| Revision as of 22:50, 31 March 2009 editDanz23 (talk | contribs)93 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 18:07, 2 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB |
| (12 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
*]: Expand the article's intro. |
|
*]: Expand the article's intro. |
|
*]: Provide citations for all of the <code><nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki></code>s.<sup>]]</sup> |
|
* Provide citations for all of the <code><nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki></code>s.<sup>]]</sup> |
|
*Ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of ]. See also ].<sup>]]</sup> |
|
*Ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of ]. See also ].<sup>]]</sup> |
|
*Watch for ] that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's ].) |
|
*Watch for ] that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's ].) |
|
**While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. |
|
**While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. |
|
**Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “<font color='red'><s>All</s></font> pigs are pink, so we thought of <font color='red'><s>a number of</s></font> ways to turn them green.” |
|
**Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “<span style="color:red;"><s>All</s></span> pigs are pink, so we thought of <span style="color:red;"><s>a number of</s></span> ways to turn them green.” |
|
|
|
|
'''Neutrality of this article disputed''' |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello! |
|
|
I am afraid that this article has problems regarding |
|
|
1)Neutral point of view |
|
|
2)Bias |
|
|
3)Balance |
|
|
4)Reserarch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Persians are Iran’s single largest ethnic group, yet the article try to dismiss the Persian ethnicity as non-existent and replace is with a vague concept of 'Persian identity'. It is |
|
|
sanitized form of denying the existence of Persians as a distinctive ethnic group to further political motives; The Article is extremely biased and seems to be written with a political agenda which does not comply with Wikipedias standards. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The article further contains factually wrong statements that equals Persian people with 'Tajiks' who are of a different ethnicity but speak Persian accent (Dari). The 'sources’ are of political origin that accuse Persians of racism and chauvinism. |
|
|
|
|
|
Every other demographical group in Iran is represented by a racial-definition except Persians. It is very easy to conform that Persians do exist as a distinct ethnic group, The CIA factbook lists Persians as the ethnic majority in Iran. |
|
|
|
|
|
The article has been redirected t from the neutral article 'Persian people' to a political constructed article called 'Persian identity’. This article is unique because no other people are described in this fashion. |
|