| Revision as of 16:32, 3 March 2007 editDbachmann (talk | contribs)227,714 edits →Sources← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:53, 11 March 2007 edit undoLar (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators29,172 edits Removal of materialNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| ==]== | ==]== | ||
| please read the page on what is considered "vandalism" on Misplaced Pages. Shouting vandalism at users you disagree with is not going to improve relations, or articles. ] <small>]</small> 16:32, 3 March 2007 (UTC) | please read the page on what is considered "vandalism" on Misplaced Pages. Shouting vandalism at users you disagree with is not going to improve relations, or articles. ] <small>]</small> 16:32, 3 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Removal of material == | |||
| I am seeing a disturbing pattern of removal of material without any discussion on the talk pages, your contributions from today show several examples of it. Please discuss your removals on the talk pages of the articles and make sure you are getting consensus for your changes. Phrases like "smells like POV pushing" in edit summaries are not collegial. I have reverted a few of your changes but let most of them stand for now. Second warning about material removal. ++]: ]/] 01:53, 11 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:53, 11 March 2007
Do not revert the comments of others, do not remove clarifying material claiming it is POV, and do not create pages for testing
This reversion on talk:Denmark is unacceptable. If you have an issue with a posting being unsigned, use {{unsigned2}} or just wait, User:HagermanBot does this automatically. Please do not remove the comments of others from talk pages or you may find yourself blocked. Also, why was this removed? Also, this was not an appropriate edit. If you need to experiment, use the Sandbox or a subpage of your user page. This is my second warning to you about your behaviours. Removal of this warning is a dubious, but accepted practice... but will be construed as acknowledgement that it has been read, and you may not receive another warning if I don't see improvement. ++Lar: t/c 22:42, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Sigurd Ring and Battle of Brávellir
Sorry but i really cant find cited sources on the old version. Are you the same as User:Wiglaf? --Arigato1 23:21, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- I move the discussion, here. Well, if you have a look at the article Sigurd Ring, it summarizes primary sources and cites Birger Nerman's book as a secondary source. Your additions, Commanche/Arigato1, do not appear in these sources.--Berig 23:30, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Yes, i have read most of these original sources and maybe you should do the same. --Arigato1 10:47, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Og nu kan det være nok!
Du skal ikke have lov til at skalte og valte med den fælles ressource som Misplaced Pages er.--Holger the Dane 08:58, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Sources
I case you miss it, I don't think a website on Stockholm and a 96+ year old article from an encyclopedia quite cut it as sources for anything remotely controversial. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:13, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- I have answered you on Talk:Ivar_Vidfamne --Arigato1 12:21, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Vandalism
please read the page on what is considered "vandalism" on Misplaced Pages. Shouting vandalism at users you disagree with is not going to improve relations, or articles. dab (𒁳) 16:32, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Removal of material
I am seeing a disturbing pattern of removal of material without any discussion on the talk pages, your contributions from today show several examples of it. Please discuss your removals on the talk pages of the articles and make sure you are getting consensus for your changes. Phrases like "smells like POV pushing" in edit summaries are not collegial. I have reverted a few of your changes but let most of them stand for now. Second warning about material removal. ++Lar: t/c 01:53, 11 March 2007 (UTC)