cosmological Function--explaining the shape of the universe; the Sociological Function--supporting and validating a certain social order; and the Pedagogical Function--how to live a human lifetime under any circumstances.<ref>Campbell, p. 22-23</ref> | |||
| ==The study of mythology: a historical overview== | |||
| {{see also|Comparative mythology}} | |||
| Historically, the important approaches to the study of mythology have been those of ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], the ], and the ].<ref>Guy Lanoue, Foreword to Meletinsky, p.viii</ref> | |||
| ===Pre-modern theories=== | |||
| The critical interpretation of myth goes back as far as the ].<ref name="Segal, p. 1">Segal, p. 1</ref> ] was one of the most important pre-modern mythologists. He interpreted myths as accounts of actual historical events, distorted over many retellings. This view of myths and their origin is criticised by Plato in the '']'' (229d), in which Socrates says that this approach is the province of one who is "vehemently curious and laborious, and not entirely happy . . ." The Platonists generally had a more profound and comprehensive view of the subject. ],<ref>On the Gods and the World, ch. 5, See Collected Writings on the Gods and the World, The Prometheus Trust, Frome, 1995</ref> for example, divides myths into five categories – theological, physical (or concerning natural laws), animastic (or concerning soul), material and mixed. This last being those myths which show the interaction between two or more of the previous categories and which, he says, are particularly used in initiations. | |||
| Although Plato famously condemned poetic myth when discussing the education of the young in the '']'', primarily on the grounds that there was a danger that the young and uneducated might take the stories of Gods and heroes literally, nevertheless he constantly refers to myths of all kinds throughout his writings. As Platonism developed in the phases commonly called 'middle Platonism' and ], such writers as ], ], ], ] and ] wrote explicitly about the symbolic interpretation of traditional and Orphic myths.<ref>Perhaps the most extended passage of philosophic interpretation of myth is to be found in the fifth and sixth essays of Proclus’ ''Commentary on the Republic'' (to be found in ''The Works of Plato I'', trans. Thomas Taylor, The Prometheus Trust, Frome, 1996); Porphyry’s analysis of the Homeric Cave of the Nymphs is another important work in this area (''Select Works of Porphyry'', Thomas Taylor The Prometheus Trust, Frome, 1994). See the external links below for a full English translation.</ref> | |||
| Interest in polytheistic mythology revived in the ], with early works on mythography appearing in the 16th century, such as the '']'' (1532). | |||
| ===19th-century theories=== | |||
| The first scholarly theories of myth appeared during the second half of the 19th century.<ref name="Segal, p. 1"/> In general, these 19th-century theories framed myth as a failed or obsolete mode of thought, often by interpreting myth as the primitive counterpart of modern science.<ref>Segal, pp. 3-4</ref> | |||
| For example, ] interpreted myth as an attempt at a literal explanation for natural phenomena: unable to conceive of impersonal natural laws, early man tried to explain natural phenomena by attributing souls to inanimate objects, giving rise to ].<ref>Segal, p. 4</ref> According to Tylor, human thought evolves through various stages, starting with mythological ideas and gradually progressing to scientific ideas. Not all scholars — not even all 19th century scholars — have agreed with this view. For example, ] claimed that "the primitive mentality is a condition of the human mind, and not a stage in its historical development."<ref>{{cite book|last=Mâche|title=Music, Myth and Nature, or The Dolphins of Arion| year=1992| pages= 8}}</ref> | |||
| ] called myth a "disease of language". He speculated that myths arose due to the lack of abstract nouns and neuter gender in ancient languages: anthropomorphic figures of speech, necessary in such languages, were eventually taken literally, leading to the idea that natural phenomena were conscious beings, gods.<ref>Segal, p.20</ref> | |||
| The anthropologist ] saw myths as a misinterpretation of magical rituals, which were themselves based on a mistaken idea of natural law.<ref>Segal, p.67-68</ref> According to Frazer, man begins with an unfounded belief in impersonal magical laws. When he realizes that his applications of these laws don't work, he gives up his belief in natural law, in favor of a belief in personal gods controlling nature — thus giving rise to religious myths. Meanwhile, man continues practicing formerly magical rituals through force of habit, reinterpreting them as reenactments of mythical events. Finally, Frazer contends, man realizes that nature does follow natural laws, but now he discovers their true nature through science. Here, again, science makes myth obsolete: as Frazer puts it, man progresses "from magic through religion to science".<ref name="Frazer, p. 711"/> | |||
| Robert Segal asserts that by pitting mythical thought against modern scientific thought, such theories implied that modern man must abandon myth.<ref name="Segal, p. 3">Segal, p. 3</ref> | |||
| ===20th Century theories=== | |||
| Many 20th century theories of myth rejected the 19th-century theories' opposition of myth and science. In general, "twentieth-century theories have tended to see myth as almost anything but an outdated counterpart to science Consequently, moderns are not obliged to abandon myth for science."<ref name="Segal, p. 3"/> | |||
| Swiss psychologist ] (1873–1961) tried to understand the psychology behind world myths. Jung asserted that all humans share certain innate unconscious psychological forces, which he called ]. Jung believed that the similarities between the myths from different cultures reveals the existence of these universal archetypes.<ref>Boeree</ref> | |||
| ] believed that there were two different orders of mythology: that there are myths that, "are metaphorical of spiritual potentiality in the human being", and that there are myths, "that have to do with specific societies". <ref>Campbell, p. 22</ref> | |||
| ] believed that myths reflect patterns in the mind and interpreted those patterns more as fixed mental structures — specifically, pairs of opposites (i.e. good/evil, compassionate/callous) — than as unconscious feelings or urges.<ref>Segal, p. 113</ref> | |||
| In his appendix to ''Myths, Dreams and Mysteries'', and in ''The Myth of the Eternal Return'', ] attributed modern man’s anxieties to his rejection of myths and the sense of the ]. | |||
| In the 1950s, ] published a series of essays examining modern myths and the process of their creation in his book '']''. | |||
| ==Comparative mythology== | |||
| {{Main|Comparative mythology}} | |||
| ] ], depicting ], ] and ].]] | |||
| Comparative mythology is the systematic comparison of myths from different cultures.<ref name="Littleton, p. 32">Littleton, p. 32</ref> It seeks to discover underlying themes that are common to the myths of multiple cultures.<ref name="Littleton, p. 32"/> In some cases, comparative mythologists use the similarities between different mythologies to argue that those mythologies have a common source. This common source may be a common source of inspiration (e.g. a certain natural phenomenon that inspired similar myths in different cultures) or a common "protomythology" that diverged into the various mythologies we see today.<ref name="Littleton, p. 32"/> | |||
| Nineteenth century interpretations of myth were often highly comparative, seeking a common origin for all myths.<ref>Leonard</ref> However, modern-day scholars tend to be more suspicious of comparative approaches, avoiding overly general or universal statements about mythology.<ref name="Northup, p. 8">Northup, p. 8</ref> One exception to this modern trend is ]'s book '']'', which claims that all ] myths follow the same underlying pattern. This theory of a "]" is out of favor with the mainstream study of mythology.<ref name="Northup, p. 8"/> | |||
| ==See also== | |||
| ], ], ] | |||
| {{Portal|Mythology}} | |||
| ;General: ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] | |||
| ;Mythological archetypes: ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] | |||
| ;Myth and religion: ], ], ], ], ] (]), ], ] | |||
| ;Lists: ], ], ], ], ], ] | |||
| ==Notes== | |||
| {{Reflist|2}} | |||
| ==References== | |||
| *Armstrong, Karen. "A Short History of Myth". Knopf Canada, 2006. | |||
| *]. "The Forms of Folklore: Prose Narratives". '''Sacred Narrative: Readings in the Theory of Myth''. Ed. Alan Dundes. Berkeley: ], 1984. 5-29. | |||
| *]. '']''. Whitefish: Kessinger, 2004. | |||
| *]. "The Power of Myth". Ney York:Doubleday, 1988. | |||
| *Doty, William. ''Myth: A Handbook''. Westport: Greenwood, 2004. | |||
| *]. "Binary Opposition in Myth: The Propp/Levi-Strauss Debate in Retrospect". ''Western Folklore'' 56 (Winter, 1997): 39-50. | |||
| *Dundes, Alan. Introduction. ''Sacred Narrative: Readings in the Theory of Myth''. Ed. Alan Dundes. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984. 1-3. | |||
| *Dunes, Alan. "Madness in Method Plus a Plea for Projective Inversion in Myth". ''Myth and Method''. Ed. Laurie Patton and Wendy Doniger. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1996. | |||
| *]. ''Myth and Reality''. Trans. Willard R. Trask. New York: Harper & Row, 1963. | |||
| *Eliade, Mircea. ''Myths, Dreams and Mysteries''. Trans. Philip Mairet. New York: Harper & Row, 1967. | |||
| *"Euhemerism". ''The Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Religions''. Ed. John Bowker. Oxford University Press, 2000. ]. UC - Berkeley Library. 20 March 2009 . | |||
| * ] | |||
| *], et al. ''The Intellectual Adventure of Ancient Man: An Essay on Speculative Thought in the Ancient Near East''. Chicago:], 1977. | |||
| *]. '']''. New York: Macmillan, 1922. | |||
| *Graf, Fritz. ''Greek Mythology''. Trans. Thomas Marier. Baltimore: ], 1993. | |||
| *Honko, Lauri. "The Problem of Defining Myth". ''Sacred Narrative: Readings in the Theory of Myth''. Ed. Alan Dundes. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984. 41-52. | |||
| *Kirk, G.S. ''Myth: Its Meaning and Functions in Ancient and Other Cultures''. Berkeley: Cambridge University Press, 1973. | |||
| *Kirk, G.S. "On Defining Myths". ''Sacred Narrative: Readings in the Theory of Myth''. Ed. Alan Dundes. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984. 53-61. | |||
| *Leonard, Scott. "The History of Mythology: Part I". ''Scott A. Leonard's Home Page''. August 2007., 17 November 2009 | |||
| *Littleton, Covington. ''The New Comparative Mythology: An Anthropological Assessment of the Theories of Georges Dumezil''. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973. | |||
| *Meletinsky, Elea. ''The Poetics of Myth''. Trans. Guy Lanoue and Alexandre Sadetsky. New York: Routledge, 2000. | |||
| *"myth." ''Encyclopædia Britannica''. 2009. , 21 March 2009 | |||
| *"myths". ''A Dictionary of English Folklore''. Jacqueline Simpson and Steve Roud. Oxford University Press, 2000. Oxford Reference Online. Oxford University Press. UC - Berkeley Library. 20 March 2009 | |||
| *Northup, Lesley. "Myth-Placed Priorities: Religion and the Study of Myth". ''Religious Studies Review'' 32.1(2006): 5-10. | |||
| *O'Flaherty, Wendy. ''Hindu Myths: A Sourcebook''. London: Penguin, 1975. | |||
| *Pettazzoni, Raffaele. "The Truth of Myth". ''Sacred Narrative: Readings in the Theory of Myth''. Ed. Alan Dundes. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984. 98-109. | |||
| *Segal, Robert. ''Myth: A Very Short Introduction''. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2004. | |||
| *Simpson, Michael. Introduction. Apollodorus. ''Gods and Heroes of the Greeks''. Trans. Michael Simpson. Amherst: ], 1976. 1-9. | |||
| ==Further reading== | |||
| * Stefan Arvidsson, ''Aryan Idols. Indo-European Mythology as Ideology and Science'', University of Chicago Press, 2006. ISBN0-226-02860-7 | |||
| *], ''Mythologies'' (1957) | |||
| *Kees W. Bolle, ''The Freedom of Man in Myth''. ], 1968. | |||
| *Richard Buxton. ''The Complete World of Greek Mythology''. London: Thames & Hudson, 2004. | |||
| *E. Csapo, ''Theories of Mythology'' (2005) | |||
| *], '']'' (1998) | |||
| *Graves, Robert. "Introduction." ''New Larousse Encyclopedia of Mythology''. Trans. Richard Aldington and Delano Ames. London: Hamlyn, 1968. v-viii. | |||
| *] | |||
| **'']''. ], 1949. | |||
| **''Flight of the Wild Gander: Explorations in the Mythological Dimension: Select Essays 1944-1968'' New World Library, 3rd ed. (2002), ISBN 978-1-57731-210-9. | |||
| **'']''. Doubleday, 1988, ISBN 0-385-24773-7. | |||
| **'']''. New World Library, 2001, ISBN 1-57731-202-3 | |||
| *] | |||
| **''Cosmos and History: The Myth of the Eternal Return''. ], 1954. | |||
| **''The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion''. Trans. Willard R. Trask. NY: Harper & Row, 1961. | |||
| *Louis Herbert Gray , ''The Mythology of All Races'', in 12 vols., 1916. | |||
| *] | |||
| **''Mental Functions in Primitive Societies'' (1910) | |||
| **''Primitive Mentality'' (1922) | |||
| **''The Soul of the Primitive'' (1928) | |||
| **''The Supernatural and the Nature of the Primitive Mind'' (1931) | |||
| **''Primitive Mythology'' (1935) | |||
| **''The Mystic Experience and Primitive Symbolism'' (1938) | |||
| *Charles H. Long, ''Alpha: The Myths of Creation''. George Braziller, 1963. | |||
| *O'Flaherty, Wendy. ''Hindu Myths: A Sourcebook''. London: Penguin, 1975. | |||
| *Barry B. Powell, ''Classical Myth'', 5th edition, Prentice-Hall. | |||
| *Santillana and Von Dechend (1969, 1992 re-issue). ''Hamlet's Mill: An Essay Investigating the Origins of Human Knowledge And Its Transmission Through Myth'', ]. ISBN 0-87923-215-3. | |||
| <!--not useful to the modern reader*] | |||
| **''Introduction to the Philosophy of Mythology'', 1856. | |||
| **''Philosophy of Mythology'', 1857. | |||
| **''Philosophy of Revelation'', 1858.--> | |||
| *Walker, Steven F. and Segal, Robert A., ''Jung and the Jungians on Myth: An Introduction'', Theorists of Myth, Routledge (1996), ISBN 978-0-8153-2259-7. | |||
| *Zong, In-Sob. ''Folk Tales from Korea''. 3rd ed. Elizabeth: Hollym, 1989. | |||
| ==External links== | |||
| {{Wiktionary|myth|mythology}} | |||
| {{Wikiversity|School:Comparative Mythology}} | |||
| {{Commons category}} | |||
| *], ed. Beach (1914), at ]. | |||
| *. ]. | |||
| * Old Tales and Superstitions Interpreted by comparative mythology by John Fiske. | |||
| * | |||
| {{Philosophy topics}} | |||
| {{Philosophy of religion}} | |||
| {{Theology}} | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Link FA|no}} | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
Latest revision as of 14:01, 14 December 2022
Redirect to:
| This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|